new bling

[automaton2]

 

[HIMUPNORTH]

#1 is more Blaine than Bling.

Either i am getting used to your work or it is improving Auto... hard to say

 

[CT]

I'm getting quite worried... I'm starting to like 'em.

 

[Arkady]

Agreed - #3 and #4 are really good. #1 lacks something for me and the last (straight) B&W doesn't really work at all - too flat, though the light doesn't help - looks like it was lit by flourescents, which is never the best light around.

 

[automaton2]

thanks

id love
"getting used to " my stuff

whose blaine vs bling
im in boston:nuts:

i use a b/w filter then tweak w selective color layer
http://www.photo-plugins.com/Plugins/Plugins/B-W-Conversion-2.html

found this recently
works great to recolorize and change luminosity
can make a quadtone with b/w
http://www.dslreports.com/r0/downlo...48f9a737a28f4ae2e1999/pog_lab_blender_051.zip

appreciate feedback
hope you like filters

 

[Venomator]

Great set with a difference Auto ... number 1 & 2 for me ...

I have to say the last looks a bit out of place ... like you forgot to process it before posting ...

 

[automaton2]

oy
sometimes an attempt

poopsout:nuts:

thanxz 4 reply

 

[Venomator]

HeHe ... great to know ...

... you'reonlyoomanthen ...

 

[minimeeze]

See Automaton - post your stuff on here for long enough and people start to like it

Not too keen on #3 (a bit OTT for me), or #6 (lacks the 'Automaton' trademark ), but I think the rest are great.

 

[automaton2]

appreciation is cool

as i look at old works
fortunately i can see changes:nuts:

evolution i suspect

 

[Matt]

something a little different creeping into your shots now, interesting!

 

[automaton2]

its like im channeling:nuts:

hopefully my editing skills are changing over time

you make me happy with your commentary

thanks