- Messages
- 1,264
- Name
- Mark
- Edit My Images
- Yes
its called a tutorial and the images are STOCKWould have been better if your actually took the photos yourself other than ripping it off youtube.
hardly, its still creativeOk might have been an idea to mention this in the original post and not post it in creative photography?
Bulb looks a little messy to me, otherwise cool idea.
its called a tutorial and the images are STOCK
hahaha
Ok my thoughts were wheres the creativity? You didn't create the images, you used the images created by someone else and and you followed a series of instructions as to how to achieve it, hence an identical image produced by someone else.hardly, its still creative
We're both learning techniques and I'd have thought that the fact we've both come up with similar but different interpretations shows some sort of creativity even if someone has been kind enough to give us a good idea on how to create this subject and given us links to the files we're allowed to use and how to use them creatively.Ok my thoughts were wheres the creativity?
And what's wrong with painting by numbers if we're learning different techniques on how to use Photoshop? Surely, painting by numbers is how we learned how to draw and use colours when we were young, and then later on progressed to using our own imagination. Surely the same sort of learning and method applies to Photoshop, the program being a very complicated "animal" to learn?but it's not creative when you're painting by numbers
Please excuse my "attack"/rat in a corner mode but in defence of the above ...
We're both learning techniques and I'd have thought that the fact we've both come up with similar but different interpretations shows some sort of creativity even if someone has been kind enough to give us a good idea on how to create this subject and given us links to the files we're allowed to use and how to use them creatively.
And what's wrong with painting by numbers if we're learning different techniques on how to use Photoshop? Surely, painting by numbers is how we learned how to draw and use colours when we were young, and then later on progressed to using our own imagination. Surely the same sort of learning and method applies to Photoshop, the program being a very complicated "animal" to learn?
Please excuse my "attack"/rat in a corner mode but in defence of the above ...
We're both learning techniques and I'd have thought that the fact we've both come up with similar but different interpretations shows some sort of creativity even if someone has been kind enough to give us a good idea on how to create this subject and given us links to the files we're allowed to use and how to use them creatively.
And what's wrong with painting by numbers if we're learning different techniques on how to use Photoshop? Surely, painting by numbers is how we learned how to draw and use colours when we were young, and then later on progressed to using our own imagination. Surely the same sort of learning and method applies to Photoshop, the program being a very complicated "animal" to learn?
It would have been more creative if, having learned the techniques, you applied them to something original..
We're both learning techniques and I'd have thought that the fact we've both come up with similar but different interpretations shows some sort of creativity even if someone has been kind enough to give us a good idea on how to create this subject and given us links to the files we're allowed to use and how to use them creatively.
Awesome idea reckon it could work with a light bulb thats on too
I've seen it done where a larger light bulb was dismantled carefully and the water/fish actually put in it, just for the photo shoot.
I think this is an example, it was very similarCool would love to see that one