- Messages
- 454
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Lowepro Apex 100. The zip does do up around the top, with the 18-55 in the bag and the 22mm on the camera, but does look a bit stretched.. [emoji45]^Nice shots.
Which bag did you go for?
Lowepro Apex 100. The zip does do up around the top, with the 18-55 in the bag and the 22mm on the camera, but does look a bit stretched.. [emoji45]^Nice shots.
Which bag did you go for?
For the price it's awesome!So... I did this really daft thing... I looked in this thread and now I can't stop looking at pics from the little M! Seems an awesome little thing!
I think I may HAVE to buy one on Friday.
Will probably add the 22mm after the new year once all the postage gets back to normal etc.
Does anyone use one with old m42 lenses? If so which adapter is recommended? Is there one that is better?
You won't regret it, it's a superb camera especially at the current price (I paid a good deal more for mine). I am continually battling not to buy another one... Must resist!
Same here, i think i will probably succumb when i get my Christmas work bonus
Can't be much stock left with us all buying them up!!! Lol.I think I may HAVE to buy one on Friday.
Will probably add the 22mm after the new year once all the postage gets back to normal etc.
Does anyone use one with old m42 lenses? If so which adapter is recommended? Is there one that is better?
You won't regret it, it's a superb camera especially at the current price (I paid a good deal more for mine). I am continually battling not to buy another one... Must resist!
You won't regret it, it's a superb camera especially at the current price (I paid a good deal more for mine). I am continually battling not to buy another one... Must resist!
Perhaps I'm being a bit harsh on the case and should give it another go. Definitely agree bout tripod use with the case.I quite like the silicone case. I find it much easier to grip, especially when I have it in a coat pocket when out and about, It is a complete pain though when using a tripod.
The other option that's tempting is this grip. Has anyone tried it?
Does anyone use one with old m42 lenses? If so which adapter is recommended? Is there one that is better?
It's a great add on to the camera, love the size of it all, and because no zoom on it, have to be a bit more creative.My 22mm lens arrived today. I only managed to get out later on when the light was poor, so my keeper rate wasn't very high (missed the IS on the kit lens) but first impressions are excellent. Best £50 I've spent in a long time!
It's a great add on to the camera, love the size of it all, and because no zoom on it, have to be a bit more creative.
I'm using a toshiba flash air card in mine, as I believe a few others are as well. I've found it pretty good so far and adds wireless capabilities if needed. Although I haven't used it as much as I thought I would. (The wireless that is!!)Which SD cards are people using?
I'm using a toshiba flash air card in mine, as I believe a few others are as well. I've found it pretty good so far and adds wireless capabilities if needed. Although I haven't used it as much as I thought I would. (The wireless that is!!)
I've found mine to be good. When you get it, there's a picture on the card, and I believe if you protect that picture it disables the wireless, thus saving battery life! Unprotect the picture and it turns wireless on (I think that's correct!!).Wow, they are very reasonably priced. I'll have to grab one of those once Christmas is out of the way.
I'm using a toshiba flash air card in mine, as I believe a few others are as well. I've found it pretty good so far and adds wireless capabilities if needed. Although I haven't used it as much as I thought I would. (The wireless that is!!)
How many raw images are you guys getting on a 16gb card? I have a spare 8gb but I'm thinking I'll either need more cards or a bigger one!
Got a 64Gb Transcend too which is mainly for my video trials!
IIRC I was getting either 460 or 500 Raw (only) files on a 16GB card. I'd check for you but the card is all packaged up ready to be sent back to Amazon.
Good to hear of another Transcend user.
Unfortunately I can't answer as haven't been far enough away from laptop to worry bout space yet. I always try and use minimum 16gb card. Don't think I've ever run out.How many raw images are you guys getting on a 16gb card? I have a spare 8gb but I'm thinking I'll either need more cards or a bigger one!
Which SD cards are people using?
I'm using a toshiba flash air card in mine
Which SD cards are people using?
Beauty of the flashair card is you can use a normal browser to view/download pics, you don't have to use specific software like some other brands, and they're cheaper.Same here. No problems so far!
Which bag did you go for?
I've just seen on another forum that the 22mm is listed on Amazon.com as Old Model.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-M-Compact-System-MODEL/dp/B008NF8BRI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1418979512&sr=8-1&keywords=canon 22mm
I guess it could be an error, but it could maybe be something to do with a faster newer model coming out to compliment a faster M3? (okay, it's a reach and maybe just me hoping).
One thing that did strike me was the price difference. 22mm on Amazon UK £169.00. On USA $103.82 (£66), roughly the same as on import here I guess. I then had a look at the new EF-S 24mm price (want one for the Missus). UK £171.99, USA $149 (£95). The best price I could see via import on eBay was £126 so I think I'll wait for prices to drop here before buying.
Strange to call it an "Old" model when there is not, as yet, a "new" model.
It would be interesting if Canon could get much more light through the current 22mm lens. F1.8 could be a target but to what end? A largerens/barrel and the current form lost? At what price.? The attraction of the current killer price of the kit might be lost chasing a dragon of wider aperture/IQ
In the case of an M3 release, there has been a short "wish list" earlier in the thread. I certainly have listed mine but whilst dreaming is one thing the bottom line is how nuch better can it realistically get?
The 22mm pancake is a fantastic lens for the price and at the £55-80 mark on EBay even more so.
To take an analagous viewpoint, I have an original EF 50mm f/1.8 mk 1 and a newer plastic mk2. For 98% of shots when I do comparisons on my DSLR I cannot see any difference in image results. Yet the mk 1 on my EOS 3 film camera produces deeper colours than the mk 2 on the same camera on the same roll of film??
So if/when a "new" 22mm M lens arrives, it is going to have to be one hell of a lens to be worth buying over the current one. Then at what price?
As I have said earlier in the thread, it is entirely possible that s cogent M3 with new M lenses added to the range could see me selling off my DSLR kit.
Now with my knee damage I am stuffed getting out and about so my kit is clean as a new pin :-(
Steve
My thought on a reason for a new 22mm was faster AF to compliment a faster M3. To me it makes sense that this will be an area that Canon focus on as it got so much bad publicity on the first M. I agree with you completely, the 22mm is just great and I can't see me buying a newer model for any reason. But I would buy the M3 if it's a descent upgrade.
The M is now my only camera. I had to sell my 7d and expensive lenses in the Summer due to financial reasons. When my finances recovered the plan was to get a 5d III or maybe a Sony A7r but I couldn't decide which route to take. I bought the M as a stop gap (so cheap) while I decided on where to spend my money.
What I've found is I prefer the M to my old set-up, and I'm getting better results, so I'm sticking with this format. I shoot mainly landscape so don't need insane AF or 10 FPS shooting speeds. I would like a few more features though (option for EVF/OVF, tethering, better grip etc). If Canon don't release a higher spec M3 I'll still stick with the M but maybe get a M2 as well, just for the tethering. I'm also tempted to have my current M converted to IR when I get another.
Don't envy you with the knee problems. I smashed mine 20 years ago and remember it well. Hope it heels quickly mate.