PDA

View Full Version : Cameras are potentially more dangerous than guns !


malc_ppp
01-04-2008, 12:40
get your wallets out guys!

http://www.epuk.org/News/836/met-to-relax-london-photography-restrictions

Photographers who wish to photograph in the pilot area will be required to first register at Charing Cross police station bringing either a driving license, passport or birth certificate, and by paying an administration fee.

After registration, which can take up to 28 days, photographers wanting to photograph on the street will have to again attend either Charing Cross police station to be issued with a thin flourescent waistcoat fitted with an RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tag which is to be worn over other clothing.



Most amateur photographers will need a £95/year PSICO-BASIC tag. This will permit casual photography in locations where security allows. ‘We are not trying to stop people taking snaps, that would be ridiculous. But if CCTV operators see a BASIC-tagged photographer hanging around, using a pro camera with a long lens, or taking pictures at 3am, then of course we’ll probably want to have a word with them.’



;);)

Jimmy_Lemon
01-04-2008, 12:43
lmao

NathanJT
01-04-2008, 12:50
OMG!

"We will be pressing to move toward a situation where cameras will report the taking of barred photographs enabling the automatic issue of fixed penalties".

THAT is scary! ;)

mattyh
01-04-2008, 13:02
Since there's no law against it, they can **** right off :D

This is like the parking tickets by camera CCTV... you can't prosecute the registered keeper for a parking offence, only the DRIVER (unless they can positively ID the driver of course)

Jimmy_Lemon
01-04-2008, 13:03
OT - I heard about that CCTV parking thing whilst waiting on some double yellow lines next to a CCTV camera :p Put my hoody up and sun viser down :D

awp
01-04-2008, 13:04
any of you guys notice the date on this?
1st April

Jimmy_Lemon
01-04-2008, 13:05
lmao

any of you guys notice the date on this?
1st April

erm...yes! :p as did most of the others I think ;)

mattyh
01-04-2008, 13:06
any of you guys notice the date on this?
1st April

Yep, it's been 1st April all day :p

po10c
01-04-2008, 13:07
You nearly had me there!!!

fergey
01-04-2008, 14:50
Yep, 1st of April but the idea of another stealth tax to allow us to pursue our hobby wouldn't come as a shock from this Government

allanm
01-04-2008, 17:04
Problem is, some government minister is going to read this and think its a good idea!!

Allan

foodpoison
01-04-2008, 17:15
I thought it was real.
and decided if I wanted to take pictures at 3am with a pro camera (350d) and a long lens (sigma 70-300) I bloody well would.
but since it turned out to be a stinking pile of bull's crap :D :p

Ewan
01-04-2008, 17:38
enable photographers’ identities to be monitored in sensitive locations such as near government and military buildings, embassies, airports, bus and railway stations, schools, shops, banks, pubs and restaurants


So basically anywhere except your own home :bonk:

Edit: Should I have read the whole thread before replying? :p