C1 ..is it easier to use compared with LR 3
It is easier to use compared with LR… any version… but one
has to learn to work without gimmicks and presets… a good
chance to approach one's own creativity!
Because without bells and whistles but only the necessary
tools with for perfect RAW conversions… even difficult ones.
The flexibilities under the hood are such that it can better sup-
port the high dynamic range of my D810's better than LR can.
Students and pros have compared their renditions in LR with
my rendition of the same files in C1 with the conclusion that I
got at least the same quality (but most times better) using far
fewer
sliders and achieving faster results.
The drawback for most is the absence of the bells and whistles
like vibrance, and tons of presets, etc.
Using presets is like ordering a pizza. Sure, you will eat some-
thing but you haven't learned to cook yet… and never will that
way.
With C1, you're in a pro kitchen will all the necessary tools but
one will be useless there unless one get to learn cooking.
C1 is very powerful but can be subtle using — contrary to LR's
often blamed loga
rithmic brutality— more accurate linear models.
Just different. KQc prefers C1
Yes, I prefer it BECAUSE it is different.
Now don't get me wrong… C1 is not for everyone! Not for the
sandwich maker or the "cup'o soup" user but for the committed
image maker… the one with the fresh herbs and ingredients.
Good cooking!