Motorcycle II

Messages
1,076
Name
Mike
Edit My Images
Yes
OK, well recently ariel7515 offered a few shots of a 1970's BMW R5-/5 motorcycle, he came accross in Valencia, taken with his Yashica FR1 camera & 50. (see thread Motorcycle). I offered a fairly lengthy critique on the shots, which were in B&W and I had to admit 'artful', but not to my taste; close crops picking out selective detail, I thought of more aesthetic appeal, rather than technical. Primarily a recordist, interested in such details, this sort of jarred with my own expectations, as I was looking for the bits not in shot I thought ought to have been!
However; TWO DAYS after ariel posted his pictures, and the very next day after I had offered my appraisal of them... bludger me sideways with a 500mm Centon Mirror lens! I happened upon a classic 1960's BMW R69! Parked virtually at the end of my street, would you believe! I was taking my O/H to work at the time, and there was nearly an accident... similar to being bludgered sideways with a 500mm Centon Mirror! As I e-stopped and reached for camera a to grab a few shots; to the utter annoyance of SWMBO, who didn't want to be late for work! But luckily, it was still there after I had dropped her off. So I jumped out and fired off a few frames; to see what my take on the subject might be.

So, lets get on with it; THIS is the camera used.

1230062_658899890801598_226305816_n.jpg

Frame 0 (From Digital)

Its a 1970's Konica C35, 35mm 'zone-focus' compact, with fixed 35mm f2.8 Hexanon lens. It has Fully Auto, or Aperture Priority Exposure modes, from fully coupled incident meter, in the lens-ring.

Camera's providence is that it was bought new, by my Grandfather, some-time in the mid to late 70's, and used seldom. I was given it some time after he died in 1993, and it lived in my car glove-box as a 'grab-shot' camera; for those highly unlikely occasions I might spot a photo-opportunity and not have another camera to hand! I think I probably ran only two or three films through it in ten years, when in 2003, it was replaced in the glove-box by a digital compact.

Recently sorting through box of 'stuff' off the top of the wardrobe; I picked it up, smiled; checked the rewind crank to check if loaded, and had a fiddle; discovering, remarkably that the battery wasn't flat! Common 'problem' with these, there was no on-off switch for the meter; only thing that limited current draw was putting the oft forgotten lens cap on!

So, quite surprised, I cleaned it up and decided to drop a film in it; and put in back in the car glove box, 'just in case'. And probably less than a week before this BMW chanced into view, on an occasion, I would not otherwise have a camera to hand, just dropping O/H off to work!

I smelled the hands of fete at work here, and little Loki out for a laugh; but hey; when the gods deal you a hand, you play it, right? So lets get on with it.

No particular plan involved, nor pre-conceptions of what I wanted to get. Old camera, not used for a decade; which I was rather concerned probably has rather shot light-seals, if nothing else. Out of Date Greek-Olympics, Kodak Gold 100 film. Zone Focusing and Parallax error... I was listing the potential excuses before I even started!

So, this is what I got. Developed this week at ASDA and scanned at home.

1234095_658899834134937_345462252_n.jpg

Frame 1: Straight from ASDA & out the scanner, with no adjustment or correction; a basic no-arty farty, straight record shot of the bike, as spotted. Thought the negs looked a bit dark... histograms suggests that the frame was at least two stops over exposed. And the whole set so suffered to greater or lesser degree.

It was a pretty sunny day; almost certainly an f16 sunny rule follower. THINKING about it, that's smallest aperture on the C35, which I seem to recall has fastest shutter speed of 1/650th.. actually I have the thing to hand and... err... yup that's fastest shutter marked in view-finder! So could have been that the shots I tried to get a bit arty on, opening up to f2.8, for a shallow DoF over exposed, running out of shutter speeds! Would have needed something around the 1/2000th mark and camera just don't have it! But still. I thought I put in on 'Auto' for the record shots... thought.... bad move thinking! Maybe it didn't click'in'!

1186171_658899860801601_559668676_n.jpg

Frame 2: As previous; with a little Post-Process correction, pulling the exposure back a bit and adjusting curve; Not TOO bad. As straight record shot.

Few interesting features of this bike for you;

- If you look at the front wheel, you'll notice that rather than conventional telescopic forks, this machine has an arrangement called an 'Earle's-Fork', that uses a swing-arm and a pair of telescopic shock-absorers to provide suspension. Quite a unique feature of the model, BMW used it for only a short while.

