- Messages
- 2,490
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
Nothing too serious, but I was thinking about this last night. I'm not a pro (although did work as one for a short while), just a serious amateur, so I can't write any of my photographic purchases off against tax etc.
I've lost track and also shudder to think about how much equipment I've gone through over the past 10 years or so, but it's probably well over £10-£15k. Just wondering how many of the TPer's on here are affected by GAS ? As we know there is always a newer and better camera, lens or flash just round the corner or a new format altogether (thinking MILC for instance).
Whilst primarily a Nikon shooter (and have been for over 35 years), I've now really got into M4/3 and have in the past year spent a small fortune on getting a usable system up and running now with GH4, OMD-EM1 and GX7 bodies, but I must have purchased over a dozen lenses in the last year for M4/3 as I had to have it, only to sell most of them some months later due to non use (and always at a loss). Yes, I have it bad.
I've gone though the same with my Nikon stuff as well. I went from a D2Xs for instance, to a D3 (as it was the latest and greatest), to a D3s (as it was better) then onto a D4. Now whilst the D4 for example is absolutely superb and the best camera I've ever owned, are my photos any better than those taken with the D3, or has it made me a better photographer ? To answer the first, maybe no more than 10-15% are better (due to the improved low light performance), but the vast majority are very similar, and no, I don't think it's made me a better photographer. Now the D810 is the latest and greatest Nikon DSLR to own, and I'm looking at my D800 and thinking to myself noooooo......!!!! I actually think the D810 is a watershed for me, as at last it's made me realise that whilst no doubt a better camera that the 800 or the 800e, it would could me well over £1k to upgrade to this latest body, for an incremental increase in shooting ability for my style of photography (I know everyone's mileage will be different), so I've had to finally say to myself NO ! - the D800 is fabulous and the £1k is better in my back pocket.
Don't know about you lot, but when visiting TP, I nearly always within minutes gravitate to the classified section to see what else I could buy. So last night I decided to get all my photographic equipment out and was quite shocked to see what I've accumulated. For Nikon DSLR bodies for instance I have a D300S, D7100, D800 and D4 - I have 9 Nikon lenses (ranging from 16mm to 300mm), a Tamron 150-600 super zoom, , 3 Nikon converters, 3 Nikon Speed lights, various remotes and other accessories. For my M4/3 I have the above mentioned 3 bodies along with 7 lenses and a Panasonic flash. To say I have more than enough is an understatement !
So, I am now seeking help for my GAS with the aid of my wife, who is only too happy to stop me spending . I know feel a lot better knowing that I'm not chasing equipment for equipment sake, and can at last get on with the real task of actually taking photos. To re-enforce this, I've been looking at a number of images in the various Photo Genres here on TP, and many of the very best shots are taken on equipment that's at least 2 or 3 generation older than current and they are still fabulous.
Is anyone else like me and has seen the light, or am I just one very sad individual with too much spare cash and no life
I've lost track and also shudder to think about how much equipment I've gone through over the past 10 years or so, but it's probably well over £10-£15k. Just wondering how many of the TPer's on here are affected by GAS ? As we know there is always a newer and better camera, lens or flash just round the corner or a new format altogether (thinking MILC for instance).
Whilst primarily a Nikon shooter (and have been for over 35 years), I've now really got into M4/3 and have in the past year spent a small fortune on getting a usable system up and running now with GH4, OMD-EM1 and GX7 bodies, but I must have purchased over a dozen lenses in the last year for M4/3 as I had to have it, only to sell most of them some months later due to non use (and always at a loss). Yes, I have it bad.
I've gone though the same with my Nikon stuff as well. I went from a D2Xs for instance, to a D3 (as it was the latest and greatest), to a D3s (as it was better) then onto a D4. Now whilst the D4 for example is absolutely superb and the best camera I've ever owned, are my photos any better than those taken with the D3, or has it made me a better photographer ? To answer the first, maybe no more than 10-15% are better (due to the improved low light performance), but the vast majority are very similar, and no, I don't think it's made me a better photographer. Now the D810 is the latest and greatest Nikon DSLR to own, and I'm looking at my D800 and thinking to myself noooooo......!!!! I actually think the D810 is a watershed for me, as at last it's made me realise that whilst no doubt a better camera that the 800 or the 800e, it would could me well over £1k to upgrade to this latest body, for an incremental increase in shooting ability for my style of photography (I know everyone's mileage will be different), so I've had to finally say to myself NO ! - the D800 is fabulous and the £1k is better in my back pocket.
Don't know about you lot, but when visiting TP, I nearly always within minutes gravitate to the classified section to see what else I could buy. So last night I decided to get all my photographic equipment out and was quite shocked to see what I've accumulated. For Nikon DSLR bodies for instance I have a D300S, D7100, D800 and D4 - I have 9 Nikon lenses (ranging from 16mm to 300mm), a Tamron 150-600 super zoom, , 3 Nikon converters, 3 Nikon Speed lights, various remotes and other accessories. For my M4/3 I have the above mentioned 3 bodies along with 7 lenses and a Panasonic flash. To say I have more than enough is an understatement !
So, I am now seeking help for my GAS with the aid of my wife, who is only too happy to stop me spending . I know feel a lot better knowing that I'm not chasing equipment for equipment sake, and can at last get on with the real task of actually taking photos. To re-enforce this, I've been looking at a number of images in the various Photo Genres here on TP, and many of the very best shots are taken on equipment that's at least 2 or 3 generation older than current and they are still fabulous.
Is anyone else like me and has seen the light, or am I just one very sad individual with too much spare cash and no life
Last edited: