Have you tried the m3? I had a quick fondle with one and it felt crap tbh. The vf is very gimmicky and plastic. The vf on the x30 is astonishingly good.
I have considered the X30 but worried about Fuji build quality and the sensor not delivering as much as the LX100 or small mirror-less could do for portrait isolation and group shot sharpness.
The build issue qualities have arisen from the XF1 issues I have had and could just be specific to that but IIRC the X10 did have white orb issues?
Just for fun I stuck the xf1 on the back of my scope...
Struggling to attach the image on my tablet, hope this link works
https://flic.kr/p/qY5QDD
I love shots of the intimate landscape.
Admittedly they are very Marmite, but the little Fuji's excel at this kinda thing
Here's two taken today...
Anybody care to guess what the subject is?
A question from a latecomer to the compact X-series. I picked up a nearly new mint condition X10 back in December. I have a lens hood/filter holder but wonder if I its best to fit a 40mm circular polariser filter or use the filter holder and use the 52mm one I already use on my Nikkor 50mm and 35mm primes?
While the ability to use a filter I already own is a plus, it is rather cumbersome and partly obstructs the view through the OVF and the 40mm filter does seem to be a more elegant solution.
Thoughts anyone?
Point taken. I guess where I'm coming from is that I often "set and forget" such a filter once I've established what I'm shooting and where the sun is. But you're right about not seeing the effect through the OVF. I suppose that years of DSLR use have made me forget about the different ways of "seeing" with a rangefinder type camera.Hmmmm, the use of the viewfinder whilst using a polarizer on a rangefinder style camera seems to be secondary to me, as you cannot see the effect the filter is having on the scene.
I use the Cokin system filters on my X20 and always utilise the rear screen.
Rhodese.