Nikon D750 & D780

AndyFo said:
Oh sh1t that's not so good, I'm hoping that's only on the Cannon and that it will be better on Nikon, ever the optimist Ay.
Click to expand...
Just had a look at the 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG Flickr group and it looks good to me (y)
 
Chuckoir said:
Anyone used the Sigma 24-105 f4? How does it compare to the Nikon 24-120?
Click to expand...

Gets decent enough reviews. Some say better than the Nikon, but depends if you want the extra reach. Similar sizes with the Siggy a tad heavier.
 
AndyFo said:
I don't really understand a lot of these test reports, this is the one by dxomark that I looked at and it seemed to be quite complimentary.
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Pu...DG-HSM-an-old-cheap-and-great-wide-angle-lens
Click to expand...
I find just looking at a sample pool more useful than scores TBH. Scores can be useful, but they tell you little about how a lens renders, what the colours are like etc etc. Sift through enough sample images and you start to build a picture of what a lens is like. Obviously you'll see some stunners, some shockers, and everything else in between ;)
 
JJ! said:
Gets decent enough reviews. Some say better than the Nikon, but depends if you want the extra reach. Similar sizes with the Siggy a tad heavier.
Click to expand...
Again this is where tests can be misleading. DXO once more haven't tested the Sigma on Nikon, but in the 5D4 it scores a lot higher than the 24-120mm on the D750. But if you look at this, the Nikon looks sharper to me wide open at the long end, and that's with 15mm more reach. At 24mm it's pretty equal IMO, although the Nikon shows a lot more CA (can't say I've noticed this particularly on mine). Again though it's not comparing the same camera.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/...meraComp=614&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0
 
JJ! said:
Gets decent enough reviews. Some say better than the Nikon, but depends if you want the extra reach. Similar sizes with the Siggy a tad heavier.
Click to expand...
Cheers. It'd be replacing the 24--85mm, so I'd be getting 20 more mm anyway which, according to my wife, is quite a lot. ;)

My 50mm 1.8 developed a weird colour cast over Xmas. :D

Processed Joe by Chuckoir, on Flickr

Lightroom and Leffe don't mix too well...
 
Chuckoir said:
Okay - how do you find the Siggy?
Click to expand...
I don't find them, I buy them [emoji13] [emoji12]
Tbh I don't think mine is set up right, needs someone with good eyes to fine tune this lens for me (I got Crap eyes) maybe have a nosey on over at my Flickr but I don't think there's too many on there tbh.
 
Chuckoir said:
Anyone used the Sigma 24-105 f4? How does it compare to the Nikon 24-120?
Click to expand...

Yes have had two of them, one on the D750 and one before Christmas on my D810. I like the feel/look of Sigma lenses at present, but I have found some focus inconsistencies on them both, along with the 24-35mm f2 and found them hard MFA even with the dock..... I would get them good at one length and then knock it slowly out at the opposite length. I have also had three Nikon 24-120mm f4 and the first two (on D750) I thought they were just okay lenses, but the last one I had (on D810) was the best, but like a t*** I sold it and have regretted it. So in summary, the Nikon versions pips it for me, but I do prefer the contrast more with Sigma lenses.
 
Just remembered that the donkey photos are taken with the 24-105.
 
Swanseajack said:
Yes have had two of them, one on the D750 and one before Christmas on my D810. I like the feel/look of Sigma lenses at present, but I have found some focus inconsistencies on them both, along with the 24-35mm f2 and found them hard MFA even with the dock..... I would get them good at one length and then knock it slowly out at the opposite length. I have also had three Nikon 24-120mm f4 and the first two (on D750) I thought they were just okay lenses, but the last one I had (on D810) was the best, but like a t*** I sold it and have regretted it. So in summary, the Nikon versions pips it for me, but I do prefer the contrast more with Sigma lenses.
Click to expand...
I've heard mixed reports about the 24-120mm f4, and after chatting to someone whilst out taking landscapes I gave it a wide berth for a while. However, I decided to buy one eventually and glad I did as I've been very impressed with mine. Whether I've just got a good copy I don't know, but I like it (y) Few examples taken with my 24-120mm ;)


DSC_2318-3 by TDG-77, on Flickr

Ballerina 2 by TDG-77, on Flickr

DSC_1413 by TDG-77, on Flickr

DSC_6883-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr

DSC_3317 by TDG-77, on Flickr

DSC_0758 by TDG-77, on Flickr

DSC_1776 B&W crop by TDG-77, on Flickr

DSC_1664 by TDG-77, on Flickr
 
it's a very useful range and if you get a good copy it can produce very nice shots, as your images show.
 
@snerkler Like I said the last 24-120mm f4 I had on the D810 was excellent at all focal lengths, compared to the previous two which were just okay for me.

A large crop at the far(ish) end at 110mm and wide open at f4, you can count the eyelashes easily.

What your last photo like, the bride, when cropped in tight on the eye?

Testing Nikon 24-120mm f4. by Swansea Jack, on Flickr
 
Swanseajack said:
@snerkler Like I said the last 24-120mm f4 I had on the D810 was excellent at all focal lengths, compared to the previous two which were just okay for me.

A large crop at the far(ish) end at 110mm and wide open at f4, you can count the eyelashes easily.

What your last photo like, the bride, when cropped in tight on the eye?

Testing Nikon 24-120mm f4. by Swansea Jack, on Flickr
Click to expand...
Dunno TBH, I'm away from the computer so will check later.
 
Some interesting skies down by the sea today. For some reason square seemed to work to my eyes.

FG9MW2WtqzfcGIur2wR-UiSplbN_0F9JOSWAFn04_rx3caZuBZedNf7BzC-8aTTQjNbbc-_cTBah4nuBAhw7DyJ90bNpIeFBbQfYNLmFlxD4b_eRBXFFrgg3nQjiCpoJNW1z4iQujQwm8ojsTwl_o9SuJm8JnT2KWiKuRv1Xkn3cjbszE5iR3WTvsTz5xliTEb24fmcfnX2zTD5JRlGPwhiWriotTN921YsHtipN1c2pY_T2t3_4c5la3RIjpe5GVYeTnB4BiHzvjNwCis47zUJRIMjbVwYEuav9wstGV9tN9yX4aaPfuFXoXffqwp8zQhpic_8ul__RojShQ1yjeEmUo8KPPbbChxxiUzG4j-3sXxrYixZUJMdQTtGjCQIWxUKm2rPr2c0NBCu6busvT2Gy_rZpAXEl89iIGvb0nrp1uYe9reodn9l_HXXehtaaID0fpojGiv11h73FRomC2QCrxgrnnnU6t4lrv88e1jt1dANVoO6th1BPeJ2RFqrKFDQ0NtVQgaM6v8vNvGdsWWuFYJ_Z35eT-6xqOOwXnrJ-QfNg573AYYpTagTwjB5VKrVTTJmQxadz5nu47sm3jHq1BnkvlVBL121LVW2FaoixhuTZhdIWhw=s711-no


Zd8vh8Hy0uN1hpGE53WwcyIRYGcxC-hzgt7JCQtObBgcZ9RVwN88nTGTwiGhtWyVDaitbL_UUwQ_hkChD8VpGfFyoDIRgoHoUQ2nrTkU49dKY6zonws6Eyry60xjn2VemsL7OE5j5Vca1-iDirX2dNfsLLpR1En8-F236WnEwjrNYrmSE9pU_X3M8tMhPov0gyCdCLpz280NzCACvQLW0oRgwiwvjBanwSvm11PYa9-G8froWN0TUKZ3EafftSH_U2CDm8bQLWc_nXTLvLbUaEYUkTRbqOj3xenW1JofxwkEm6OMrkUOh5sBp0WJI7ukLFnj8rlbtA_hhv4lXGuhfACTXflslrz4UjKQuedCDXgdIH69k9DCjcX95Bk8bNzKAXtYYwjwwFDh0m1-dQOXNtj_jgZgWNx3tGK574jbHuCd3mPBdSOhKFIawqoHgmcs4pHtMojreIKy2VKBRTLXeku1N3Xc0ryDwxNKqpaswJHBLoHrA-xl_4cwujDyyJJvkx7TcSQz-_tICehf8K1ZmuZ26CMqJVP1QZJwVgM3Bbs7UgnEkO25yCMgjzgWFuAc1UxBVX8AfOK5uieTt4tUuJdHT8m-gZFXe7mTKiCMQ5IOA4HU3Somng=s711-no
 
kingo15 said:
The old man by Mark Kingston, on Flickr

ive just been told to put this on canvas and its allowed to go on the wall in the lounge so she must happy :):)
Click to expand...
Dunno if it me or what Exif in Flickr not showing for me again it happened once before... What Aperture was that at please and I guess you focus bridge of nose?
 