- If you look at the back wheel; you'll notice BMW's renowned shaft drivel that saves the maintenance hassles of a conventional chain drive; but also note the rear suspension arrangement. The frame tubes continue from under the petrol tank and run around the outside of the wheel, almost to its spindle, in the manner of a 'rigid' frame motorcycle that has no rear suspension; but instead of the wheel being bolted directly to the frame, turrets on the end of the frame house shock absorber units. This is known as the 'Plunger' type rear suspension. Its not actually a full, 'plunger' arrangement, as it also uses a swinging arm from behind the gearbox to locate the wheel; some-times known as 'Swing-Plunger' or 'Semi-Plunger' suspension to differentiate it from those motorcycles that just had the axle of the rear wheel mounted on the plunger shock-absorber units without any other location assistance. Again a feature of older BMW models, and I think dating back to the very first BMW R32 of 1929, I think.

- The 'Duel Seat'.. quite a distinctive feature of this model, and dating it to the early 1960's. A fashionable feature on motorcycles of the era, that had mostly adopted full twin-shock rear suspension by that time, and adopted a 'horizontal seat rail, running horizontally from the tail light to the head-stock, supporting the seat and petrol tank. They were normally a fairly flat cushion, that supported both rider and passenger, in place of earlier, bicycle style individual saddles. The BMW retaining the plunger suspension mounting, and having frame rails running down and around the rear wheel, then, had to blend their duel seat into the gaps between the mudguard and frame, creating something altogether more tailored and distinctive. Also note the bicycle style tyre pump mounted on the frame rail, just beneath the saddle! A very quaint period feature.

- Otherwise, the machine has the distinctive horizontally opposed air-cooled 'Boxer' engine, again based on the very first BMW design of the 1930's retained in lay-out at least in current models. Nice feature of this model is the 'un-fendered' air-filter housing on the rear of the crank-case. And note the pleasing aesthetic 'swoop' of pipe work from there through the carburetor, into the round rocker cover cylinder head, and into the curved 'pea-shooter' exhaust.

- The machine is remarkably authentic, apart from one fairly obvious non original bit of equipment; and that is the modern Michelin M45 Tyres. (Co-Incidentally the same as I have fitted to a number of my own bikes! Very good tyres, they are!) The tread pattern is not the classic block-tread rear and ribbed front that would have been fitted when the machine was new. But I quite like it. Only reason these would have been fitted, is because who ever owns it, USES it! Its not a pampered show-piece brought out on high days and holidays! them tyres are for all weather grip and high miles wear!

1236543_658899700801617_1192337571_n.jpg

Frame 4: View from the front. Horrendously 'blown' & pulled back, probably due to the bright sky, but second record shot, that should have been on Auto; taken to show more detail of that interesting front fork arrangement.

Note also the curved front number plate. Another clue to the bike being in regular use. When made, number plates were required to be displayed both front and rear of a motorcycle; and curved number-plates like that one, would have been mounted on top of the front mudguard, running around it like a Roman Centurions crest. No longer required, (Since I think 1973 or so actually), they were deemed a danger to 'pedestrians' and often referred to as 'pedestrian slicer' number-plates.

15385_658899887468265_918525659_n.jpg

Frame 5: Parallax error strikes! This was supposed to shoe that Earle's Fork, from the top, looking down! If you move the speedo in the center of the headlamp nacelle to the center, that's how I had TRIED to frame it! The Camera has a very small correction guide in the top corner of the view-finder frame, to suggest shifting the center slightly up and left for close-ups, I obviously didn't apply enough parallax correction.

And that's picture quota for this post, so... To Be Continued!
 
OK, onto the Ariel inspired, Arty shots...
7901_658899757468278_94398893_n.jpg

Frame 6: It's blown to bludgery, & pulled back hard! I wanted to capture something of that engine. Such a dominany feature of the make. I hoped the cylinder with that round rocker cover would loom out of the frame and dominate the picture; with the flow of plumbing either side of it, and the tank, fading OoF softening the setting for it... might have worked... possibly!
1187231_658899697468284_669988905_n.jpg

Frame 7 Again, the same theme; presenting THAT engine, but in 'plan' this time from a higher angle
1234864_658899767468277_210370467_n.jpg

Frame 8 Riders Eye View. Again, horendousely blown and pulled back. This was supposed to be a bit dreamy, as if I was just parked up and getting off, the controls of the bike in view, clean and uncluttered, the pub scene fading oof.

1231666_658899754134945_1493051219_n.jpg

Frame 9 Taking the Plunge. This one has worked closest to what I had imagined. Apart from the over-exposure and a small amount of parallax error. I wanted to get the rear plunger turret and the shaft drive crown wheel housing in focus, with the depth of field building to it, then fading into the distance, that dominant engine softening as you look beyond to the oof pub setting, on dreamy sunny afternoon.

553689_658899694134951_1709222524_n.jpg

Frame 10 Recovered Record shot... blown and pulled, I dont know... maybe the accidental lomo-effect, kind of 'works'... I dont know. I know its not what I was aiming for, but then I was trying to do something different! Have I achieved that 'something' by serendipity?

