Car buyers should have 'long, hard think' about diesel

Status
Not open for further replies.
As for anyone who is worried about the performance of EVs - have a play in one; you'll be surprised how nippy they are, especially when you don't need to worry about range. As I've said before, they don't suit everyone or even every journey but if they do suit, they make more sense than ICE cars (or even hybrids.)

That is true. A few years ago I had a traffic light drag in 2.0TDI passat DSG vs one of those little BMW things. Absolutely no chance against it up to 40mph. Tesla's are even more insane.

Just the only problem that the BMW cost something ridiculous for such a tiny car, and would not sustain that performance even past Birmingham from where I live. On a "race" to skye I would see one probably 4-5 days later.

As said above give me an EV in large estate or SUV guise at same or lower price and keep the ICE range. Then we are talking business.

Heck even better, give me one that can fly... at 250mph like the one RollsRoyce / Aston showcased at an airshow.
 
Her biggest mistake is to trust the range guess-o-meter.

As we are all well aware, the range is heavily dependent on how we drive. That 50 miles you've quoted would be much less if you are stuck in traffic jam. EV doesn't have such problem, you are either drawing power to move the car, or you are not drawing power by being stationary.

As I've said, there's different charging rates, different use-cases:

I personally don't have an issue any car charging at a 7kW "destination" charger. All plug-in cars should be treated equal here. If your battery EV can't plug-in, then just charge at rapid charger for 15min on the way back.

At rapid charger however, there is absolutely no place for PHEV, PHEV should never block a rapid charger. Rapid charger are typically 50kW, allowing most EV to recover 60% of its range (so eg. 10% to 70%) in 30min. Apart from a few exceptions*, unfortunately all other PHEV can plug-in via the Type 2 AC cable and only charge at 3.3kW, a tiny fraction of the charging speed on offer. These rapid chargers are like motorway petrol stations, more expensive than home charging but enables long distance travel.

(* exceptions: Outlander PHEV can charge at 25kW. i3 REX is actually a full EV with a range extending lawnmower engine, so it can rapid charge at full speed)

My family sized estate car turns off in traffic so not really any difference to an EV car.

Charging rates, that is an interesting subject as I understand it there a a few different connectors and vehicle manufacturers are adopting proprietary systems for charging as apposed to a universal one, which would make things simpler and cheaper for all.
Those rapid chargers cannot be used on 'most EV's' though. The Nissan Leaf is reportedly the highest selling EV in the UK, the latest 2018 model can only charge at a maximum rate of 6.6kw, on a fast charger it is capable of going from 20% to 80% in around 60 minutes according to Nissan
https://www.nissan.co.uk/vehicles/new-vehicles/leaf/range-charging.html

1. Are you saying you have a magic car that can do 43mpg when stationary? How would you feel on a 31c day sitting in stationary traffic for 10min with the engine off?
Did you read my charging speed difference post?

Yep, climate control, lights, entertainment system etc all work when the engine is turned off in traffic, I assume the EV is also using power from the battery to keep the climate control, lights, entertainment system etc running or is that done by magic when the EV is stationary?
 
For me to buy an electric vehicle firstly it would need a 500 mile range at A road and motorway speeds. 300 mile range means realistically at the moment 220-250 as the scarcity of recharging points means you’d have to stop when the opportunity arose to recharge and even then you’d have no guarantee that you’d be able to.

Secondly I don’t want to have to break my journey to recharge/refuel. I drive to Norfolk which is around 350 miles and I generally do it one go with maybe a ten minute stop. I choose when and where I stop, not dicatated to by the ability to buy fuel/electricity at the inflated prices to be found at motorway service stations.

Don’t think an EV will be sitting on my drive as our main transport for a while yet.
 
But as I mentioned earlier, for the same initial outlay you can buy a faster more powerful ice car.
As mentioned earlier, you save the money back from fuel costs.

The same as you sitting in your EV on that day I guess..
But with engine off, you will have to either endure the heat or the ICE will fire up within a minute when cabin temperature rises. While I sit in my air conditioned EV with less than 1kW of power consumption (to move the car, it would use at least 10kW, unless downhill)

Why do I see so many cars idle in recent hot days? It's all to run their aircon. The amount of pollution being unnecessarily created is staggering!

On hottest day last week, my wife sat in our EV to feed our newborn (he was being fussy due to the heat). No pollution as aircon was powered from home solar panels.

Let me just make sure I have understood that correctly, I fear I have misunderstood. You have are 10 miles from home, your EV says it has 12 miles remaining and that situation causes you no concern at all, you continue happily on your way with no concern there could be an accident/road closure requiring a 3 mile diversion. But, you begin to panic when the 'fossil fuel' car goes down to having around 150 miles in the tank and you change your route to pass a petrol station, really, that 150 miles is more than the EV will do on a full charge, it's a wonder you ever go out in the EV if that's the case.

...
So, I arrive home and need to go out again I would need to charge the EV beforehand, assuming I have access to off street parking.
So, you see, in the real world most employers do not provide charge points for their employees EV's and frankly why should they pay for their employees 'fuel' at the companies cost.
Remember the fuel panic back in 2012? I still remember the panic I felt a few years ago (in 2016 IIRC?) in North Somerset, with fuel warning light on and all of my family in the car, the petrol station had no diesel.

I don't drive past the cheapest petrol station everytime I go out. I like the freedom of choosing any route independent of having to go past a petrol station. My commute is 60 miles a day, If the range goes down to 120 miles, that means I'll need to fill up today or tomorrow, but if today North Circular is congested, it would mean tomorrow I'd have to queue to get to the cheap petrol station.

With my Leaf 24, on worst winter day (when range is reduced compared to summer) I usually arrive home with >10 miles left. No problems with diversion because I live in London suburbs, any diversion is very short and route options are plenty.

Your whole assumption of "must charge at 4-6pm" is due to EV's range. If you commute 100 miles a day, and buy a 150 miles all-weather real-world range EV (eg. Leaf 40), you will still have 50 miles to use. That's Bristol to Cardiff distance.

Thing is with mileage in an ICE car, you are seldom more than 10 miles from the nearest recharging point, where refuelling takes a couple of minutes, so you can happily run the tank practically dry before filling up. That's not the case of an EV, and in a worst-case scenario (we've all known someone who has run out of fuel) a simple gallon container is enough to get the car going again. What happens to an EV with a flat battery?

If you commute driving similar distances everyday, you will never run out of fuel. Refuelling distraction simply disappears. Arrive home and plug it in, unplug and leave, it will become part of driveway routine.

But a flat EV battery (eg if multiple rapid charger on your long trip is not working, it is still early days for public infrastructure unfortunately) do require flatbed. For each Nissan servicing I get AA recovery on the Leaf for free.
 
1 same as an EV in stationary traffic, engine off and no fuel being used, as EV, no AC etc, so yes my car will average 43 in town or more on a run, consistently up to about 80mph, I won't ever run out of fuel because of the abundance of petrol stations as opposed to the scarcity of charging points.
2 you would be unwise to purchase any new technology in its first throws of design, do you really want to be lumbered with a very out of date battery pack 3,4 or 5 years down the line, I don't.
3 Renault are being very decent in allowing you to not have to purchase upfront something that could well be old hat in 3 years, purchasing the battery upfront adds to the overall cost of the car and it's hardly fair to discuss ownership costs and ignore initial purchase price. However if you use deferred cost option i.e. final balloon payment you are in effect leasing the battery anyway.
4 how can you ignore the fact the car costs a great deal more than a similar ICE, it all comes down to monthly payments and running costs assuming you don't pay cash up front, but even if you did you would still have far less in your savingaps account after buying an EV.
5 Pollution really, so whereas current ICE cars will easily last 8/10 years as the technology won't have moved on too far, I would suggest most EV owners will want to trade up as the technology is rapidly improved upon, or so we are constantly being told by EV supporters e.g. battery range.
Battery creation is a dirty item and creates enormous pollution, but as it's not in the UK I suppose it's ok?
6 50-70 acceleration on a motorway? You will be on the inside lane between lorries if that is your performance criteria, personally I prefer not to be wedged between lorries or worried I won't have the performance to overtake someone doing 60/65 in the middle lane, fully aware that most people seem to drive at 75/80 in the outside lane, which may be illegal but is real world driving.

Sorry but most EV are no better than town runabouts at which they are brilliant but unfortunately a lot of us need cars that will do 150/200 miles in a single trip without having to recharge or worry we won't make it. Or worse still will have to crawl along at 55/60 on a motorway.
1. Again, have you considered different charging speeds as I've previously mentioned? home charging? It's like you have a petrol station at home, fuel is delivered to you without getting off the sofa ;)
2. By same logic the original 2012 X100 class camera will no longer take good pictures? In 10 years time, my 13 years old EV will be the same as before, perhaps slightly less range but even if it can only do 40 miles (down form 80), it is still more than enough for school runs.
3. The Renault battery lease doesn't make ANY sense once the car hit 5 years old. Mark my word, they'll offer battery buy-out option on their second hand stock in the next few years.
4. The savings account will re-inflate faster than with an ICE car. The running cost have to include all costs: depreciation, servicing and fuel, we are already past the breakeven point for running costs of EV vs ICE cars.
5. EV is the same as other cars, as first owner trades up, the cars enter second hand market. My '64 reg Nissan Leaf Tekna are still being advertised for around same £9000 on Autotrader, after 10 months of me owning my one from a main dealer. They are holding their value nicely due to people are catching on to the low running costs.
6. 50-70 seems to be the standard metric. I've been faster than your "real world driving" in my Leaf no problem. But indeed likes of 2018 Leaf 40 let alone older Leaf's are not efficient at that speed. The motor tech is not being marketed well enough. The motor tech used in Tesla and Hyundai are better suited to motorway driving compared to Leaf.
But the point I was making is gearing. Having gotten used to instant power, I have been caught out in my (more powerful on paper) diesel Skoda when trying to slip into a gap in the faster lane. The power just doesn't arrive until the DSG sorts itself out (you'd think cruising at highest gear, it should downshift instantly), by that time, I have pressed more throttle than intended and the car jump forward with considerable engine noise. In EV, I get the exact power I demand the moment I demand it, they feel faster than their power figures suggest.

I agree current second hand EV's are all town runabouts. The emerging EV's will meet all your demands, the Telsa's, the Hyundai Kona, Kia Niro. Look at one with at least 60kWh battery to enable 200+ all weather real world driving range. (but keep in mind some, like new Leaf, have inefficient motors)

For me to buy an electric vehicle firstly it would need a 500 mile range at A road and motorway speeds. 300 mile range means realistically at the moment 220-250 as the scarcity of recharging points means you’d have to stop when the opportunity arose to recharge and even then you’d have no guarantee that you’d be able to.

Secondly I don’t want to have to break my journey to recharge/refuel. I drive to Norfolk which is around 350 miles and I generally do it one go with maybe a ten minute stop. I choose when and where I stop, not dicatated to by the ability to buy fuel/electricity at the inflated prices to be found at motorway service stations.

Don’t think an EV will be sitting on my drive as our main transport for a while yet.
I agree, EV isn't for everyone at the moment.
Nissan is well aware of this, and they do offer 7 days of ICE car usage for free if you buy their Leaf.

But you've got to be reasonable with range demands. The larger your battery, the more dead weight you are carrying during day-to-day driving. For the occasional 400 miles, you don't need 400 miles of range. When more EV's come on the market, there will be more rapid chargers (hopefully). But I personally think only a Tesla can replace my diesel Skoda, Tesla gets EV, they actually build infrastructure to enable long distance worry-free travel. Waiting for energy company to build unreliable chargers is not good enough for drivers.


My family sized estate car turns off in traffic so not really any difference to an EV car.

Charging rates, that is an interesting subject as I understand it there a a few different connectors and vehicle manufacturers are adopting proprietary systems for charging as apposed to a universal one, which would make things simpler and cheaper for all.
Those rapid chargers cannot be used on 'most EV's' though. The Nissan Leaf is reportedly the highest selling EV in the UK, the latest 2018 model can only charge at a maximum rate of 6.6kw, on a fast charger it is capable of going from 20% to 80% in around 60 minutes according to Nissan
https://www.nissan.co.uk/vehicles/new-vehicles/leaf/range-charging.html

Yep, climate control, lights, entertainment system etc all work when the engine is turned off in traffic, I assume the EV is also using power from the battery to keep the climate control, lights, entertainment system etc running or is that done by magic when the EV is stationary?

The 2018 Leaf can charge at either 6.6kW via AC (for example at home). Or 50kW DC rapid charging. The 40kWh Leaf is more densely packed but it hasn't got temperature management. They will charge fast on their first charge, should get back up to 80% in 40min. when the battery is cool. But after 250 miles when doing second rapid charge, you'd be lucky to get 30kW speed. It is a very disappointing car, and very very bad image for EV as long distance cars. Hence I have been banging on about Hyundai Ioniq and Kona EV.

My experience in my 24kWh Leaf had been 60% recovered within 30min, the more time you spend to charge top half of the battery the slower it gets. Beyond 80% it's not worth the wait. I've no doubt at ideal temperature, Leaf 40 can also recover 60% in 30min. 2019 Leaf 60kWh will have temperature management.

It's all open standard, the manufacturers choose different connectors, but only 1 will remain going into 2020. Here's some history:
- Type 1 is old AC plug for up to 7kW single phase charging.
- Type 2 is current AC plug for 7kW single phase charging and Renault Zoe three phase 43kW, it is be the standard for home or destination charging.
- Chademo is Japanese standard found on Japanese branded cars. It allows 50kW DC rapid charging.
- CCS is a combination of Type 2 and two extra pins for DC rapid charging, currently 50kW but plan to increase to 150kw then 350kw
- Tesla Type 2 DC super charging (which is an implementation of the Type 2 open standard no one else is using), currently 120kW, going to 500kW on "Elon time" (but beyond 150kW, dedicated DC pins are needed by the open standard, so perhaps Tesla will do CCS?)
For rapid charging, only CCS will remain in Europe. Not a problem for old cars because home charging cables will never go obsolete.
 
Remember the fuel panic back in 2012? I still remember the panic I felt a few years ago (in 2016 IIRC?) in North Somerset, with fuel warning light on and all of my family in the car, the petrol station had no diesel.

I don't drive past the cheapest petrol station everytime I go out. I like the freedom of choosing any route independent of having to go past a petrol station. My commute is 60 miles a day, If the range goes down to 120 miles, that means I'll need to fill up today or tomorrow, but if today North Circular is congested, it would mean tomorrow I'd have to queue to get to the cheap petrol station.

With my Leaf 24, on worst winter day (when range is reduced compared to summer) I usually arrive home with >10 miles left. No problems with diversion because I live in London suburbs, any diversion is very short and route options are plenty.

Your whole assumption of "must charge at 4-6pm" is due to EV's range. If you commute 100 miles a day, and buy a 150 miles all-weather real-world range EV (eg. Leaf 40), you will still have 50 miles to use. That's Bristol to Cardiff distance.



If you commute driving similar distances everyday, you will never run out of fuel. Refuelling distraction simply disappears. Arrive home and plug it in, unplug and leave, it will become part of driveway routine.

But a flat EV battery (eg if multiple rapid charger on your long trip is not working, it is still early days for public infrastructure unfortunately) do require flatbed. For each Nissan servicing I get AA recovery on the Leaf for free.

Ah the panic of a fuel warning light, mine comes on when it reports 50 miles in the tank, it's a very pessimistic estimate, I can get at least 80 miles from that point. If I really 'panic' I can put the car into eco mode which cuts the power output and advises when to lift off the accelerator coming to junctions for maximum fuel saving, it even sorts out the climate control to be more efficient! Don't use eco mode very often, sometimes on longer journeys for work when I know I have too much time to kill before arriving at the destination.

Hold on, haven't you been saying how easy it is to stop off at a charge point to top up an EV when required, but your complaining that you'd have to make a detour to go to the cheapest petrol station or queue a little, sorry that does not add up.
By the way, the free recovery from Nissan is not specific to the Leaf, it's on all Nissan cars when you service them at Nissan. I had a Qashqai previously, Audi also do the same for all their cars.

Yes, I remember fuel shortages on some petrol stations, mainly caused be people constantly filling their cars to ensure they would not run out, I think I managed to fill mine when less than a quarter full and never had to use a petrol station other than BP (I have a fuel card through work), no real panic on my side to be honest, maybe I'm more laid back than most.

Your Leaf on a winters day would be on the back of a recovery vehicle everyday if it was mine. I do more than 70 miles per day when at work, so a reduced mileage of around 70-80 would render the car useless for the winter months.

It wasn't my assumption of the 4-6pm charge schedule, I was just pointing out that some people may have to charge at that time, I think someone (could have been you or someone else) asserted that 'no one charges at that time' and that assertion is simply incorrect. It may be correct for the person who said it but their experience does not match everyone else's.

Like I have mentioned a few times in this thread, EV's are fine for those who's lifestyle can accommodate the limitations but for the majority they are simply not suitable at the moment.

No doubt they will become more popular in the future. In my opinion that is quite a few years away, manufacturers need to agree standard charge systems so all chargers work with all cars, too much propriety solutions at this early stage.
 
As mentioned earlier, you save the money back from fuel costs.


But with engine off, you will have to either endure the heat or the ICE will fire up within a minute when cabin temperature rises.




Remember the fuel panic back in 2012? I still remember the panic I felt a few years ago (in 2016 IIRC?) in North Somerset, with fuel warning light on and all of my family in the car, the petrol station had no diesel.
As mentioned earlier, I am not concerned about fuel costs or how much fuel the car uses. Driving a car is all about experience otherwise you may just as well get the bus.
I seldom ever use my aircon. Tilt open the sunroof is enough to draw cold air through the car and if at a standstill, open the windows and roof and bask in the glorious sunshine.
I don't remember any fuel panics. I haven't had any trouble getting petrol or diesel in 38yrs of driving. You would have had at least 50miles of fuel when your fuel light came on, hardly a reason to start panicking.
 
4. The savings account will re-inflate faster than with an ICE car. The running cost have to include all costs: depreciation, servicing and fuel, we are already past the breakeven point for running costs of EV vs ICE cars.
5. EV is the same as other cars, as first owner trades up, the cars enter second hand market. My '64 reg Nissan Leaf Tekna are still being advertised for around same £9000 on Autotrader, after 10 months of me owning my one from a main dealer. They are holding their value nicely due to people are catching on to the low running costs.
Odd that the Zoe and the Leaf are respectively 1st and 2nd in the top 10 fastest depreciating cars on UK roads. Both losing around 80% of their original value over 3yrs. Most cars only lose 50-60% over the same period.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...FjABegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw2yS7KZAdRIhfmi0IjQyqb-
 
Hold on, haven't you been saying how easy it is to stop off at a charge point to top up an EV when required, but your complaining that you'd have to make a detour to go to the cheapest petrol station or queue a little, sorry that does not add up.

Your Leaf on a winters day would be on the back of a recovery vehicle everyday if it was mine. I do more than 70 miles per day when at work, so a reduced mileage of around 70-80 would render the car useless for the winter months.

Like I have mentioned a few times in this thread, EV's are fine for those who's lifestyle can accommodate the limitations but for the majority they are simply not suitable at the moment.

No doubt they will become more popular in the future. In my opinion that is quite a few years away, manufacturers need to agree standard charge systems so all chargers work with all cars, too much propriety solutions at this early stage.
I'm not saying you should buy a 24kWh Leaf, because clearly last-gen second hand EV like Leaf doesn't suit your needs. The newer ones is certainly worth considering, more range allowing more people to move to EV. eg you drive 70 miles a day, Kona 40kWh gives you 150 miles of range, no need to plug in between 4-6pm ;)

But from your last comment I can see you are not well informed on EV, especially charging. Home charging is the main source of power. Charging standards are already established: Type 2 for AC destination charging or CCS for occasional DC rapid charging to enable long distance driving.

Charging is not an issue in an EV for driveway owners because every morning they leave with a full charge. As long their daily range fits the EV's range, they never need to consider any stops. The Rapid charging stops are needed very rarely, for example we may want to go shopping after work (eg arrive home and go out again), then I'd do a pit-stop at South Mimms. But I haven't rapid charged since April, when my newborn arrived, meaning I haven't needed to consider the car's range or stop for fuel for the last 4 months, can't do the same for any fossil fuel car while covering 3000 miles.

Yes, I agree currently only a small number of people can take advantage of EV's, mainly driveway owners. Hopefully lamp post charging will be rolled out in the near future.

As mentioned earlier, I am not concerned about fuel costs or how much fuel the car uses. Driving a car is all about experience otherwise you may just as well get the bus.
The experience of driving EV is better though. Instant power, maximum torque from zero, no gears, lower centre of gravity and regenerative braking for one pedal driving :)

I used to despise likes of Prius and idea of EV's. But after getting used to automatics and now find changing gear a chore, the idea of no gearbox logic to meddle with my driver inputs was my main reason for trying out EV. Now I love other conveniences (such as home charging and pre-conditioning) gained from switching to EV.

I've driven Tesla Model 3 when one was transported to UK for his roadtrip around Europe. It was the best car I've ever driven. Turns sharply, very good grip, instant response to all my inputs. The car is not compatible with EU superchargers, but the guy still managed to go from UK to Portugal, Switzerland and Greece just by using overnight charging.

Odd that the Zoe and the Leaf are respectively 1st and 2nd in the top 10 fastest depreciating cars on UK roads. Both losing around 80% of their original value over 3yrs. Most cars only lose 50-60% over the same period.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...FjABegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw2yS7KZAdRIhfmi0IjQyqb-

So it's suggesting 3 year old Leaf would only cost £5000? Good luck trying to buy a 3 year old battery owned Leaf for £5000. You can find 3 year old battery rental Zoe for £5000, but their list price £18k, not £29k. People have successfully bought battery owned Zoe for £18k.

The article prices come from list price of Leaf and Zoe highest spec battery owned before the gov grant, compared against cheapest trim Leaf and Zoe with battery leasing. Typical daily mail reporting.

Let's let real numbers talk: https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-se...regatedTrim=Tekna&year-from=2014&year-to=2015
Nissan Leaf Tekna 2014-2015, same as my car. I bought it from main dealer October last year for £9100 if I add up everything in my PCP terms. Cheapest one there is £9000 with more mileage than mine. Rest are around £10k up to £14k.
 
Do what does having the ac on do to the battery range?

As said earlier, electricity may be cheaper for now. But wait until we ALL have to start subsidising infrastructure and Gov start wanting some revenue back from lost fuel sales.
 
I'm not saying you should buy a 24kWh Leaf, because clearly last-gen second hand EV like Leaf doesn't suit your needs. The newer ones is certainly worth considering, more range allowing more people to move to EV. eg you drive 70 miles a day, Kona 40kWh gives you 150 miles of range, no need to plug in between 4-6pm ;)

But from your last comment I can see you are not well informed on EV, especially charging. Home charging is the main source of power. Charging standards are already established: Type 2 for AC destination charging or CCS for occasional DC rapid charging to enable long distance driving.

Charging is not an issue in an EV for driveway owners because every morning they leave with a full charge. As long their daily range fits the EV's range, they never need to consider any stops. The Rapid charging stops are needed very rarely, for example we may want to go shopping after work (eg arrive home and go out again), then I'd do a pit-stop at South Mimms. But I haven't rapid charged since April, when my newborn arrived, meaning I haven't needed to consider the car's range or stop for fuel for the last 4 months, can't do the same for any fossil fuel car while covering 3000 miles.

Yes, I agree currently only a small number of people can take advantage of EV's, mainly driveway owners. Hopefully lamp post charging will be rolled out in the near future.


The experience of driving EV is better though. Instant power, maximum torque from zero, no gears, lower centre of gravity and regenerative braking for one pedal driving :)

I used to despise likes of Prius and idea of EV's. But after getting used to automatics and now find changing gear a chore, the idea of no gearbox logic to meddle with my driver inputs was my main reason for trying out EV. Now I love other conveniences (such as home charging and pre-conditioning) gained from switching to EV.

I've driven Tesla Model 3 when one was transported to UK for his roadtrip around Europe. It was the best car I've ever driven. Turns sharply, very good grip, instant response to all my inputs. The car is not compatible with EU superchargers, but the guy still managed to go from UK to Portugal, Switzerland and Greece just by using overnight charging.



So it's suggesting 3 year old Leaf would only cost £5000? Good luck trying to buy a 3 year old battery owned Leaf for £5000. You can find 3 year old battery rental Zoe for £5000, but their list price £18k, not £29k. People have successfully bought battery owned Zoe for £18k.

The article prices come from list price of Leaf and Zoe highest spec battery owned before the gov grant, compared against cheapest trim Leaf and Zoe with battery leasing. Typical daily mail reporting.

Let's let real numbers talk: https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-search?sort=price-asc&radius=1500&postcode=al21bx&onesearchad=Used&onesearchad=Nearly New&onesearchad=New&make=NISSAN&model=LEAF&aggregatedTrim=Tekna&year-from=2014&year-to=2015
Nissan Leaf Tekna 2014-2015, same as my car. I bought it from main dealer October last year for £9100 if I add up everything in my PCP terms. Cheapest one there is £9000 with more mileage than mine. Rest are around £10k up to £14k.
Your instant torque in your Leaf doesn't lead for even a second before you are in my rear view mirror, by the time you have hit 60mph I am past 90mph.
If you want grip and handling, try a Focus RS, you won't be waiting for the bend exit before you accelerate, I can assure you.

The prices you are quoting are what a dealer will sell the car for, considerably more than private or what the dealer has taken the car in for in the first place.
 
AC on doesn't hurt range too bad, it draws ~1kW on hottest days. With battery being happier in warmer weather, 90 miles is possible in my 24kWh Leaf.
Heater on hurts the range very bad, it draws 3kW plus the battery is not as good at holding energy when temperature is very low. 70 miles is just about possible in my 24kWh Leaf.

I honestly can't see how home charging will be taxed. People could just use domestic 3-pin if the dedicated EV charger is taxed.

If energy prices do go up, everyone is affected, not just EV drivers. If price suddenly double, then worst hit would be those who are already finding it hard each month and rely on electric to heat their homes.

I pay £2 a day to charge to do my 60 miles commute, that becomes £4 a day, still cheaper than fossil fuels. The 63 reg Skoda Octavia cost similar to 64 reg Nissan Leaf when I "bought"* both in 2017, so running Leaf as main car still works out cheaper with twice electricity prices. Only 3x current leccy prices will make the cars even in fuel costs, 55-60mpg on the Skoda.



*bought Skoda using savings, to be kept until long range EV ownership is viable. PCP'd the Leaf with no cash deposit.
 
One last point then I'm out of here as we are going round in circles.
You have to plan so much more if you have an EV, be it short or long journeys.
Short journeys - if you can get 2 or 3 days driving out of an EV on your commute you know you will have to charge up (at home) the night before the next days travel if you were down to say 20% charge, but, if something happens whereby you need the car early that night before it's charged back up for a medium length say 30 mile round trip, maybe to pick up a child that didnt want a lift home but now does you may well be stuffed, so as a sensible parent you would always keep the thing as near fully charged as you could i.e. charging every night. I am sure we can all think of more examples, elderly relative perhaps that may need your help etc. In real terms an ICE with low fuel will always be close enough for a quick fill and have its range restored to maximum in a few minutes.
Long journeys - you have to plan where to stop to be able to charge up, assuming a point is available and suitable, which may well mean always travelling on motorways instead of A/B roads, additionally stopping because you cant do the journey in one go e.g. a 250 mile trip, realistically you wouldnt just need one recharge, you'd need 2 else you'll be flat at arrival of destination, not good, assuming you did actually get to your destination and the distance-o-meter wasnt "wrong".

Finally, what's all this charge to 80% as well, does that mean the quoted range is based on 100% or 80% charge, so your 140 mile range (optomistic at best, much like test/manufacturer's quoted MPG figures) is now only ever going to be 80% of 140 i.e. 112 in ideal conditions with a new battery.

They just arent for me for serious driving, they are about as usefull as a ICE with a broken alternator. :)
 
AC on doesn't hurt range too bad, it draws ~1kW on hottest days. With battery being happier in warmer weather, 90 miles is possible in my 24kWh Leaf.
Heater on hurts the range very bad, it draws 3kW plus the battery is not as good at holding energy when temperature is very low. 70 miles is just about possible in my 24kWh Leaf.

I honestly can't see how home charging will be taxed. People could just use domestic 3-pin if the dedicated EV charger is taxed.

If energy prices do go up, everyone is affected, not just EV drivers. If price suddenly double, then worst hit would be those who are already finding it hard each month and rely on electric to heat their homes.

I pay £2 a day to charge to do my 60 miles commute, that becomes £4 a day, still cheaper than fossil fuels. The 63 reg Skoda Octavia cost similar to 64 reg Nissan Leaf when I "bought"* both in 2017, so running Leaf as main car still works out cheaper with twice electricity prices. Only 3x current leccy prices will make the cars even in fuel costs, 55-60mpg on the Skoda.



*bought Skoda using savings, to be kept until long range EV ownership is viable. PCP'd the Leaf with no cash deposit.
To be fair I still see 55mpg avg with ac in traffic.

Oh they'll apply some tax somehow don't you worry. Some form of increased ved most likely.

And electricity will go up, those power plants and associated infrastructure won't pay for itself. Neither will long term nuclear waste storage (not sure we've mentioned the impacts of nuclear yet).
 
Last edited:
I have been dipping in and out of this thread for a while, and I can see no advantage for the vast majority of drivers to change to electric (or even hybrid) vehicles. I know that I am not alone when I say that my two last car purchases (2012 Skoda Octavia 55 reg & 2017 Alfa GT 08 reg) have been £3K or less. There are plenty of other folks who spend far less than I do on a car, so how does electric car ownership stack up for them?
It doesn't, and will not for a very long time.
 
I did, post #990


I think it is only fair to say, that if a small plutonium reactor (possibly evolving to one which salvages hydrogen atoms from waste products) can be fitted to a car, plus maybe a flux capacitor, then we will see the first true non fossil fuel vehicles, combining fantastic range with a possibility for time travel - bring it on!
 
I'm not saying you should buy a 24kWh Leaf, because clearly last-gen second hand EV like Leaf doesn't suit your needs. The newer ones is certainly worth considering, more range allowing more people to move to EV. eg you drive 70 miles a day, Kona 40kWh gives you 150 miles of range, no need to plug in between 4-6pm ;)

But from your last comment I can see you are not well informed on EV, especially charging. Home charging is the main source of power. Charging standards are already established: Type 2 for AC destination charging or CCS for occasional DC rapid charging to enable long distance driving.

Charging is not an issue in an EV for driveway owners because every morning they leave with a full charge. As long their daily range fits the EV's range, they never need to consider any stops. The Rapid charging stops are needed very rarely, for example we may want to go shopping after work (eg arrive home and go out again), then I'd do a pit-stop at South Mimms. But I haven't rapid charged since April, when my newborn arrived, meaning I haven't needed to consider the car's range or stop for fuel for the last 4 months, can't do the same for any fossil fuel car while covering 3000 miles.

Yes, I agree currently only a small number of people can take advantage of EV's, mainly driveway owners. Hopefully lamp post charging will be rolled out in the near future.

Eg, I drive a minimum of 70 miles per day, often over 100 and sometimes over 200 in a working day. The Nissan Leaf is not suitable for my work, it's not big enough, I need a larger saloon or estate to satisfy my work car allowance conditions.

From my comment regarding charging you have concluded I'm not well informed, I'd agree to an extent that I'm no expert but I can read and see some obvious discrepancies that seem to get brushed under the carpet.
The manufacturers are developing their own charging solutions, by that I mean the in car method of charging the battery not just the connector . Different vehicles charge at different rates at the moment, The Nissan charge circuit is limited to 6.6kw according to Nissan themselves, Tesla's is a lot higher. Now I do not expect everyone to share their designs but a standard could/should be created whereby all manufacturers adhere to it therefore all charge points would be useful to all EV's and therefore cheaper to produce/maintain. Think along the lines of the USB 3 standard for instance, anyone can create a device compatible to USB 3 provided they adhere to the standard so all USB 3 devices work when connected to a USB 3 compatible port.

Home charging will not be the main source of power if EV's become the norm as less than half the households have access to off street parking and therefore cannot charge at home, that is one of the issues that will need to be resolved before EV's become the norm and lamp post charging is not the answer, there aren't that many lamp posts around to cover a whole street or apartment block.

People keep mentioning the speed aspect of EV's too, which is slightly misleading, yes, EV's are quick from 0-30ish mostly (Tesla excluded as that's a 65k+ car) but my diesel estate gets to 60 faster than the current Leaf and has a top speed 1 and half times more too. Not sure if the average EV will out perform my diesel in the 50-70 range either.

Haven't Tesla recently released their patents? that should help if other manufacturers take on their technology thus making some of the parts common to all vehicles, which would bring down the cost.

Like I said I'm not against EV's, my wife has had a change of job location and we may consider an EV when she changes her car in a few years if we could find one that fits her needs, looks is a big part of her needs though, it would need to look funky, do the required range and be as simple to use and maintain as getting in and turning a key.
 
As said earlier, electricity may be cheaper for now. But wait until we ALL have to start subsidising infrastructure and Gov start wanting some revenue back from lost fuel sales.
Oh they'll apply some tax somehow don't you worry. Some form of increased ved most likely.
And electricity will go up, those power plants and associated infrastructure won't pay for itself.
You've said this a few times. (So have others - please don't think I'm picking on you!) But I thought it might be interesting to run some numbers.

To keep the sums simple, let's say the average car does 10,000 miles per year at 45 mpg. That's probably not too far out. 45 mpg is 10 miles per litre, so 10,000 miles requires 1,000 litres of fuel. A litre of fuel contains about 10 kWh of energy, so over the year the car is using about 10,000 kWh of energy. (1 kWh per mile! That's a handy figure to remember.) However, the thermal efficiency of car engines (averaged over typical usage) is only around 20%. So an EV doing the same mileage would use about 2,000 kWh per year.

To put that into context, my household electricity usage is 2,500 kWh per year. So running an EV would increase that by 80%, which sounds like quite a lot. However, my house is very efficient and doesn't use electricity for heating. The average UK domestic use is about 4,000 kWh per year, so an extra 2,000 kWh for an EV would be an extra 50%. That still sounds like quite a lot. BUT - domestic electricity consumption represents only about 30% of total UK electricity consumption [1] - about 100 TWh annually out of a UK total of about 350 TWh. And we're not talking about everybody's usage going up by 50%, because not everyone will have an EV.

Let's envisage a future where there are around 5 million EVs on the roads, roughly 1 in 3 of all vehicles, which some projections suggest could happen by around 2030 if the infrastructure is there. (Yeah, I know, big "if".) Those 5 million EVs will use about 10 TWh of electricity, which is about 10% of current domestic consumption, or about 3% of total UK consumption.

Suddenly that does't seem like very much at all. Again, to provide some context, the new nuclear plant at Hinkley Point C will produce about 30 TWh per year, which is three times what we need to power those 5 million EVs. (In fact Hinkley Point C could produce (roughly) enough electricity to power 100% of the UK's cars, if they were all EVs.) Or for those who are anti-nuclear, last year the UK generated 50 TWh of wind power, but three years earlier it had only been 20 TWh. So whichever type of technology you prefer, an increase in generating capacity of 10 TWh per year by 2030 isn't a stretch at all. As a nation we'd hardly notice it.


[1] Digest of UK energy statistics - Electricity - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/729379/Ch5.pdf - much more than you would ever want to know about the UK electricity industry!
 
You've said this a few times. (So have others - please don't think I'm picking on you!) But I thought it might be interesting to run some numbers.

To keep the sums simple, let's say the average car does 10,000 miles per year at 45 mpg. That's probably not too far out. 45 mpg is 10 miles per litre, so 10,000 miles requires 1,000 litres of fuel. A litre of fuel contains about 10 kWh of energy, so over the year the car is using about 10,000 kWh of energy. (1 kWh per mile! That's a handy figure to remember.) However, the thermal efficiency of car engines (averaged over typical usage) is only around 20%. So an EV doing the same mileage would use about 2,000 kWh per year.

To put that into context, my household electricity usage is 2,500 kWh per year. So running an EV would increase that by 80%, which sounds like quite a lot. However, my house is very efficient and doesn't use electricity for heating. The average UK domestic use is about 4,000 kWh per year, so an extra 2,000 kWh for an EV would be an extra 50%. That still sounds like quite a lot. BUT - domestic electricity consumption represents only about 30% of total UK electricity consumption [1] - about 100 TWh annually out of a UK total of about 350 TWh. And we're not talking about everybody's usage going up by 50%, because not everyone will have an EV.

Let's envisage a future where there are around 5 million EVs on the roads, roughly 1 in 3 of all vehicles, which some projections suggest could happen by around 2030 if the infrastructure is there. (Yeah, I know, big "if".) Those 5 million EVs will use about 10 TWh of electricity, which is about 10% of current domestic consumption, or about 3% of total UK consumption.

Suddenly that does't seem like very much at all. Again, to provide some context, the new nuclear plant at Hinkley Point C will produce about 30 TWh per year, which is three times what we need to power those 5 million EVs. (In fact Hinkley Point C could produce (roughly) enough electricity to power 100% of the UK's cars, if they were all EVs.) Or for those who are anti-nuclear, last year the UK generated 50 TWh of wind power, but three years earlier it had only been 20 TWh. So whichever type of technology you prefer, an increase in generating capacity of 10 TWh per year by 2030 isn't a stretch at all. As a nation we'd hardly notice it.


[1] Digest of UK energy statistics - Electricity - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/729379/Ch5.pdf - much more than you would ever want to know about the UK electricity industry!
With just short of 31 million cars registered in the UK and proposals to ban new fossil fuelled cars by 2040, I would envisage a much higher number than 5 million by 2030.
 
With just short of 31 million cars registered in the UK and proposals to ban new fossil fuelled cars by 2040, I would envisage a much higher number than 5 million by 2030.
So?

Hinkley Point C is enough to power 16 million EVs. The wind generation capacity we've added in the last 3 years alone is enough to power 15 million EVs.
 
Last edited:
One last point then I'm out of here as we are going round in circles.
You have to plan so much more if you have an EV, be it short or long journeys.
Short journeys - if you can get 2 or 3 days driving out of an EV on your commute you know you will have to charge up (at home) the night before the next days travel if you were down to say 20% charge, but, if something happens whereby you need the car early that night before it's charged back up for a medium length say 30 mile round trip, maybe to pick up a child that didnt want a lift home but now does you may well be stuffed, so as a sensible parent you would always keep the thing as near fully charged as you could i.e. charging every night. I am sure we can all think of more examples, elderly relative perhaps that may need your help etc. In real terms an ICE with low fuel will always be close enough for a quick fill and have its range restored to maximum in a few minutes.
Long journeys - you have to plan where to stop to be able to charge up, assuming a point is available and suitable, which may well mean always travelling on motorways instead of A/B roads, additionally stopping because you cant do the journey in one go e.g. a 250 mile trip, realistically you wouldnt just need one recharge, you'd need 2 else you'll be flat at arrival of destination, not good, assuming you did actually get to your destination and the distance-o-meter wasnt "wrong".

Finally, what's all this charge to 80% as well, does that mean the quoted range is based on 100% or 80% charge, so your 140 mile range (optomistic at best, much like test/manufacturer's quoted MPG figures) is now only ever going to be 80% of 140 i.e. 112 in ideal conditions with a new battery.

They just arent for me for serious driving, they are about as usefull as a ICE with a broken alternator. :)
Short journeys - plug in every night, simple.
Long journeys - currently, planning is need, with a plan B in case the one is broken. It is why I have a diesel as second family car, not another EV. But you should not need to arrive with good charge, unlike ICE cars, you can charge whenever there's electricity overnight.

The remaining distance meter in all cars except Tesla work similarly to ICE cars. It estimate based on your previous driving habits. After looking at it over time, people will get a feel for it. It's like those people on here say "I get 500 miles per tank", they get to know their car. Tesla's method is to give you a nominal number, and then you'll drive 10 mile and see it decrease 8 miles on a good day or 12 miles in winter.

I have been dipping in and out of this thread for a while, and I can see no advantage for the vast majority of drivers to change to electric (or even hybrid) vehicles. I know that I am not alone when I say that my two last car purchases (2012 Skoda Octavia 55 reg & 2017 Alfa GT 08 reg) have been £3K or less. There are plenty of other folks who spend far less than I do on a car, so how does electric car ownership stack up for them?
It doesn't, and will not for a very long time.
My '54 Mercedes C coupe costed me £180 in fuel every month.
Traded it in for Leaf, £1000 trade-in value as deposit, zero cash deposit, £114 per month payment and ~£35 refuelling cost. I'm still quids in.

But it is true that EV has a barrier to entry in the form of initial purchase price, especially as a cheap car. But it is mainly due to lack of second hand supply, even now, you can't find a 2009 EV (proper car, not a G-wiz).

Eg, I drive a minimum of 70 miles per day, often over 100 and sometimes over 200 in a working day. The Nissan Leaf is not suitable for my work, it's not big enough, I need a larger saloon or estate to satisfy my work car allowance conditions.

From my comment regarding charging you have concluded I'm not well informed, I'd agree to an extent that I'm no expert but I can read and see some obvious discrepancies that seem to get brushed under the carpet.
The manufacturers are developing their own charging solutions, by that I mean the in car method of charging the battery not just the connector . Different vehicles charge at different rates at the moment, The Nissan charge circuit is limited to 6.6kw according to Nissan themselves, Tesla's is a lot higher. Now I do not expect everyone to share their designs but a standard could/should be created whereby all manufacturers adhere to it therefore all charge points would be useful to all EV's and therefore cheaper to produce/maintain. Think along the lines of the USB 3 standard for instance, anyone can create a device compatible to USB 3 provided they adhere to the standard so all USB 3 devices work when connected to a USB 3 compatible port.

Home charging will not be the main source of power if EV's become the norm as less than half the households have access to off street parking and therefore cannot charge at home, that is one of the issues that will need to be resolved before EV's become the norm and lamp post charging is not the answer, there aren't that many lamp posts around to cover a whole street or apartment block.

People keep mentioning the speed aspect of EV's too, which is slightly misleading, yes, EV's are quick from 0-30ish mostly (Tesla excluded as that's a 65k+ car) but my diesel estate gets to 60 faster than the current Leaf and has a top speed 1 and half times more too. Not sure if the average EV will out perform my diesel in the 50-70 range either.

Haven't Tesla recently released their patents? that should help if other manufacturers take on their technology thus making some of the parts common to all vehicles, which would bring down the cost.

Like I said I'm not against EV's, my wife has had a change of job location and we may consider an EV when she changes her car in a few years if we could find one that fits her needs, looks is a big part of her needs though, it would need to look funky, do the required range and be as simple to use and maintain as getting in and turning a key.
Apologies, I should have remembered you had already stated your needs previously in this thread.

Charging currently is exactly like USB. There are 2 types of DC rapid charging ports: Chademo and CCS. There are 2 types of AC charging ports: Type 1 and Type 2.

Each car carries a small AC-DC inverter, Nissan's is 6.6kW, Tesla is 11kW, most other cars is 7kW. All AC charging points have a Type 2 socket, you bring your own cable (so it doesn't matter if your car is Type 1 or 2), any cars can charge on any AC points.

DC rapid charging has the AC-DC inverter built-in to the charger. Then, it's a simple case of drive up to the charger and plug in one of the big connector. If it goes, it charges.

(except Zoe can only do AC, but at 22kW three phase, this is the only exception. Next Zoe use CCS)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_2_connector

My point regarding 50-70mph is due to gearing. When cruising at 50mph, you'd be at highest gear. The kickdown takes considerable time, even DSG's. By the time ICE is ready to go, most EV will have reached 70mph, Leaf will be beyond 60.

With just short of 31 million cars registered in the UK and proposals to ban new fossil fuelled cars by 2040, I would envisage a much higher number than 5 million by 2030.
There's always a bone to pick in that eggshell. ;) (a Chinese saying)
 
My point regarding 50-70mph is due to gearing. When cruising at 50mph, you'd be at highest gear. The kickdown takes considerable time, even DSG's. By the time ICE is ready to go, most EV will have reached 70mph, Leaf will be beyond 60.

Mine has an auto 8 speed sports box, if I have it in sports mode it'll be cruising at 50 in 6th and will be ready to go, do it often when coming out of roadworks on the motorway, in sports mode the gear change is quite aggressive and extremely quick, it goes from 40 up to 70 in a matter of a few seconds, there's a 40mph roadworks on my journey to my base site so I go through it twice a day at the moment :)
 
So?

Hinkley Point C is enough to power 16 million EVs. The wind generation capacity we've added in the last 3 years alone is enough to power 15 million EVs.
How come only last year they were threatening power cuts because they feared the NG was going to struggle if demand got much bigger than we already have?
 
You've said this a few times. (So have others - please don't think I'm picking on you!) But I thought it might be interesting to run some numbers.

To keep the sums simple, let's say the average car does 10,000 miles per year at 45 mpg. That's probably not too far out. 45 mpg is 10 miles per litre, so 10,000 miles requires 1,000 litres of fuel. A litre of fuel contains about 10 kWh of energy, so over the year the car is using about 10,000 kWh of energy. (1 kWh per mile! That's a handy figure to remember.) However, the thermal efficiency of car engines (averaged over typical usage) is only around 20%. So an EV doing the same mileage would use about 2,000 kWh per year.

To put that into context, my household electricity usage is 2,500 kWh per year. So running an EV would increase that by 80%, which sounds like quite a lot. However, my house is very efficient and doesn't use electricity for heating. The average UK domestic use is about 4,000 kWh per year, so an extra 2,000 kWh for an EV would be an extra 50%. That still sounds like quite a lot. BUT - domestic electricity consumption represents only about 30% of total UK electricity consumption [1] - about 100 TWh annually out of a UK total of about 350 TWh. And we're not talking about everybody's usage going up by 50%, because not everyone will have an EV.

Let's envisage a future where there are around 5 million EVs on the roads, roughly 1 in 3 of all vehicles, which some projections suggest could happen by around 2030 if the infrastructure is there. (Yeah, I know, big "if".) Those 5 million EVs will use about 10 TWh of electricity, which is about 10% of current domestic consumption, or about 3% of total UK consumption.

Suddenly that does't seem like very much at all. Again, to provide some context, the new nuclear plant at Hinkley Point C will produce about 30 TWh per year, which is three times what we need to power those 5 million EVs. (In fact Hinkley Point C could produce (roughly) enough electricity to power 100% of the UK's cars, if they were all EVs.) Or for those who are anti-nuclear, last year the UK generated 50 TWh of wind power, but three years earlier it had only been 20 TWh. So whichever type of technology you prefer, an increase in generating capacity of 10 TWh per year by 2030 isn't a stretch at all. As a nation we'd hardly notice it.


[1] Digest of UK energy statistics - Electricity - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/729379/Ch5.pdf - much more than you would ever want to know about the UK electricity industry!
Won't take it personally :)

National Grid has already said massive infrastructure investment is needed, not just the power generating but transmission and storage. I'm just saying that cost will be passed along sooner or later. And then you have the installation and maintenance of public charging points, will charging for charging (!) be enough or will local authorities pass costs on?

Unfortunately I don't have a crystal ball so I'm simply speculating.. I'd love to be more optimistic but these things always end up costing average Joe more money.
 
How come only last year they were threatening power cuts because they feared the NG was going to struggle if demand got much bigger than we already have?
I don't know, you tell me.

But I'll tell you what I think.

1. They might struggle *if* demand got *much* bigger than we already have. But as I've shown, even a massive take-up of EVs won't cause demand to get *much* bigger.

2. Timescales are important. If we need 5% more capacity tomorrow or next year, that might be a problem. 5% more by 2030 clearly won't be.

3. They (or you) might be conflating *more* demand with *different* demand. I don't know how the supply to rapid chargers is effected, but more of them might cause problems in a way that more demand like we already have wouldn't. I'll look into that when I get some time. "Slow" EC charging doesn't pose any obvious problems in terms of capacity.

4. They're rolling the wicket, preaching doom and gloom, so that when they say they can manage with "only" £ X billion, everyone will say yes without flinching. It's a standard tactic for organisations who spend other people's money.
 
[QUOTE="wuyanxu, post: 8230670, member: 53472"

My '54 Mercedes C coupe costed me £180 in fuel every month.
Traded it in for Leaf, £1000 trade-in value as deposit, zero cash deposit, £114 per month payment and ~£35 refuelling cost. I'm still quids in.

)[/QUOTE]


You traded in a 54 Mercedes for £1K - you are off your mind - clearly mad.
 
