The Fabulous Fuji X owners thread

@dave.hallett , I have no problem with sharpness of my 10-24 at any aperture, even fully stopped down where I would/should experience diffraction.

EDIT

This is a 3-shot merge with the 10-24 at f11, through 3 filters.

Wain Wath, Swaledale by Stephen Lee, on Flickr

The 10-24mm is "Excellent" Sir, I've used mine both wide open and down to F11 without any sharpness problems whatsoever. It does soften up just a tad at the longer end (most zooms do) but is still extremely good and perfectly usable. In my user opinion the 18-55mm is a very good lens and should never be labelled a kit lens but optically the 10-24mm is sharper. (y)

George.

Thank you both, gentlemen. Stephen there's certainly some nice fine detail there, I must agree. Particularly as the HDR process doesn't always help matters.

I don't usually bother with MTF charts, but a quick check on some reviews confirms my impression that the Tokina 12-24 is best at 5.6, and that the 10-24 should be very good at least to f/11. It looks as though some loss of central sharpness might be apparent at f/16 if you compared tripod shots, but I'm quite prepared to believe that it's still good enough for most purposes. This lens probably lies in my future...Just not the very close future :)
 
Not as amusing as the previous picture, but an example of my adapted zoom being what I would call "satisfactory", for those who find this of any interest.

Bear in mind that it's overcast, so shot at ISO 800, and quite windy to boot. Maybe a touch painterly, but that's more me than the lens. Equally, pay no attention to the slight vignette, that's my idea of trying to be artistic :)

I did actually blend two exposures here, the centre of the image is at about f/5.6, the rest at about f/8 most likely, but you can only really see any difference at 100%.


Green Bridge of Christ Church
by David Hallett, on Flickr
 
Just traded all my Canon gear in for an X-T2, 18-55 and 10-24. The Canon gear was getting a bit heavy and long in the tooth (my main body was a 5D MkII).

Haven't had a chance to try out the Fuji properly so far, but hopefully I won't notice a reduction in quality moving from full frame back to APS-C.

Certainly feels very different in the hand !

I had the Canon 70D and both my X-T20 and X-T2 are a damn sight better the the 70D, I got the XC 50-230mm and tried it on the X-T20 at our airshow, got some of my best shots to date with the Fuji, even beating my old 70-200mm f4 L IS, best move I ever did coming to Fuji.
 
I needed an extra battery for the X-T20. Has anyone had any issues with the Ex-Pro versions? Would they be fine as a backup battery or best to stick to the official one?

There seems to be two variants of the Ex-Pro also. Which one's do you fellow Fuji users use?
Ex-Pro make excellent batteries. I prefer the White, but in reality there’s probably negligible difference.
 
Been a real wash out for me trying to doing any shooting but hopefully be up in the Lakes on my own this week.
Least I'm managing to sort some old stuff.

Red Sky at Night by Graham Norton, on Flickr

Fuji X-T2 and 16-55 f2.8


"Excellent" Fujigraph Sir, well composed, stunning colours, and some beautiful reflections.(y)

George.
 
Had heard bad things about processing Fuji RAW files in Lightroom but my initial test shots taken at the weekend seemed fine.

Maybe Adobe have improved things in the new version.
 
Had heard bad things about processing Fuji RAW files in Lightroom but my initial test shots taken at the weekend seemed fine.

Maybe Adobe have improved things in the new version.
As far as I'm concerned I've never encountered any problems, going back only to 2014 admittedly.

Shouldn't believe everything you read on the web.
 
I sharpen in LR 99% of the time and I never have the issue. I rarely ever do landscapes though, I should get out and give some a try and really go for this phenomenon
I more or less only shoot landscapes and have never noticed this phenomena. However, I don't view at more than 100%.
 
Just had a delivery - a Thingify pinhole "lens". Just had a quick play and with the X-T1 set to auto shutter speed, it seems to expose correctly. Next experiments will be with telecon and extension tubes to see how well it can be tricked into being a telephoto.
 
Just a simple tourist type Fujigraph taken of the famous London Eye & County Hall. I have actually already posted a high contrast mono version of this snap and someone suggested it should be left in colour. So here it is.:D

X-T2, 18-55mm Lens, 1/640th @ F8, ISO-200, Handheld.
London Eye And County Hall (C)-03158C by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

:ty: for looking., (y):fuji:

George.
There’s a case for either version. Personally for architecture and mechanical structures I usually prefer mono. But there’s sufficient colour detail in this, and in the sky, to make this iteration also interesting.
 
There’s a case for either version. Personally for architecture and mechanical structures I usually prefer mono. But there’s sufficient colour detail in this, and in the sky, to make this iteration also interesting.


Thank you kindly Sir, sure is appreciated.(y)

George.
 
Just a simple tourist type Fujigraph taken of the famous London Eye & County Hall. I have actually already posted a high contrast mono version of this snap and someone suggested it should be left in colour. So here it is.:D

X-T2, 18-55mm Lens, 1/640th @ F8, ISO-200, Handheld.
London Eye And County Hall (C)-03158C by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

:ty: for looking., (y):fuji:

George.

Wow George, those colours! Love it!!
 
Just a simple tourist type Fujigraph taken of the famous London Eye & County Hall. I have actually already posted a high contrast mono version of this snap and someone suggested it should be left in colour. So here it is.:D

X-T2, 18-55mm Lens, 1/640th @ F8, ISO-200, Handheld.
London Eye And County Hall (C)-03158C by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

:ty: for looking., (y):fuji:

George.
This is certainly a nice shot, but I think the mono has the edge. Mind you my other half would say the opposite. Horses for courses :)
 
what flashes are people using with their x-t2's? i was looking at the cheap Yongnuo ones but open to others
 
Don't think there's any difference flash-wise between the X-T1 and 2? I use an old Yongnuo 560 [original non digital display] with a set of cheap transmitter/receivers https://www.amazon.co.uk/Neewer-Cha...r=8-3&keywords=flash+transmitter+and+receiver

Still works fine for off cam flash after a few years use. All manual though, no TTL.


If I was buying another flash though I'd probably grab a Godox with trigger for Fuji X - gives HSS and TTL and is nice and cheap for the set - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Godox-Chan...F8&qid=1508914167&sr=1-23&keywords=godox+fuji
 
I have a dilemma. I bought a Fuji Xt2 a couple of months ago and love it. I also have a much loved ,well used, 6D Canon with about 5 Lenses 3 of them L lenses so represents a big investment. Since buying the Fuji, I made myself use it exclusively so I would get used to it and am torn. Do I sell my Canon stuff and invest in more Fuji lenses or keep both? Has anyone done this and have any advice, comments. Both are fantastic cameras and there is a weight consideration but I am really unsure if I will regret selling my 6D. I’d do the same kind of photography with both systems. I was going to buy the new Canon 6D mark 2 before I got the Fuji but it has disappointing reviews and my son had got the Xt2 and was really pleased with it. Any advice out there?
 
I have a dilemma. I bought a Fuji Xt2 a couple of months ago and love it. I also have a much loved ,well used, 6D Canon with about 5 Lenses 3 of them L lenses so represents a big investment. Since buying the Fuji, I made myself use it exclusively so I would get used to it and am torn. Do I sell my Canon stuff and invest in more Fuji lenses or keep both? Has anyone done this and have any advice, comments. Both are fantastic cameras and there is a weight consideration but I am really unsure if I will regret selling my 6D. I’d do the same kind of photography with both systems. I was going to buy the new Canon 6D mark 2 before I got the Fuji but it has disappointing reviews and my son had got the Xt2 and was really pleased with it. Any advice out there?
Several on here have had the same dilemma. I think the general approach has been to sell the Canon gear and concentrate on the Fuji. You don't say what sort of photgraphy you do but the X-T2 will handle just about every type of photgrpahy that you can throw at it. Lanscapes, motor sport, wildlife, weddings and portraits. All handled extremely well.
If you're going to do it then do it now - prices for the Canon gear will only fall.
 
I have a dilemma. I bought a Fuji Xt2 a couple of months ago and love it. I also have a much loved ,well used, 6D Canon with about 5 Lenses 3 of them L lenses so represents a big investment. Since buying the Fuji, I made myself use it exclusively so I would get used to it and am torn. Do I sell my Canon stuff and invest in more Fuji lenses or keep both? Has anyone done this and have any advice, comments. Both are fantastic cameras and there is a weight consideration but I am really unsure if I will regret selling my 6D. I’d do the same kind of photography with both systems. I was going to buy the new Canon 6D mark 2 before I got the Fuji but it has disappointing reviews and my son had got the Xt2 and was really pleased with it. Any advice out there?

I'm in the same boat, I could never bring myself to sell the Canon setup though. Every time I use it I love the results (I prefer the FF output over crop) so I keep hold of it. I do also like using the Fuji setup a lot, especially the EVF etc. I'm probably going to scale back my Fuji gear, just keep a small kit. Although with the release of the Sony A9 and what the A7mkIII might bring, I do wonder if just going all in with a single setup with Sony is an option.... Ho hum.
 
I'm delighted I got away from Full frame, I don't have any GAS or urges for any new high end models that come out anymore. I couldn't give a monkey's about the D850 or whatever lump of over-priced brick Sony churn out, I don't care if they can do 99fps, have 10000 focus points and can swim to shore and dry themselves off after being dropped in a lake! :D I leave all that to the gear heads with more money than sense. I'm only ever looking to used bargains, smaller, lighter but still very capable packages. I've been eyeing M43, as a side to the ol' Fuji. Even my desire for the X-T2 has waned, it's not going to improve my end results so I don't need it. I think a teensy M43 camera actually might though.
 
