PDA

View Full Version : 16-35 2.8L V 16-35 2.8L MKII

P-E
29-07-2007, 10:22
Just done a quick test with the new 16-35 2.8L against the original if it's of any interest to anyone :shrug:

All shot off tripod with remote release 16mm @2.8.....resized and cropped for web only.


16-35 2.8L

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e368/IAN-UK/Canon-16-35-f2.8MKI.jpg

16-35 2.8L MKII

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e368/IAN-UK/Canon-16-35-MKII-f2.8.jpg

Top left corner.

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e368/IAN-UK/16-35-2.8LMKII.jpg
PapaLazarou
29-07-2007, 10:40
The mk2 is much better.
Darryn
29-07-2007, 10:49
Nice to see such a differance between the two... I was playing with the idea of buying a 2nd hand 16-35, but that test has shown me im better off saving a week or two longer and getting the mkII... :) Thanks.
malla1962
29-07-2007, 11:04
Nice to see such a differance between the two... I was playing with the idea of buying a 2nd hand 16-35, but that test has shown me im better off saving a week or two longer and getting the mkII... :) Thanks.Thats just what I was thinking.;)
P-E
29-07-2007, 11:10
The original does sharpen up nicely plus I've got it for sale in the classifieds.....don't let this test put you off :lol: