![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Talk Equipment All equipment related discussion goes in here, including digital cameras, lenses, tripods, and accessories. Read all about the current market leaders, such as the Canon EOS Digital Range (1100D, 550D, 600D, 650D, 50D, 60D, 60Da, 5D MKIII, 7D, 1D MKIV, 1D X, 1D C, and EOS M), the Nikon Range (D90, D3100, D3200, D5100, D7000, D300s, D700, D800, D800E, D3X, D3S and D4) and those offered by Sigma, Olympus, Fuji, Pentax, Sony and others |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Getting Comfy
Location: Wakefield Yorkshire
Posts: 134
|
Budget Zoom
at the moment i have borrowed my mates 55-200mm VR lens,
but hes going to want it back next month so really need to replace it on my old d50 i used a sigma 70-300mm but sold it as it did not autofocus well. there is a new 70-300mm Nikon Vr but its nearly £400 how ever i have found that nikon also make a 55-300mm VR at around £200 i have seen results of both lenses and i cant really tell much difference in image quality to justify the extra 200, or do i just go back to a 70-300mm none vr for £100 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Feet under the table
Real name : Steve
Location: Bristol (UK)
Posts: 1,793
Camera: Nikon D300 (x2)
|
The reason the 70-300VR is so much more expensive is that it is full frame whereas the 55-300 is DX.
I bought my grandson the 55-300 recently (cos he's always using the 70-300!) and am impressed by the quality of the images he has produced on his D40. The non-VR version of the 70-300 is widely regarded as Nikon's worst zoom so I wouldn't recommend it. Hope that helps
__________________
Regards Bristolian |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Getting Comfy
Location: Wakefield Yorkshire
Posts: 134
|
Cheers For your help mate
when u say full frame? i might as well get the 55-300 becayse im on a d5100 which is not a full frame cam |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|