Yes - this is a much better picture of a rainbow than your other one
Colours again good.
Re composition - if that is the right word - ?would it be a stronger image if you flipped it horizontally?
I say that because I understand (ie I read it recently) that the strongest part is potentially the bottom RHS thirds cross-section. If you fliopped it then the end of therainbow would be there and the rainbow itself would 'close off' the image - I think the term is 'provide a stopper'
I see what you mean about the composition but think i prefer the first one. Instead of leading to the house, the rainbow springs from it . Also i don't like flipping landscape picture because they to relate to the real world and if you know a place it feels wrong to look a mirrored image.
Nice and very vibrante rainbow, you've got there. The wall in the foreground is a bit distracting. A shame you cannot cut it without sacrifying too much foreground but a nice capture you have there!
Some of the best shots in photography are made when the so called rules are broken!!!
For me it's a great shot Geof either way round.
George.
That was a surprisingly effective flip Geof, and well done to Chris for suggesting it. For me the photo is now of the end of the rainbow landing, rather than the rainbow shooting out of the photo as it was in the first one. Hang them both on your wall and see what people prefer!
Thanks Geof for showing the two treatments.
For me both are valid but is a good example of where the title is important. As peter implies the title of the revised version could be (eg) 'The house at the end of the rainbow' and is something that the people who actually live there might like to have on THEIR wall
its all i have left, Chris...All good stuff - just shows there is no ONE correct answer to all this stuff - you just have to go with what YOU like and enjoy it.