Even more colour popping SHOTS!

[ricky23432]

check this out and leave comments as you wish!

CLICK TO ENLARGE ANY OF THE IMAGES!

1#
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3095/2536531013_1ca6a5093a.jpg (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3095/2536531013_1ca6a5093a_b.jpg)


2#
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2317/2536532299_1003bd646b.jpg (http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2317/2536532299_1003bd646b_b.jpg)

3#
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2273/2536531885_21b0b2754a.jpg (http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2273/2536531885_21b0b2754a_b.jpg)

please comment as you wish!

[chump1979]

you've obviously taken a lot of photos with the sole purpose of using selective colouring in PP. The question I'd ask myself is what am i trying to achieve with selective colouring? By using it in every photo all you're showing is that you know how to use it.

I think you need to figure out what you want to achieve by using it and then use it sparingly on all but a few images IMO.

[madamelemon]

My faveriout is the first photograph as it works well as a photograph even i think if it was not edited! :P

[hillwalkinggirl]

It doesn't work for me. It just doesn't seem to add anything to the photo.

[CT]

I'm not a fan of selective colouring Ricky, I think it can work in some images, but it's too often used to try to turn an average image into something it isn't. The best shot of the three for me is the last one, and I don't think it needed the selective colouring anyway. ;)

The first shot would have benefited from a lower viewpoint IMO. The 2nd one would have been better with a different subject matter.:D

Just pulling your leg, but don't get carried away with gimmicks like selective colouring, it's no substitute for trying to get it right in the viewfinder. ;)

[ricky23432]

thanks for the great comments evry1 very helpful!