- Messages
- 2,820
- Name
- Mark
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi. I have about 24,000 photo's on Flickr, but most are set to allow access from family only. The original intention was that Flickr'd be a good way to let family have access to ALL our digital images.
Now though I'm wondering why they need to be private at all, and while lots would never attract comments etc, I wouldn't mind making them available for that if someone wanted to; it might help my photography.
None of them are in any way offensive, and very very few show anyone in any context that could feasibly be used inappropriately; for example although there are loads of shots of kids on there, only about 10 show them naked; for example in the bath or playing in a river. I'd keep those private.
Basically, instead of doing what I do now which is keep all my shots private, but then making exceptions for certain sets or individual images, I want to reverse the process so the private ones are the exceptions.
What's the general consensus; by keeping perfectly innocent photo's of family etc private, am I being paranoid, or is the reverse true and making them public would be taking too great a risk? I'm not even sure whether there IS any risk, beyond the risk of someone in a photo thinking I need their permission.
Do I need to ask everyone who appears in my shots (or their parents if under 18) for permission, which would be pretty impractical to say the least!
Now though I'm wondering why they need to be private at all, and while lots would never attract comments etc, I wouldn't mind making them available for that if someone wanted to; it might help my photography.
None of them are in any way offensive, and very very few show anyone in any context that could feasibly be used inappropriately; for example although there are loads of shots of kids on there, only about 10 show them naked; for example in the bath or playing in a river. I'd keep those private.
Basically, instead of doing what I do now which is keep all my shots private, but then making exceptions for certain sets or individual images, I want to reverse the process so the private ones are the exceptions.
What's the general consensus; by keeping perfectly innocent photo's of family etc private, am I being paranoid, or is the reverse true and making them public would be taking too great a risk? I'm not even sure whether there IS any risk, beyond the risk of someone in a photo thinking I need their permission.
Do I need to ask everyone who appears in my shots (or their parents if under 18) for permission, which would be pretty impractical to say the least!
Last edited: