- Messages
- 11,513
- Name
- Stewart
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Some of you may remember that a couple of months ago LensesForHire had its first loss - a customer left a Canon 10-22 on a train, and it was never returned. Since (a) it was in a sealed box bearing the customer's name and address; and (b) he's in the phone book; and (c) the box contained documentation showing that it was our lens, and bearing our contact details; the police and the insurance company agreed that it should be treated as "theft" rather than just "loss".
My neighbour who's a policeman advised me to keep a watch on eBay, because that's where a lot of stolen goods end up. So I programmed a search to look for used 10-22s being sold from UK addresses, and yesterday one popped up. (In fact several have popped up over the weeks. But only this one caught my attention.)
Here it is.
To me it looks superficially like it might be my lens because
My neighbour who's a policeman advised me to keep a watch on eBay, because that's where a lot of stolen goods end up. So I programmed a search to look for used 10-22s being sold from UK addresses, and yesterday one popped up. (In fact several have popped up over the weeks. But only this one caught my attention.)
Here it is.
To me it looks superficially like it might be my lens because
- The seller is in the right part of the country - only about 10 miles from where my one was stolen.
- There's no mention of a box or a manual, which weren't with my lens when it was stolen.
- There's no mention of a filter, but it's clearly fitted with one - as was mine.
- His explanation seems a bit weak/odd - and when you look at his descriptions for some of the other photographic items he's sold (for example this and this and this), I think there's something odd about them too. But I can't quite put my finger on it. (On the other hand maybe he's just not very well educated / inarticulate.)