The exif has disappeared and i cant find the orignal either.

it would of either been 1.8 on the 50mm or 85mm, dont think i used the 70-200 for that one.

normally i aim for a eye tbh
 
rookies said:
Dunno if it me or what Exif in Flickr not showing for me again it happened once before... What Aperture was that at please and I guess you focus bridge of nose?
Click to expand...
Looks like it's on the eyes to me, which is where you want it ;)
 
rookies said:
But how did he get both i.e. in focus is it cos dog looking straight on
Click to expand...
Yes. Have you learnt about plane of focus yet that I mentioned when commenting on the pic you took of the dog bone on the D500 thread?
 
Had a quick play with the D500 yesterday, didn't get on with the grip compared to the D750, felt more like the D810 which just didn't feel right with my knackered hand. At least it's put that bit of GAS for a 'backup' crop body to bed ;)
 
snerkler said:
Had a quick play with the D500 yesterday, didn't get on with the grip compared to the D750, felt more like the D810 which just didn't feel right with my knackered hand. At least it's put that bit of GAS for a 'backup' crop body to bed ;)
Click to expand...

Yeah mine went back pretty quickly!
 
T_J_G said:
Really nice shots, think you've done really well. What did B&G think?
Click to expand...

kingo15 said:
very nice, bet they must be over the moon with those.
Click to expand...

Thanks chaps, seemed really pleased yesterday, were really happy with how I managed it during the day too They want an album so a bit more to do yet, but I had a fancy USB done for them with a slideshow and a dozen prints to give them an idea. Actually enjoyed doing this one, I think the workflow is a little better these days.
 
Livin The Dream said:
Thanks chaps, seemed really pleased yesterday, were really happy with how I managed it during the day too They want an album so a bit more to do yet, but I had a fancy USB done for them with a slideshow and a dozen prints to give them an idea. Actually enjoyed doing this one, I think the workflow is a little better these days.
Click to expand...

The key is enjoying it, I didn't relax on my first couple but did for the last one and the difference in pictures is massive!
 
I've done 3 for friends and I've pooped my pants on everyone. Vowed never to do any more. To this day I've managed it. [emoji1]
 
T_J_G said:
The key is enjoying it, I didn't relax on my first couple but did for the last one and the difference in pictures is massive!
Click to expand...

Agree with this Tim. I was quite relaxed for this one, I knew there wasn't scope for anything ultra funky, just had to get the shots. I wish I had have not bothered with flash at all during the ceremony. Up to the ceremony I was bouncing off the ceiling just to take away the spot light effect. Those shots look so crisp and perfect. Took me a bit of faffing to find a look that was consistent in PP, but I can still see the difference. Also had a flash overheat for the first time right at th back end of the speeches, so ramping up the exposure to compensate gives a slight difference in look to a few of those. I had left the spares in my bag which wasn't feasible to get at quickly. Little things, but overall I'm happy.
 
Seeing as it was tipping down with rain here i decided to go through my ext harddrive and upload some of my old stuff from my d7100.

Forgot how capable it was in good light. You can definatley notice the difference at higher iso thou. Still dont regret getting the d750 thou
 
It`s crap out I know. I`m bored ****less ;) Might try some smoke pix later. Need to trudge out in the wet n nasty though first.
 
I'm shooting at 12:40 today first competition since September last year. Hate shooting in the wet. Not looking forward to it. But it's got to be done as I've got a busy competition year ahead of me. So need to split my time [emoji20]
 
kingo15 said:
I'm shooting at 12:40 today first competition since September last year. Hate shooting in the wet. Not looking forward to it. But it's got to be done as I've got a busy competition year ahead of me. So need to split my time [emoji20]
Click to expand...
Photography competition, or...?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top