It has a specific effect. It can reduce or intensify reflections or glitter from water, glass, glossy leaves, polished surfaces, etc., and can darken or lighten part of a blue sky (because blue sky is polarised circularly around the position of the sun). So sometimes it can be a useful effect in some photographs in certain lighting conditions. It's not really "for" any specific kind of photography. It could be useful in some landscape shots to reduce the glitter from diffusely backlit foliage, and annoying in other landscape shots where it would selectively darken some of the blue sky, and lighten another part. It could be useful in zoos photographing some animals behind glass, or an annoying loss of light when photographing a fidgeting animal in dim light.I'd just to ask you about CP filter as I know it's for either landscape or streetscape. But if I ask anyone who's been using this filter for general like outdoor portrait or zoo???
I'd just to ask you about CP filter as I know it's for either landscape or streetscape. But if I ask anyone who's been using this filter for general like outdoor portrait or zoo???
I have one but found it disappointing - it doesn't work like a conventional polariser where you can rotate the filter to an optimal position, and it just gives a half-hearted effect while making the viewfinder dim from loss of 2 stops.
All polarising filters can be rotated (they'd be useless without) and work exactly like a linear polariser. If you're not seeing the effect, then you're not using it properly. Read up on angles to the sun for darkening blue skies, and the critical angles for reducing reflections.
Thank you for the advice. I've used a linear polariser for many years, but the circular device I have does not behave the same, possibly inferior for some reason, but it simply doesn't work the same way.