It's not just the 1mm you are paying for, it's the f2.8
I've been agonising over whether to buy the Nikon 17-55 2.8 for weeks now. They're available as new UK stock for under £750 on Ebay. Then I read what Ken Rockwell had to say. He reckons the 18-55 kit lens is virtually as good optically and the 17-55 2.8 is an extravagance. I'm still confused as to whether to go for it.
Any Nikon owners not familiar with kenrockwell.com ?
He reckons the 18-55 kit lens is virtually as good optically and the 17-55 2.8 is an extravagance.