- Messages
- 2,041
- Edit My Images
- Yes
But surely they must have a warranty with them.
Why would he want to change? Cause it's rookies [emoji1]
Nikon D750 & D780
- Thread starter Joeturner11
- Start date
Why would he want to change? Cause it's rookies [emoji1]
- Messages
- 23,598
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Dunno tbh, will wait to see what format say. TBH their customer service has been second to none in the past.
- Messages
- 9,590
- Edit My Images
- Yes
You guys are all so young
- Messages
- 18,233
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
They should come in handy for you when shooting out of your bedroom window.
You certainly look young in your avatar.
- Messages
- 940
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- Yes
To be honest with you, mate, if I posted a selfie people would find it hard to tell yourself and me apart.They should come in handy for you when shooting out of your bedroom window.
You certainly look young in your avatar.
Cus us gingers all look the same, innit?
- Messages
- 18,233
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
To be honest with you, mate, if I posted a selfie people would find it hard to tell yourself and me apart.
Cus us gingers all look the same, innit?
Get on it.
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
If you want the f2.8 yes, if not then no
Probably not... but thats not too stop the gas!!!
Plus Im thinking for equestrian it might give better subject isolation?
Last edited:
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
I can't compare as I've never used the f4, but you should most definitely do it.
Because f2.8.
Out of interest, is the the VRII version, or the newer 'E' model?
Its the new one that came out last year - hence I'm not 100% sure if I can afford what the difference might be. I have a work bonus coming next month, but its one of the awkward conversations were a price has not been given!!
Plus not sure I can justfy the cost just yet... will see!
Last edited:
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
All other things considered equal a wider aperture will always give more subject isolation
Yeah I did see that. I'm not 100% sold on the idea. I think I just want a new toy! I can try it out first to compare to the F4 version.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 23,598
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Took a trip to Magpie Mine. Unfortunately weather was not my friend so I'll have to go back at some point. Heavy use of radial filters to make the light look better than it was.
DSC_6506-Edit-3 by TDG-77, on Flickr
DSC_6508-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
Edit, halos removed.
DSC_6506-Edit-3 by TDG-77, on Flickr
DSC_6508-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
Edit, halos removed.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 8,011
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Took a trip to Magpie Mine. Unfortunately weather was not my friend so I'll have to go back at some point. Heavy use of radial filters to make the light look better than it was.
DSC_6506-Edit-3 by TDG-77, on Flickr
DSC_6508-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
Like those, but I am a LE junkie, keystone police will be after you on the first one though
- Messages
- 8,063
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
Took a trip to Magpie Mine. Unfortunately weather was not my friend so I'll have to go back at some point. Heavy use of radial filters to make the light look better than it was.
Really like those Toby they are lovely images.. Sometime we don't always needs light. I like that kind of images some people don't..
- Messages
- 940
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Took a trip to Magpie Mine. Unfortunately weather was not my friend so I'll have to go back at some point. Heavy use of radial filters to make the light look better than it was.
And not a big pussy in sight...
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
All other things considered equal a wider aperture will always give more subject isolation
Same with the new Tamron too - both looks pretty similar. Guess the Tamron will be a bit cheaper though.
- Messages
- 23,598
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Thanks. Lol, I did actually did a corrected version but preferred the distortionLike those, but I am a LE junkie, keystone police will be after you on the first one though
Thanks Andy
- Messages
- 7,329
- Name
- Graham
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I like the 2nd one, not so cluttered, maybe although it's just my opinion, it could do with a little lift in colour/pop.Took a trip to Magpie Mine. Unfortunately weather was not my friend so I'll have to go back at some point. Heavy use of radial filters to make the light look better than it was.
- Messages
- 7,329
- Name
- Graham
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Well get out there and take some photos man.....
- Messages
- 23,598
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 23,598
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Thanks. Trust me it's been lifted a lot already lol. Not much I can do about the flat light, and I don't know photoshop enough to make artificial light
- Messages
- 8,063
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
I will be doing. Not today tripod be blown over right away
- Messages
- 23,598
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Given it a further contrast boost, but don't think I can squeeze out any more popThanks. Trust me it's been lifted a lot already lol. Not much I can do about the flat light, and I don't know photoshop enough to make artificial light
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
Will see what it's like! Am also tempted by one of these massive 150-600s too!
- Messages
- 7,896
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 23,598
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
I assume you mean the halos? Dunno why they're so bad with these but will clone them out when I have time
The chimney seems the worst affected to me. Dunno whether long exposures cause more CA's?