I have the F4 non-IS 70-200 and I'm considering an upgrade. I pretty much use this as an all round lens (wildlife, sports, events, etc) for anything that needs more than 50mm.
The 2.8 IS is the obvious upgrade but what's it like in terms of weight/size? A quick google suggests that it's twice as heavy (700g vs 1.4 kg)? Is that really that noticeable? I also can't seem to find dimension comparisons at the smallest length (e.g. for carrying around in bag).
Anything else I should be considering? Any help/advice appreciated
The 2.8 IS is the obvious upgrade but what's it like in terms of weight/size? A quick google suggests that it's twice as heavy (700g vs 1.4 kg)? Is that really that noticeable? I also can't seem to find dimension comparisons at the smallest length (e.g. for carrying around in bag).
Anything else I should be considering? Any help/advice appreciated
Last edited: