Based on the current upload rate, it is estimating the progress at 484GB per day. At that rate mine will take 4 days to complete. Oh well should be done by the time I get home on Saturday as I am away with work for a few days
so strange that this thread has come up - I have a seagate hd and hadn't really used it however thought I should move my pics on to it and for some reason I saved my Christmas holiday pics directly on to a folder I created on it - then yesterday I couldn't access the drive when I right clicked the drive it wasn't giving me the option to browse files. So today took it to a shop to see if they can get do anything - as long as they can get the pictures from it I'll be happy. Certainly won't be getting a seagate again and will be keeping copies on my computer too - thought I'd free us some computer space by transferring them over.
Its now tracking at 664GB/day, however I do have the 200 mb/s fibre from Virgin
View attachment 117543
Its been running in the backround all day and i havent noticed it at all. I have been streaminf music and surfing and havent noticed any lag on my mac. Normally my upload speeds are in the 10-20 mbs range, it think its down to using multiple threadsI'm with Virgin too but only 100 mb/s service. Rarely see upload speeds into double figures. Normally 5-6 ish. Suspect my data is going to take weeks rather than days. 4tb ish.
But I guess it's not too disruptive and just cracks on in the background?
you can select dates to back up but not individual files hth mike.quick question regarding backblaze but can you access your data like you can with say onedrive or is it a backup only (ie, the software creates an image on the cloud and you just download the whole thing in the case of a data loss)?
I'm not that surprised. I've had two proper hard drive failures and both were Seagate. After that I swore I'd never buy another.so strange that this thread has come up - I have a seagate hd and hadn't really used it however thought I should move my pics on to it and for some reason I saved my Christmas holiday pics directly on to a folder I created on it - then yesterday I couldn't access the drive when I right clicked the drive it wasn't giving me the option to browse files. So today took it to a shop to see if they can get do anything - as long as they can get the pictures from it I'll be happy. Certainly won't be getting a seagate again and will be keeping copies on my computer too - thought I'd free us some computer space by transferring them over.
I'm not that surprised. I've had two proper hard drive failures and both were Seagate. After that I swore I'd never buy another.
These days I have Western Digital for hard drives and Sandisk for SSDs and memory cards.
I doubt there is much difference between the major brands. In my experience I have had no failures with Seagate HDDs but all my WD HDDs have failed. Whatever you buy you should backup your backup.
It is down to personal experience, you may just happen to get a good drive or a bad drive from any manufacturer just like lenses. But Seagate have in the past had some bad batches, perhaps more than the other brands.I doubt there is much difference between the major brands. In my experience I have had no failures with Seagate HDDs but all my WD HDDs have failed. Whatever you buy you should backup your backup.
well the computer shop can't retrieve the files from my Seagate so that's that. More annoyed with myself for downloading my Christmas holiday pics directly to the HD and not keeping on computer too like a usually do. Lesson learned.
@Furtim No think they did more than that (well I hope so anyway!) - they had it for a good few days. He said something about getting a 'beep' from it but that was all - they could have given me the details of someone in Glasgow but he starts at £300 and for the Christmas pictures I couldn't justify that.
@Furtim No think they did more than that (well I hope so anyway!) - they had it for a good few days. He said something about getting a 'beep' from it but that was all - they could have given me the details of someone in Glasgow but he starts at £300 and for the Christmas pictures I couldn't justify that.
Could be worthwhile getting in touch with someone who knows Linux (or even Unix) who has the ability to attach a drive. I mention this as I've had problems in the past with both HDD's and SSD's - attempting to attach a drive to a system running Windows operating system usually results in failure whereas using Linux when mounting (attaching) the drive - it doesn't bother with the preamble of scanning the drive and thus risking failure. I've managed to recover stacks of stuff by using Linux over the years by carefully pin pointing exactly where the files are and retrieving what I need. Not guaranteed 100% though.
Have you tried to recover the images from the cf/SD card?
I deleted them from card and reformatted it at the time
I deleted them from card and reformatted it at the time
Recovery software may still be able to get the images. Usually comes with the cards. It has worked for me.
Deleting images and reformating the card doesn't in fact delete anything!
Actually removing data (by over-writing every cell with zeros) takes a quite a long time in a PC. Deleting and reformating simply instructs the card controller that these cells are available to be over-written - but until they are over-written with new data, the old data remains and can usually be easily recovered with free generic software such as Recuva https://www.piriform.com/recuva
If you haven't used that particular card since, the images should still be there. Even if you have taken a few new shots on that card, most of the data will still be intact though some bits could be missing.
I have used the card again and again since but will have a look thanks!
Recovery software may still be able to get the images. Usually comes with the cards. It has worked for me.
Deleting images and reformating the card doesn't in fact delete anything!
Actually removing data (by over-writing every cell with zeros) takes a quite a long time in a PC. Deleting and reformating simply instructs the card controller that these cells are available to be over-written - but until they are over-written with new data, the old data remains and can usually be easily recovered with free generic software such as Recuva https://www.piriform.com/recuva
If you haven't used that particular card since, the images should still be there. Even if you have taken a few new shots on that card, most of the data will still be intact though some bits could be missing.
If you've filled it since, you might not get anything but if not, you might be pleasantly surprised.
thanks so much! Downloaded the software and got almost all the images! Thank you so much guys