Ok...
Firstly hello all... I posted a similar post in the equipment main room last week and now I'm back to speak to you Fuji Oracles.. I'm in a dilemma. I currently shoot Canon (6d with a 50 1.4, 24-05L and 70-200 2.8) I have a range of studio lights and triggers plus a flash. Now. My main photography is pets, (Dogs and horses mainly) either in studio or outdoors. I also live street, and recently went out with a Sony nominated street photographer on a days street shoot and the bug has bitten. He shoots Fuji and his images are immense. His name is Wayne Crichlow should anyone wish to look him up.
It seems the Fuji is superior to the Canon in every respect (Especially size!)
My question is this: just how difficult is it to switch systems? And is it worth it? I'm looking at the XT1 or 2 plus equivalent lens reach to what I currently have. Would that be an expensive switch? I envisage realising around £1,300 for my Canon gear. Or are there adapters I can use so I keep my lenses? I'm a bit of a noob when it comes to mirrorless so any advice would be welcome.
Thanks in advance for your help,
Nick
Nick
I'm a long term Fuji X shooter (over 5 years now!), but a couple of years ago I wanted to know if I was missing out on something with regard to FF, so I bought a 6D, Tamron 24-70 and a couple of other lenses. I kept the 6D for about a year using it alongside Fuji X cameras, but more often than not I'd leave the house with a Fuji camera, leaving the 6D behind, size and weight played a big part in this.
For the type of photography I do, I am very happy with the X series cameras, the only thing that the Canon did better (again for my type of photography) was low light/High ISO, shooting at 6400, 12800 or even 25,600 could produce great images from the Canon, whereas my then X-T1 I felt struggled above ISO3200.
But the X-T2 came along, and although this looks like only an incremental step up from the X-T1, the reality is that its quite a bit better, not only is it snappier (AF and overall) with high resolution, but its quite a bit better than the X-T1 at high ISO, 6400 is now fine and I've had good shots at 12,800.
I think that if you went for the X-T1 you might feel that you've moved sideways a bit, whereas with the X-T2 I think you we feel that you've moved forward. I know its a bigger investment and with the range of glass you want/need it might be a tretch, but it will be worth it.
Another option would be to keep all the Canon gear and buy a s/h X100T or X100F for your street work. That way you know and understand all your studio and flash work, and have a discrete camera for street work.