3. They (or you) might be conflating *more* demand with *different* demand. I don't know how the supply to rapid chargers is effected, but more of them might cause problems in a way that more demand like we already have wouldn't. I'll look into that when I get some time. "Slow" EC charging doesn't pose any obvious problems in terms of capacity.
On-site battery buffers at rapid charging hubs is the answer. Like this Tesla supercharger station at South Mimms, which was still online during power cut:
https://electrek.co/2017/10/30/tesla-supercharger-stays-online-in-power-outage-powerpack-system/

The grid's high voltage powerlines already run parallel to the motorway a lot of the times, so it would be easy to tap off that without putting demand on existing infrastructures:
https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/21/national-grid-planning-fast-charging-network-uk/

You traded in a 54 Mercedes for £1K - you are off your mind - clearly mad.
Market value of the car was £1600-1800 due to very high mileage it had done. Come next MOT early 2018, it needs new brakes, new tyres and major service.

I also utilised Nissan Switch Scheme, trade in pre-2010 car, you get £2000 deposit contribution on top of your trade-in value for second hand Leaf. If you calculate by market value of the traded-in car, the Leaf would have costed me £9800, still cheaper than exact same model's asking price on Autotrader right now.


Demand for used EV will only go up, as cities put restriction on older cars (and not so old diesels). People are waking up to the fact EV cost peanuts to run and range isn't an issue with home charging. I can drive from Barnet (North London) to Crydon/Windsor/Dartford/Luton/Stansted and back on one charge in my early small battery 24kWh EV.
 
3. They (or you) might be conflating *more* demand with *different* demand. I don't know how the supply to rapid chargers is effected, but more of them might cause problems in a way that more demand like we already have wouldn't. I'll look into that when I get some time. "Slow" EC charging doesn't pose any obvious problems in terms of capacity.
On-site battery buffers at rapid charging hubs is the answer. Like this Tesla supercharger station at South Mimms, which was still online during power cut:
https://electrek.co/2017/10/30/tesla-supercharger-stays-online-in-power-outage-powerpack-system/
It's an answer, but we don't know what the question was, so we don't know whether it's the answer. All we have is a vague and unattributed suggestion that National Grid thinks something might cause difficulties at some point in the future. It might be nothing to do with rapid charging hubs, which as you say seem to have a ready solution.
 
Interesting thread.

A friend of mine is set on getting a Tesla 3 as his next car within the next 12 months, personally I am in no hurry in getting to an EV, not because I won’t save money, not because of performance or even battery degradation but simply because the infrastructure isn’t there. I live in Herefordshire, the nearest Super Charge point is in Gloucester, and I think on the way to Heathrow there are 1 on route. I fly in and out of Heathrow a few times a year, with my petrol car I can get there and back in 1 tank of fuel with spare. In an EV this will be a problem because it is about 130miles in distance. Even the longest range EV will struggle to get there and back in 1 charge and the car don’t re-charge whilst I am parked in the airport car park meaning I will have to charge once on the way back home. At minimum I will be forced to stop at the Super Charge station for about 30mins. This isn’t a problem per-say because it would have to be planned but I would like that to be optional and would like there to be more charging station so not every man and his dog doing the same journey will be doing the same thing I am…with only 2 bays (I think) in that service station a 30min charge may turn into 1 hour if I am in a queue.

The obstacle for me isn’t speed (0-60 in 5sec for the base Tesla 3 is MORE than fast enough), but range and charging time.
 
As pointed out, the question on my people's minds is range and time needed to stop and charge. Short distance daily usage is no problem for EV, in fact it is EV's ideal use-case. Long distance EV travel is already solved in examples set by Tesla: supercharging hubs.

From my North London home, if I were to drive west to Bristol, there's the new 8 stall supercharger hub at Membury service station. Drive North there is Northampton M1 J15 6 stalls. If I forgot to charge the car before a big trip, there's South Mimms 12 stalls.
Compared to Ecotricity's "Electric Highway", they only installed 1 or 2 50kW rapid chargers at each motorway service area, it was probably fine in 2013 with few EV's and not many would drive it far. Now, there will probably be a queue to rapid charge. I had to queue half of the stops when I drove my Leaf 150 miles to North Somerset last year after buying it.

I know many people don't rate Tesla due to them being a newcomer. But for EV to actually drive long distances with family in the back, Tesla's supercharger network is worth Tesla's premium many times over. Unlike other EV's, Tesla is the only car you can get in and drive like a petrol/diesel thanks to its supercharger network. Back up to 80% in 40min, 50% within 20min, and no queues.



All the dooms day stuff on power cuts originate from calculates that many people will plug-in at the same time and false assumption that the car will start charging right away.

Home battery and smart connected EV is also part of renewable energy solution:
4-6 is highest demand? It is a result of renewable installs, mainly solar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_curve). Home battery will remove many houses from this demand while the rest will have to be persuaded to use those electric oven less by higher tariff during those hours. V2G enabled EV can also help reduce your bills when you get home, because you would never drive a car to utterly, completely empty. If you arrive home with 10 miles of range left, that's 3kWh for you to use, or 1 hour of oven on full blast (to heat to 200c, fan oven only needs 15min or so to get up to temperature), or 3.75 hours of microwave. 3kWh is a lot for an average household.....

Funny enough, my 2013 spec Nissan Leaf is compatible with Chademo V2G (the DC charge port). I can buy V2G system offered for new 2018 Leaf and gain this feature. Not going obsolete as people are suggesting.
 
My family sized estate car turns off in traffic so not really any difference to an EV car.

Charging rates, that is an interesting subject as I understand it there a a few different connectors and vehicle manufacturers are adopting proprietary systems for charging as apposed to a universal one, which would make things simpler and cheaper for all.
Those rapid chargers cannot be used on 'most EV's' though. The Nissan Leaf is reportedly the highest selling EV in the UK, the latest 2018 model can only charge at a maximum rate of 6.6kw, on a fast charger it is capable of going from 20% to 80% in around 60 minutes according to Nissan
https://www.nissan.co.uk/vehicles/new-vehicles/leaf/range-charging.html



Yep, climate control, lights, entertainment system etc all work when the engine is turned off in traffic, I assume the EV is also using power from the battery to keep the climate control, lights, entertainment system etc running or is that done by magic when the EV is stationary?
I believe that some EVs have two battery systems, one high voltage for motion & and a second at 12V for in-vehicle services such as radio, lights?
 
Last edited:
The repeated rapid charge issue is basically only the Leaf as as Nissan were cheap and didn't use a proper battery temperature management system. No other EV really has the issue at all. Also nissan kept quoting 235 NEDC miles as realistic and it isn't. It's more like 150 miles in good weather so it's a double cheat as a lot of people assumed they'd never need to charge more than once but the range lies meant they 'd need to charge several times on longer journeys. Winter range is crap and is less than the Ioniq which has a smaller battery. The leaf is a poor EV in many ways.
 
Just walked past about 8 charging points in a car park at the O2. All spaces are clearly marked and all spaces are full of EV cars. Only 2 of them were plugged in though.
 
Only 2 of them were plugged in though.
Selfish traits aren't limited to ICE drives, then! Thats (almost) as bad as parking in a disabled space, when you aren't.
 
There is one very big reason why I detest all these electric and hybrid cars and it's not performance because I love cars with high performance < I'm talking about acceleration and handling etc, not fuel economy performance here.

And the big reason is fundamental.... No sound, no noise, no exzhorst music! When on the move, silent cars are very dangerous to all those outside them too. Yuk!

Give me a petrol guzzling BMW X5 Msport V8 any day, every day!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top