T&C's of a couple of sites

[dod]

These are similar but on the face of it I'm happier with flickr, what does everyone else think?

Flickr

(b) With respect to Content you elect to post for inclusion in publicly accessible areas of Yahoo! Groups or that consists of photos or other graphics you elect to post to any other publicly accessible area of the Service, you grant Yahoo! a world-wide, royalty free and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, modify, adapt and publish such Content on the Service solely for the purpose of displaying, distributing and promoting the specific Yahoo! Group to which such Content was submitted, or, in the case of photos or graphics, solely for the purpose for which such photo or graphic was submitted to the Service. This licence exists only for as long as you elect to continue to include such Content on the Service and shall be terminated at the time you delete such Content from the Service.

A.N.Other

11.4 You agree that by submitting the User Submissions to us, you hereby grant us an irrevocable worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sub-licensable, transferable and worldwide license to use, modify, alter, edit, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, make compilations of and publicly perform the User Submissions in connection with our Websites and our (and our successor's) business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of our Websites (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels now in existence or developed in the future.

[Mark]

Would have to agree with you dod

[Steep]

Give your work away at no.2

[mattyh]

Flickrs are ok...

All they want is the license to show them worldwide, which they need, as the internet is world wide. They specify "solely for the purpose for which such photo or graphic was submitted to the service" - i.e. what license you chose.

A.N Other want a license to reproduce and distribute in any format they want, and use them for promotion of their websites.

Or at least thats how I read it :shrug:

I wouldn't be putting pics on A.N Others site :)

[StewartR]

:agree:

Flick's licence has to allow them to "reproduce, modify and adapt" so that they can mirror and back up their site, and re-size your images for thumbnail display etc. It's really about the most minimal set of rights they could reasonably ask for.

The other is far more exploitative. The right to "prepare derivative works" means they can basically do whatever they like with it - e.g. photoshop your head onto somebody else's body - and then they own the copyright to the end product, so there's nowt you can do about it. Avoid!