The Official Fuji X10/X20/X30/XF1/XQ1 Thread

On the X10 the Panorama Sweep works just about every which way possible; so I would guess the X20 will be the same.
Doing panos with the camera held vertical is an easy way to get a wider field of view in the pano.
 
Yes, it works in any direction just follow the arrow of choice.
I find it best to only use the up/down arrows, and turn the camera so that the maximum width (height) is used in the landscape option too.

Rhodese.

Drat and double drat, Duncan beat me to it.
 
Last edited:
thanks guys ,doing a vertical panorama should be interesting
Here's one I took at an indoor festival :)
20120506-145702-DSCF9813-L.jpg
 
I've done overhead pans of a market in Crete. Set it to 180 degrees and away I went! 360s can have the same person in at least 3 times and even 120s can have 2 of one person. Of course, a "real" pan can have many more but not without a load of stitching!
 
Nigel, that’s a cracking shot. I have just been looking at your Flickr pictures, if they don’t sell the X10s virtues nothing will, great shots, well done, well done little X.

Rhodese.
 
Been looking for a pocketable camera for those occasions when I don't want to be encumbered by anything bigger, and ended up buying an XF1 from the refurb shop for £135 - and something of a bargain it is. I am pleasantly surprised by its abilities, especially in low light situations.

These 2 snaps were taken using the pro-low light mode, and have exceeded my expectations - I know that they aren't best framed and lack a little sharpness, but I notice that the second one at least was taken at ISO3200! No wonder theres some noise in the shadows.

11176157836_c114bbd11c_c.jpg


11176300163_7a1a5b9470_c.jpg


I also rather like the slight ghosting of movement that the pro-low light mode gives.

All in all a recommended little camera.

regards,

Iain
 
Great pictures and good news - I have just bought an XF1 too. Can't wait for it to arrive!


Hi, You'll not be dissapointed they are terrific little cameras. My wife has one and I have made A3+ prints from some of her shots that are of a very high image quality from such a small unit. "Enjoy".
 
Long been an advocate for the XF-1, it's probably the one camera I would keep if I had to pick just one. Bought it in tan since I preferred the texture of the "leather" covering to that of the black but then bought a black (heavier textured) case for it to match my car's interior (yup, I'm that sad!). Originally went to the shop to handle a 1 series Nikon and an X-10 Fuji but walked out with the XF-1 due to its pocketability. Ironically (or perhaps inevitably!), I now have an X-20 and 2 1 series Nikons as well as the XF-1!!!
 

Nice one Nigel, almost surreal. More kudos for the mighty X10, and yourself of course :)

Taking my XF1 out tonight for the first time. We (my camera and I) are going to a restaurant with others. Should I go with AUTO, EXR or a mode scene. Camera bought for easiness and not fiddling. Sarah
Let us know how you get on and post some shots Sarah, I'm seriously thinking about an XF1, the X10 is just a smidgen too large for my pockets on night's out!
With my other EXR Fujis I usually set EXR to high sensitivity/low noise (SN) as I don't like using flash in restaurants.
 
One of the (many) joys of the XF-1 is that it's so unobtrusive and looks like a far less capable tool than it is! Have a quick play at home in lowish light and see which settings give you the results you want - if that means a bit of flash, use it! Every other bu99er will be, on their commercialmas suppers!

Jim, the XF-1 was the first of the baby X series that I bought. I went to the shop to see which of either the X-10 or Nikon 1 series was the most pocketable - neither of them are but "Try this" and I walked out with the XF. I've since had an X-10 (now sold to a friend) and currently have an X-20 and a couple of 1 series Nikons, all of which serve different purposes but none of which slip easily into a shirt pocket!
 
intended to buy the x20 as a 2nd camera in the new year, but this seems a better bet
quality and more compact size, no viewfinder of course
is the xf1 screen unusable when the sun shines ?
 
Last edited:
No. (In a word!) I used mine a lot in Crete during the summer and you can't get much further south in Europe. You can set the screen brightness to high for those conditions, although that does eat into battery life.

I've said before that IF I had to choose just one camera from the (too?!) many I have, it would be the XF-1 but I would miss all the others! Not sure if the deal's still on but Currys/PCWorld were knocking the XF-1 out for £200. Well worth more than that!
 
Thanks for that info nod
Currys currently have the XF1 for £150 with an extra 10% off
now a great price of £135
 
Last edited:
Get it before they run out!
 
My love/hate relationship with the X10 contiunes. At the moment it's back in favour again. :D

I thought I'd try it to take 'product' shots to illustrate my fishing blog. I've messed around with all sorts of set ups using a DSLR and never been fully happy. So I stuck my SB900 set to Auto on the X10 and bounced the light off the ceiling. Good enough for me, and no messing about with lighting stands and stuff. For the time being it's become my 'studio' camera! :)

DSCF6945.jpg


It's been to a poultry show:

DSCF6798.jpg


DSCF6803.jpg


And round town:

DSCF6861.jpg


Still wishing the viewfinder was accurate though.
 