One thing, I do like that little camera! Shots didn't work, but that was me, a little rusty and never overly familiar with this little camera. In the right hands I could see it delivering blinding shots. Guess it needs more use! But we'll see!

One thing is for sure, that was one lovely motorcycle!
 
Really like 9 and 10, got a lovely dated, warm feel to them, suits the subject well. Love the bike!
(y)
 
Really like 9 and 10, got a lovely dated, warm feel to them, suits the subject well. Love the bike!
(y)
It's a fantastic machine, isn't it. And RIDDEN too by the looks of it. Not just some museum piece of garage trophy!
Anyway... time perhaps to loose the warm 'lomo' effect... or at least try!

The difference a Scan can make!

I returned to the negs to see if I could do that lovely machine better justice.

Frame 2 Original Processed Scan
1186171_658899860801601_559668676_n.jpg

Frame 2v2 Reworked Camera Scan
577331_660134687344785_1733634374_n.jpg


Frame 4 Original Processed Scan
1236543_658899700801617_1192337571_n.jpg

Frame 4v2 Reworked Camera Scan
13008_660134610678126_81032640_n.jpg


Frame 6 Original Processed Scan
7901_658899757468278_94398893_n.jpg

Frame 6v2 Reworked Camera Scan
541829_660134650678122_2077843665_n.jpg


Cont:-
 
Frame 7 Original Processed Scan
1187231_658899697468284_669988905_n.jpg

Frame 7v2 Reworked Camera Scan
1235092_660134607344793_712960621_n.jpg


Frame 8 Original Processed Scan
1234864_658899767468277_210370467_n.jpg

Frame 8v2 Reworked Camera Scan
1229895_660134644011456_460014984_n.jpg


Frame 9 Original Processed Scan
1231666_658899754134945_1493051219_n.jpg

Frame 9v2 Reworked Camera Scan
1237609_660134640678123_767820608_n.jpg


Cont....
 
Cont....
Frame 10 Original Processed Scan
553689_658899694134951_1709222524_n.jpg

Frame 10v2 Reworked Camera Scan
1234431_660134604011460_1423042250_n.jpg


Frame 11v2 Reworked Camera Scan
971973_660134754011445_1965788027_n.jpg



Camera-Scans were created, rather long-windedly; using a Jessops 'Slide-Duplicator' lens; a manual T-Mount lens, originally on an Olympus mount, to fit my OM's, but re-mounted to fit the Nikon. Pretty simple bit of kit; you put it on the camera, stick a slide or neg strip holder in the front and take phot of it.

Of course, on D3200, I have the small impediment of the crop-factor; so I can only get 1/4 of a frame in frame; so have to take four shots then merge in Photo-Shop. Does give me 50Mpix+ images though! And I lack any kind of metering; which means on a negative, I have to run a test brackets, to get something that's about right when inverted; THEN mugger about in PS to get rid of the blue cast, and get the colour balence something like!

Results, then are always rather heavily post-processed and tend to be rather gritty; but I can pull a lot of detail of a neg that my scanner wont. As has shown here!

WHY? Well, I once paid nearly £500 for a negative scanner. Its rather obsolete and I'm loath to spend that much again on one! Especially as thats more than any of my cameras cost! £80 web-cam type scanner, isn't brilliant, but one of the better of the genre and usually 'adequete' as well as fairly quick and convenient, until I hit something more 'tricky' like this; which is when, being a cheap-skate, I resort to the old-school, and either do this, with the Slide-Duplicator, or stick the Nik on its back under the enlarger! Duplicator lens is slightly less hassle!

Interesting to hear what you think, about them. Some, I think that the more raw web-cam-scans are more 'natural', others that the cam-scans have managed to extract better detail.

Frame 7, for example; the cam-scan has managed to render the detail in the BMS badge on the tank, that was lost in the web-cam-scan, while the reflections in the metal of teh chrome inlet pipe and the biffed allow of the crank-case have come out more natural.
 
Few interesting features of this bike for you...

Thanks for the info, you have a very good knowledge of classic bikes, evidently. :)

Note also the curved front number plate... they were deemed a danger to 'pedestrians' and often referred to as 'pedestrian slicer' number-plates.

I didn't know that, I always liked that number plates but, from now on, I will see them with other eyes.

...Interesting to hear what you think, about them.

It's difficult to restore and/or enhance overexposed or underexposed pictures (from film or digital), because the lack of information, you can't restore what doesn't exists. No matter what kind of equipment you use.

I like #2, #9, #9v2 and #10, but picture #9 is the best, a very nice shot and view from the rear side. I've tried a similar shot when I made the pictures of the BMW but it didn't work for me.

Keep shooting to those nice classic bikes, and hiding cameras in your car. (y)
 
Back
Top