- Messages
- 298
- Edit My Images
- No
Hello all,
In my search to find a more suitable second body than the one i have i have been looking at the 50D now, but after reading reviews of it lined up against the D300 the Nikon comes out on top in almost every area, so would i be silly to buy a 50D (when in a few months im planning on getting another 5D2 anyway).
So im wondering if it would be too much of a pain to buy a second body Nikon to go with my 5D2.
I wouldnt be swapping lenses all the time, i would just have one WA lens on it and be done with it.
The only problem i can see is the editing of 2 different RAW formats.
I dont want to start a Nikon is better because this this and this argument, i just want opinions on having 2 brands of body for shooting.
Anyone help me out ??
In my search to find a more suitable second body than the one i have i have been looking at the 50D now, but after reading reviews of it lined up against the D300 the Nikon comes out on top in almost every area, so would i be silly to buy a 50D (when in a few months im planning on getting another 5D2 anyway).
So im wondering if it would be too much of a pain to buy a second body Nikon to go with my 5D2.
I wouldnt be swapping lenses all the time, i would just have one WA lens on it and be done with it.
The only problem i can see is the editing of 2 different RAW formats.
I dont want to start a Nikon is better because this this and this argument, i just want opinions on having 2 brands of body for shooting.
Anyone help me out ??