PDA

View Full Version : Low light - High ISO 5Dmk2 vs 7D


mcneep
09-02-2010, 16:38
Hi,

How much of a real world difference is there between the 5D2 and the 7D at high iso's in low light?

I'm stuck between the 2 and cant make up my mind.

I cover a wide range of stuff including motorsports and theatre shows.

Cheers

Dogfish_magnet
09-02-2010, 17:01
There's a review here (http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_7D/noise_JPEG.shtml)

ShrubMonkey
09-02-2010, 18:49
Interesting comparisons. On face value of the sample shots the 7D looks the worse at lower ISO levels (compared to the 50D)

dinners
09-02-2010, 18:56
Looks like the 7d produces less noise accross the range when each camera generates jpegs but in Raw the 5DII comes into its own.

RobertP
09-02-2010, 19:00
The link above is for in camera jpegs. there is a link to the processed raw versions near the top or here (http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_7D/noise_RAW.shtml)

dinners
09-02-2010, 19:42
Yep - that's what I thought.

7D generates less noise producing 'in camera' jpeg but 5DII produces less noise in raw.

nikolarun
09-02-2010, 20:43
I'd go with the 5D MK2 for less noise(theatere) , but the 7D would be better for motorsport.

HoppyUK
10-02-2010, 03:28
I'd go with the 5D MK2 for less noise(theatere) , but the 7D would be better for motorsport.

^^^ :thumbs: Agree.

5D2 wins the sensor battle over the 7D in every which way, and by quite a margin. The pixels are twice the size.

7D wins the action camera award by an equally convincing measure.

1D4 comes close to the 5D2 and beats the 7D at everything, for a lot more money.