1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Okay Guest, it's coming up to the festive season. If you'd like to take part in this year's Secret Santa gift exchange, click the link below and speak to our resident Jolly Red Guy.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. Dave70D

    Dave70D

    Messages:
    4,806
    Name:
    FujiDaveXX
    Edit My Images:
    No
  2. trevorbray

    trevorbray

    Messages:
    3,971
    Name:
    Trevor
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks. Appreciate it.
     
  3. dave.hallett

    dave.hallett

    Messages:
    733
    Name:
    Dave
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'm quite tempted to make a version of this one with "Greetings from Manorbier" in old-style curly type, just because it's so unpretty :) The 10-24 is quite good at detail, isn't it?

    [​IMG]
    Flotsam
    by David Hallett, on Flickr
     
    Throttle, Phiggys, Cagey75 and 9 others like this.
  4. Stephen L

    Stephen L

    Messages:
    2,052
    Name:
    Stephen
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It’s a great shot, and this lens is the main reason for keeping the X-T2 and not going completely X100F.
     
    dave.hallett likes this.
  5. trevorbray

    trevorbray

    Messages:
    3,971
    Name:
    Trevor
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Exactly the reason that when it came to it, I couldn’t let the X-T2 go..
     
  6. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    10,314
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No

    Liking this Fujigraph Sir, plenty of detail, great sky, and a good mono conversion.(y)

    George.
     
    Dave70D likes this.
  7. Thunderbird010

    Thunderbird010

    Messages:
    2,369
    Name:
    Andy
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Lovely image and great colours I was up there in August such a relaxing place.

    [​IMG]All Photos-69 by Andrew Duxbury, on Flickr
     
  8. Dave70D

    Dave70D

    Messages:
    4,806
    Name:
    FujiDaveXX
    Edit My Images:
    No

    Thank you George :)
     
  9. Dave70D

    Dave70D

    Messages:
    4,806
    Name:
    FujiDaveXX
    Edit My Images:
    No
    What a lovely shot this is, nice one Andrew.
     
    Thunderbird010 likes this.
  10. Pick

    Pick

    Messages:
    1,097
    Name:
    Allan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I like your image and the colours , will have to get back down there soon, lots of photo opportunities
     
    Thunderbird010 likes this.
  11. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    10,314
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No

    That's a very nice Fujigraph Sir, liking this image very much.

    George.
     
  12. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    10,314
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just a simple landscape Fujigraph taken at Folkestone Kent UK of The Inner Harbour and disused Rail Bridge.

    X-T1, 10-24mm Lens, 1/400th @ F8, ISO-200, Handheld.
    [​IMG]Waiting For The Tide (2) (M)-03059M by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

    :ty: for looking.,(y):fuji:

    George.
     
    Throttle, Phiggys, feek and 7 others like this.
  13. trevorbray

    trevorbray

    Messages:
    3,971
    Name:
    Trevor
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Lots to see, great processing too.
     
    G.K.Jnr. likes this.
  14. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    10,314
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No

    Thank you kindly Sir, sure is appreciated.(y)

    George.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2017 at 7:29 PM
  15. Mr Perceptive

    Mr Perceptive

    Messages:
    3,172
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  16. Stephen L

    Stephen L

    Messages:
    2,052
    Name:
    Stephen
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Wonderful mono image, full of interest.
     
  17. dave.hallett

    dave.hallett

    Messages:
    733
    Name:
    Dave
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Another strange offering from the unique location of Manorbier. This picture doesn't look nice at all in colour - it's just a mess. But somehow mono gives an air of mystery. Or so I like to think :)

    [​IMG]
    Shallows
    by David Hallett, on Flickr
     
    Stephen L, Phiggys and jamiewednesday like this.
  18. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    10,314
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No

    Thank you kindly Sir, sure is appreciated.(y)


    George.
     
  19. benhben

    benhben

    Messages:
    6
    Name:
    Ben
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    There are rumors a Fuji X-T2s is in the pipeline for early 2018. The main upgrade is to have IBIS according to Fuji Rumors.

    Im currently trying to decide which mirrorless to go for. Im torn between the Fuji X-T2, X-T2s if its released and the Sony A7RII or III (if I can justify the price!).

    To all fuji owners, does the lack of IBIS hamper handheld shooting, especially in low light. A number of their primes and the 16-55 F2.8 on have lens ois.