This is certainly a nice shot, but I think the mono has the edge. Mind you my other half would say the opposite. Horses for courses :)


Thank you kindly Sir, sure is appreciated.(y)

"I too prefer the mono version, but as you say horses for courses"

George.
 
I have a dilemma. I bought a Fuji Xt2 a couple of months ago and love it. I also have a much loved ,well used, 6D Canon with about 5 Lenses 3 of them L lenses so represents a big investment. Since buying the Fuji, I made myself use it exclusively so I would get used to it and am torn. Do I sell my Canon stuff and invest in more Fuji lenses or keep both? Has anyone done this and have any advice, comments. Both are fantastic cameras and there is a weight consideration but I am really unsure if I will regret selling my 6D. I’d do the same kind of photography with both systems. I was going to buy the new Canon 6D mark 2 before I got the Fuji but it has disappointing reviews and my son had got the Xt2 and was really pleased with it. Any advice out there?

Ive gone from Nikon D810 to a complete Fuji set up, is the Fuji has good in the ultimate IQ stakes no of course not but for the size I print I can't tell the difference in fact the biggest print I have up is a 45cm x 30cm form a infant red Fuji X-E1 an whole 12mp.
I did got a bit of gas recently and started thinking I cold pick up a cheap D810 but sorting through my landscapes (Fuji's weakest point if you believe some people) I found most of my favourite stuff are from a Fuji X-t1 or X-T2.

but saying that if running 2 systems suits you just do it personally the hassle of doing it for me wasn't worth it but everyone one mileage varies.
 
If anyone is wanting a 55-200 they have one instore at Peterborough John Lewis for £499
With a further 95 quid cashback you are getting a good deal for just over £400

Cheaper than a refurb with the usual JL two year warranty, already have one otherwise would have snapped it up
Also saw a brand new X-Pro1 for 350 quid, alas no other Fuji cameras, I wanted a look at the new X-E3
 
If anyone is wanting a 55-200 they have one instore at Peterborough John Lewis for £499
With a further 95 quid cashback you are getting a good deal for just over £400

Cheaper than a refurb with the usual JL two year warranty, already have one otherwise would have snapped it up
Also saw a brand new X-Pro1 for 350 quid, alas no other Fuji cameras, I wanted a look at the new X-E3

I think John Lewis have ditched Fuji, all 3 of my local stores don't stock the X-T series any longer.
 
I think John Lewis have ditched Fuji, all 3 of my local stores don't stock the X-T series any longer.

Good selection in their Cambridge shop, perhaps Fuji sells better in some places.
 
I'm delighted I got away from Full frame, I don't have any GAS or urges for any new high end models that come out anymore. I couldn't give a monkey's about the D850 or whatever lump of over-priced brick Sony churn out, I don't care if they can do 99fps, have 10000 focus points and can swim to shore and dry themselves off after being dropped in a lake! :D I leave all that to the gear heads with more money than sense. I'm only ever looking to used bargains, smaller, lighter but still very capable packages. I've been eyeing M43, as a side to the ol' Fuji. Even my desire for the X-T2 has waned, it's not going to improve my end results so I don't need it. I think a teensy M43 camera actually might though.

It's not just about gear though, my 1Ds2 with Sigma 50mm setup that I love, costs less than my X-T2 and 35mm setup, is cheaper than my X-T1 with the same lens, but not the X-E1! Of course it's also a massive brick of a setup compared to the Fuji's! The shutter sound is awesome though, like chambering a round with a 12 gauge :D

Gear aside, I just like FF more than crop when comparing lens equivalent setups. At the moment crop doesn't have the super fast AF lenses (sub f1.0) to make a good shout of it. In isolation I love the Fuji output, but alongside FF I just prefer a FF 35mm f1.4 over a crop 23mm f1.4. I still like the crop, which is why I still cling on to two setups!

I keep meaning to buy the mitakon 35mm f0.95 but they haven't got round to it. It's when considering this that I think more of a Sony FF mirrorless setup with small manual glass and larger AF glass as and when is needed. I Iike EVF and tiltable rear screens, and the tactile Fuji X-T1/2 bodies are great. I've literally tossed a coin to decide which setup to sell in the past, and only haven't gone through it as it's such a pain to sell (mpb never offer me anything close to second hand sale price, I don't know how others get that), Fuji has lost out on each coin toss my the way!

I don't shoot landscape at all, my main is candid family stuff as a happy snapper, but I like the wide open look (with moving subjects indoors a fast aperture is needed anyway).
 
Back
Top