My love/hate relationship with the X10 contiunes. At the moment it's back in favour again. :D







And round town:

DSCF6861.jpg


Still wishing the viewfinder was accurate though.


the viewfinder on my X20 is more accurate than my X10 But you Just have to learn to aim off a bit like shooting a gun.
 
If parallax errors are a real problem, use the rear screen rather than the OVF for those shots.
 
The only thing I get pernickity about in making photographs is framing the shot - so it's every shot I (reluctantly) use the rear screen for. I know it's a personal idiosyncrasy, but I find I 'see' pictures better with the camera to my eye, and find making slight framing adjustments easier that way than with it held at arm's length.

If the camera had an electronic view finder I'd be happy as a happy thing with the X10 because I like everything else about it. Daft as it sounds I think it's going to become a tripod camera when I don't mind using the rear screen. There might be another X series camera in my future though!
 
As nice at it might be to get perfect framing in every shot, it's all but impossible, even with SLRs. At the taking stage, few cameras have absolutely 100% viewfinders and even fewer print labs print the full image, unless the image is reduced in size while leaving the canvas at their standard print size, leaving a border. Of course, you could be a home printer and so have the complete control (other than the potential gamut problems) that allows.
Having grown up got older with film and lab printing (as well as doing a fair bit of D&P myself in B&W days), I'm used to effectively leaving a little space round a subject knowing that the 'border' will be cropped by the lab (or me at PP stage), or in the case of a non 100% VF, knowing that there's a little extra to play with that I can't see through the VF.
There is another benefit of using the screen - the extra info it holds over that supplied by the X-20's OVF overlay (or even none from the X-10 - my main reason for upgrading to the X-20). In my case, the artificial horizon is invaluable since I have real problems keeping the sea from flowing out of the frame without it!
Of course, traditionally the photographer HAD to use a screen on the back of the camera - thankfully, these days that screen is bright enough to see without a black sheet covering us and the camera back!
 
I guess we're all different. I've become used to DSLR with a 100% (or very close) viewfinder, and latterly an EVF. Even with a 95% finder cropping is simple as everything is still centred in the frame - rather than some bits chopped off at the edges!

As for screen info - I prefer as little as possible and none in the picture area. The X10 screen annoys me because even with info switched off it reappears as soon as you half press the shutter release. Unless there is a cure for that. I agree that sloping horizons are a pain and that sort of overlay can be useful. Although I'm getting to be less worried by wonky shots - unless it is the sea which is sloping!

If the files from my Panasonic G2 were a match for those from the X10 I'd be sorted. The screen, and EVF, can be set to show the info in a border around the picture area. You get a smaller picture to look at - but it's exactly what you'll get to print out. Functionally the G2 does exactly what I want a small camera to do - it even has back button focus. But the colours in the files are beyond my ability to get the way I want them - and it blows highlights at the drop of a hat. If only I could cross that body with the Fuji sensor I'd have camera perfection! But I think that is just a dream. :LOL:
 
It's a nice dream but still just a dream! :D
 
I've just purchased a fuji xq1 which is essentially the X20's sensor in an XF1's body + lens with a zoom motor! :LOL:

With all the similarities I hope you guys won't mind me posting my photies in this thread. I'm really looking forward to getting the camera as I was a huge fan of my x10 before I sold it to upgrade to an XE-1. I've used a sony rx100 (and this camera is basically a direct competitor/copy of the rx100) so I'll be comparing it to that.
I managed to get it for £250 from digitalrev which is a huge £100 saving on the usually good amazon price. I'll let you all know how it performs when it arrives :)
 
TBH, I haven't noticed any differences in real life between images from the X-10 and X-20 and the XF-1 shares the guts with the X-10. I love my XF-1, in at least part due to the fully manual zoom which seems to have been dropped in the XQ and would be tempted to get another at the Currys/PCWorld price ATM!

I'm sure nobody'll mind you sharing the XQ's results - this thread is for all the baby X Fujis (as in the compacts rather than the CSCs!)
 
the viewfinder on my X20 is more accurate than my X10 But you Just have to learn to aim off a bit like shooting a gun.
A bit like rangefinders of the olden days, you soon get used to it though
Allan
 
Reading through the later posts on this thread, it seems the XF1 get good things said about it. I have fancied one for a while and love the looks, and now that Currys are selling them very cheaply, I thought I might get one.
So, what are they really like? I want a truly pocketable camera with images up to the same standard as my old X10. Is this it? Will it compliment my other two X cameras? (20 and 100s)
Allan
 
Back
Top