Some fantastic photos as always Glen and pretty sure the bird photographers around here enjoy viewing them, but it would be so much better if you were actually a more active part of this community, helping others with posts here inspiring them to reach your levels of skill and perhaps taking some time to thank the people that have taken some of their time to comment on the umpteen threads you have started to show off your photos. A forum like TP works because it is a two way street.
Some fantastic photos as always Glen and pretty sure the bird photographers around here enjoy viewing them, but it would be so much better if you were actually a more active part of this community, helping others with posts here inspiring them to reach your levels of skill and perhaps taking some time to thank the people that have taken some of their time to comment on the umpteen threads you have started to show off your photos. A forum like TP works because it is a two way street.
Pass on the knowledge to others that is how people learn, he is obviously very skilled and should offer critique in his field. IMHO
You cannot seriously think that a pro that produces images that are in a totally different class compared too 99.9% of what you see on here is going to bother posting "Nice shot" on images that would end up in his recycle bin
Any other Critique on here gets the hankies out :dummy1:
Superb set of images again Glen and would be very hard to find anything wrong with these, maybe naming them would be helpfull
That's why he's a Pro and you aint
Sometimes that will be driven by knowledge of the intended audience. For example, photos destined for magazines classical rules of composition are less important than flexibility. Editors need room in crop an image to fit the page layout or overlay text.Well I sometimes find it strange that Pro's seem to neglect basic composition. I've seen it many times on here, not just in wildlife but all sections. Must be artistic license
