Not for the kind of parp you photograph.
still cant taken decent moon pics. guess i need to stop trying haha
still cant taken decent moon pics. guess i need to stop trying haha
Nice moon here not got a d750 to take a image of it
I got some pics earlier when it was clear. Just not very good ones. I think I've tried every permantation to get one and still won't happen [emoji35]
Nice moon here not got a d750 to take a image of it
Why? Is the moon only useful to ff users?
I got some pics earlier when it was clear. Just not very good ones. I think I've tried every permantation to get one and still won't happen [emoji35]
As minnnt says what's the issue? Why don't you post up an example to see if we can offer advice?What's your issue mate?
moon 1 by Mark Kingston, on Flickr
moon 2 by Mark Kingston, on Flickr
i just cant seem to get them right not sure what is going on.
perhaps its the sigma or its just me but @Paulie-W seems about 10 times sharper than these.
On a tripod with a remote, os off.
Single point focus. Pp is in camera raw adjust levels and then just sharpen a little in cs6 that's it.
Does camera RAW have clarity and dehaze?
You should have a go with MF too. LV, 100% zoom in. Are you not at 600mm because 500 is better?
Thank you very muchGive the clarity and contrast a boost and it should help to make it pop.
They don't look too bad. When I downloaded the originals they are a bit soft, maybe it's the atmosphere or maybe it's your focussing. I've tried LV both Af and MF and actually find AF gives just as good results. Mfing on a 600mm lens that you then zoom in on is quite tricky as the image in the VF moves a lot ime. I'd also increase focal length to 550mm. I do think that you can enhance them further in PP too, I had a quick play but only using the jpegs from your flickr so not much flexibility.moon 1 by Mark Kingston, on Flickr
moon 2 by Mark Kingston, on Flickr
i just cant seem to get them right not sure what is going on.
perhaps its the sigma or its just me but @Paulie-W seems about 10 times sharper than these.
On a tripod with a remote, os off.
They don't look too bad. When I downloaded the originals they are a bit soft, maybe it's the atmosphere or maybe it's your focussing. I've tried LV both Af and MF and actually find AF gives just as good results. Mfing on a 600mm lens that you then zoom in on is quite tricky as the image in the VF moves a lot ime. I'd also increase focal length to 550mm. I do think that you can enhance them further in PP too, I had a quick play but only using the jpegs from your flickr so not much flexibility.
Cheers for all the replies. I'll keep at it and try the lv next time. As by the time I read all these replies the cloud have come over.Clarity, Contrast, and pretty much everything else is what I used ... Don`t be put off though mate
Here's one of my better examples, EXIF shows the settings. I can't remember if I used MF or LV AF for this though.Cheers for all the replies. I'll keep at it and try the lv next time. As by the time I read all these replies the cloud have come over.
Hopefully at the weekend I should be out weather permitting to see if I can get some bird in flight owl action.
I'd best get a d500 first thou. [emoji6]
ThanksReally like that, Toby!
It snowed here in South Yorks for about 5 minutes. It's just grey and dark now.Still no snow shots what is going on. I would of thought someone on here would of had some snow .
I will have soon I hope as it just started but it won't be in here lol
Look forward to seeing your landscapes [emoji6]Yes snake is pretty slippery at the moment. Snow on losehill and mam tor as I see those from my window [emoji106]