    Ben
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  20. Mr Perceptive

    Mr Perceptive

    Messages:
    3,172
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  21. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    4,292
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I can't work out why they would put energy into a body based OIS when the one they have now is more than adequate, and all other manufacturers moved away from it...
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  22. Mr Perceptive

    Mr Perceptive

    Messages:
    3,172
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    This goes round and round, Fuji Rumors is essentially a click bait site. Fuji have said the image circle and the lens mount on the X-series cameras restricts the ability to add IBIS. Obviously you could have an IBIS mode and sacrifice the resultant image size, ie remove 5% resolution from around the edges of the sensor.

    I don't feel the need for IBIS, its only really useful if nothing in the scene is going to move. I am happy when required in using a tripod, or further developing my high ISO processing skills!!
     
  23. benhben

    benhben

    Messages:
    6
    Name:
    Ben
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Many mirrorless cameras now have 5 axis in body image stabilisation e.g. Sony A7,A7R series, new Olympus M43 to work alongside lens OIS. Reading various articles Fuji were against IBIS but the performance of the Sony IBIS led to calls to have it in the new Fujis. Its still only a rumor though.

    https://www.fujirumors.com/fujifilm-x-t2s-ibis-camera-will-ship-first-half-2018-will-announced/
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  24. Terrywoodenpic

    Terrywoodenpic

    Messages:
    4,953
    Name:
    Terry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    IBS allows for lighter and smaller lenses. It also can provide that benefit when using the many lenses in their range that do not have stabilisation.
    It also permits the use of third party and legasy lenses. However I do wonder how they will get over the problem of their narrow body throat causing vignetting at the corners of the sensor.
     
    Mr Perceptive likes this.
  25. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    4,292
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    I'd still ask why, when they have an in lens solution that works very well (one of the best I've used). As David above mentioned above, it would also mean reducing the image circle. Fuji Rumours is full of just that - rumours!!
     
  26. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    4,292
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes, I understand that, but right now they have a series of lenses with OIS that works very well. It would mean they would need to produce new versions of all of those lenses....
     
  27. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    15,452
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Eventually maybe they will but the existing lenses will doubtless still work perfectly fine on IS bodies. Panasonic have the same thing with both IS lenses and bodies.
     
    Phiggys and Terrywoodenpic like this.
  28. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    4,292
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I see the attraction of smaller, lighter and hopefully cheaper lenses, but the body would be heavier, and larger, and even more expensive!
     
  29. Terrywoodenpic

    Terrywoodenpic

    Messages:
    4,953
    Name:
    Terry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Absolutely not. I am sure that they are likely to be able to use both systems at once, like some other manufacturers. Alternatively you could just switch one or the other off. There is no need at all to duplicate lenses. Most Future lenses may however be made without built in stabilisation.
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  30. Terrywoodenpic

    Terrywoodenpic

    Messages:
    4,953
    Name:
    Terry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    Unlikely to be much bigger or heavier, but certainly more expensive.... but not necessarily much more than new models always are.
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  31. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    15,452
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    If you look at Sony APS-C and FF and MFT IMO the IS bodies aren't all that much bigger or more expensive so I doubt that Fiji's have to be.
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  32. tijuana taxi

    tijuana taxi

    Messages:
    8,521
    Name:
    Rich
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I think IBIS will come to fruition if Fuji feel they need it to achieve parity with the competitors.

    Medium format was until recently just a rumour, sure most of us would have said that was nonsense
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  33. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    10,314
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just a simple candid street style Fujigraph taken at Canterbury Kent UK of people in the lovely little Sun Street.

    X-T2, 10-24mm Lens, 1/75th @ F8, ISO-200, Handheld.
    [​IMG]Sun Street-03637 by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

    :ty: for looking., (y):fuji:

    George.
     
  34. feek

    feek Herbert

    Messages:
    3,569
    Name:
    Rob
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Another cracking shot George. :)
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  35. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    10,314
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No

    Thank you kindly Sir, sure is appreciated.(y)

    George.
     
  36. jamiewednesday

    jamiewednesday

    Messages:
    933
    Edit My Images:
    No
  37. dave.hallett

    dave.hallett

    Messages:
    733
    Name:
    Dave
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  38. Greggster

    Greggster Edward Woodward

    Messages:
    1,747
    Name:
    Gregg
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I do like your b&w processing George
     
    G.K.Jnr. likes this.
  39. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    10,314
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No

    Thank you kindly Sir, your reply sure is appreciated.(y)

    George.
     
  40. scottduffy

    scottduffy

    Messages:
    3,307
    Name:
    Scott
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2017 at 11:30 PM

Share This Page