- Messages
- 267
- Edit My Images
- No
Hey guys,
I'm going to be spending 6 months in Hong Kong. My current gear is
5Dmk3
24-70 F2.8L
50mm F1.8
85mm F1.8
Canon EOS-m with 22mm F2.0 (35mm f2.0 equiv) and 18-55 IS
I have to get one lens to replace my damaged Sigma 70-200 F2.8 (insurance replacement). At the moment i am torn between the Sigma 35mm F1.4 Art, and the Canon 16-35 F4L IS. I have read that the 17-40 F4L and the 16-35 F2.8L II are both quite poor compared to the 16-35 F4L IS, so have pretty much discounted them.
I think the 35mm will be absolutely great for the night markets and street photography etc, but i already have 35mm Covered by the 24-70 and the EOS-M's pancake, and bright lenses covered by the 50mm and 85mm.
On the other hand, i have absolutely nothing that is wider than 24mm, so any dramatic land/cityscapes are not covered.
For reference, the 16-35 F4L IS will cost me £350 more than the 35mm, and i think the 35mm will perhaps be a better option long term for my professional work.
One other option is to get the 35mm now, and add a 17-40 F4L whilst over there as they are significantly cheaper...this option might actually work out not much more expensive than just a 16-35 F4L IS on its own!
Sorry for the rambling, I'm hoping someone may be able to offer some thoughts, especially anyone that has spent any time in the city!
Thanks,
Tom.
I'm going to be spending 6 months in Hong Kong. My current gear is
5Dmk3
24-70 F2.8L
50mm F1.8
85mm F1.8
Canon EOS-m with 22mm F2.0 (35mm f2.0 equiv) and 18-55 IS
I have to get one lens to replace my damaged Sigma 70-200 F2.8 (insurance replacement). At the moment i am torn between the Sigma 35mm F1.4 Art, and the Canon 16-35 F4L IS. I have read that the 17-40 F4L and the 16-35 F2.8L II are both quite poor compared to the 16-35 F4L IS, so have pretty much discounted them.
I think the 35mm will be absolutely great for the night markets and street photography etc, but i already have 35mm Covered by the 24-70 and the EOS-M's pancake, and bright lenses covered by the 50mm and 85mm.
On the other hand, i have absolutely nothing that is wider than 24mm, so any dramatic land/cityscapes are not covered.
For reference, the 16-35 F4L IS will cost me £350 more than the 35mm, and i think the 35mm will perhaps be a better option long term for my professional work.
One other option is to get the 35mm now, and add a 17-40 F4L whilst over there as they are significantly cheaper...this option might actually work out not much more expensive than just a 16-35 F4L IS on its own!
Sorry for the rambling, I'm hoping someone may be able to offer some thoughts, especially anyone that has spent any time in the city!
Thanks,
Tom.