kennysarmy
Yeah but can your army do this?
- Messages
- 7,312
- Name
- Jeff
- Edit My Images
- No
My main camera system is the Fuji XE2 and I've got mainly prime lenses; 14, 23,35 & 60 (as well as the 55-200). It's certainly a lot lighter than the FF Canon camera and lenses I moved from and I love taking my camera out.
My camera of choice if I'm just off out not specifically to take photos, but to give me reasonable image quality is the Panasonic LX7.
I've recently been thinking about selling this and purchasing one of the Fuji X100's as an upgrade for better image quality and to then only be running one system which should make post processing easier.
However the X100's are fixed lenses.
My most used lens on the XE2 is the 23mm so from that point of view a lighter pocket able 35mm equivalent would seem logical.
Would it be madness to give up the 24-90 equivalent of the LX7 for a 35mm fixed, how much extra reach would I get by the extra megapixels of the X100 allowing me to crop in....?
Ramblings....
My camera of choice if I'm just off out not specifically to take photos, but to give me reasonable image quality is the Panasonic LX7.
I've recently been thinking about selling this and purchasing one of the Fuji X100's as an upgrade for better image quality and to then only be running one system which should make post processing easier.
However the X100's are fixed lenses.
My most used lens on the XE2 is the 23mm so from that point of view a lighter pocket able 35mm equivalent would seem logical.
Would it be madness to give up the 24-90 equivalent of the LX7 for a 35mm fixed, how much extra reach would I get by the extra megapixels of the X100 allowing me to crop in....?
Ramblings....