1. Mr Perceptive

    Mr Perceptive

    Messages:
    3,952
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    @Harlequin565 and I have both Fuji extension tubes, so if you want to try with AF, let me know.
     
    Harlequin565 and Phiggys like this.
  2. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    5,064
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'm not sure about this one, not quite the look I was going for, but I left my Big Stopper at home :oops: :$ :rolleyes:

    Taken at Riverside Park, Gillingham yesterday. T2 with the 10-24.

    [​IMG]Beached by Steve Jelly, on Flickr

    There's another one further along the estuary, which is a bit further out. Really needed a 50-140 for this one :D

    [​IMG]Abandoned by Steve Jelly, on Flickr
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2018
  3. macvisual

    macvisual

    Messages:
    5,412
    Name:
    Peter
    Edit My Images:
    No
  4. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    12,179
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just a simple Fujigraph taken at London UK of me messing about with a snap of my shadow.
    I'm also working on a personal project called Faceless and this will be one of the shots included.

    X-T1, 10-24mm Lens, 1/140th @ F5.6, ISO-200 Handheld.
    [​IMG]Me And My Shadow (2)-03237 by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

    :ty: for looking., (y):fuji:

    George.
     
    feek, Phiggys and Peter123 like this.
  5. macvisual

    macvisual

    Messages:
    5,412
    Name:
    Peter
    Edit My Images:
    No
  6. Dave70D

    Dave70D

    Messages:
    7,275
    Name:
    Hi Ho Silver away !
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Today at the Brighton Music Hall, X-T2 + XF 18-55mm, Sam singing to all.


    [​IMG]Singer Sam Brown by Dave, on Flickr
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  7. dave.hallett

    dave.hallett

    Messages:
    1,147
    Name:
    Dave
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I like the top one. For me, the water adds interest as another texture. Don't think a long exposure would help the shot at all, unless you got so close as to lose the shoreline, which may of course be exactly what you intended! :)
     
  8. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    5,064
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks for the input Dave. My "theory" was that the moving water would look misty around the verticals. One of those things, if you don't try, you will never know...
     
    dave.hallett likes this.
  9. NickTB

    NickTB

    Messages:
    2,249
    Name:
    Nick
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  10. Phiggys

    Phiggys

    Messages:
    2,672
    Name:
    Phil aka Phiggys
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Fabulous shot
    Fabulous shot and one to put in the family album
     
    NickTB likes this.
  11. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    6,177
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Morning all. If anyone is looking to move a 56mm on please let me know.
     
  12. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    12,179
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Very nice candid Fujigraph Sir, and one to keep to show future girlfriends. :D:D(y)

    George.
     
    NickTB likes this.
  13. Rosedalelad

    Rosedalelad

    Messages:
    1,242
    Name:
    Andrew
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thorpeness Windmill:-

    [​IMG]Thorpeness Windmill by Andrew R, on FlickrT

    Thorpeness Mill was built as a corn mill at Aldringham in 1803. In 1922, it was dismantled and rebuilt at Thorpeness to supply water to the House in the Clouds, which is really a water tower disguised as a house.

    X-T1 & 18-55
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2018
  14. derekG

    derekG

    Messages:
    201
    Name:
    derek
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    12 Years with digital and i learned something new today, after transferring photos to computer from card, I put it back in camera switched on and got message write protected ,error reading file, thinking the card was shot ordered another from 7 day shop, whilst on the computer i googled write protected and found the cards have a switch on the side which ive never noticed before, reset it and all was fine, so spent twenty quid that i needn't have done feel kinda silly.
     
    scottduffy likes this.
  15. NickTB

    NickTB

    Messages:
    2,249
    Name:
    Nick
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thank you George. This one has been put away for future reference!
     
  16. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    12,179
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just a simple Macro/Close Up Fujigraph taken of a snail, using a 105mm Macro Lens and a modified Ring Flash.

    X-T2, 105mm Micro Nikkor (D) Lens, 1/250th @ F22, ISO-200, Modified Ring Flash, Handheld.
    [​IMG]Snail (3)-03224 by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

    :ty: for looking., (y):fuji:

    George.
     
  17. NickTB

    NickTB

    Messages:
    2,249
    Name:
    Nick
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks Phil, it's in!
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  18. Phiggys

    Phiggys

    Messages:
    2,672
    Name:
    Phil aka Phiggys
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Jelster, Fatboy Dim, Mezza and 4 others like this.
  19. dave.hallett

    dave.hallett

    Messages:
    1,147
    Name:
    Dave
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I like this! But if it were mine, I would also let Silver Efex Pro loose on it, to see what could be achieved...
     
    Phiggys likes this.
  20. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    5,064
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    So, with Mike purchasing my 80mm, I have ordered the 50-140 from the refurb store.

    Next is the 16-55, which will give me zoom coverage from 10mm to 560mm. Interview for a new job next week, if that's successful, one T2 will make way for an H1.
     
  21. Phiggys

    Phiggys

    Messages:
    2,672
    Name:
    Phil aka Phiggys
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Cool I'm now covered from 7.5mm fisheye up to 1200mm if that don't cover all my needs with 4 lenses and a converter I'm gonna give up and sell the lot:LOL:
    your gonna love the 50-140 2.8 I know i do mine :):fuji:
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2018
  22. Phiggys

    Phiggys

    Messages:
    2,672
    Name:
    Phil aka Phiggys
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Yes Im gonna try a Silver effects B&W conversion thanks for the prompt (y)
     
    dave.hallett likes this.
  23. Harlequin565

    Harlequin565

    Messages:
    3,014
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Doing a lot of portraits at the moment. Almost 90% decided to keep the 56 & the 55-200. Then there's this at 88mm...

    [​IMG]
    Better Half... Almost :)
    by Ian, on Flickr
     
  24. trevorbray

    trevorbray

    Messages:
    4,685
    Name:
    Trevor
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    You’re lucky to have a willing and beautiful model.
    Just a suggestion. Try posing her with the face more towards you, be sure the nose doesn’t break the cheek line.
    You’ll see more of her far eye and not draw so much attention to the nose.
    I think side on shots are more suited to male models.

    Caveat...what do I know...
     
  25. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    5,064
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    When I hired one for a workshop at BWC I knew I wanted one. In fact, when I bought the 80, I really wanted the 50-140 but there was no UK stock, so GAS cut in and I bought the Macro. Looking forward to it arriving, along with a replacement lens hood for my 10-24.
     
  26. Logicearl

    Logicearl

    Messages:
    203
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  27. Harlequin565

    Harlequin565

    Messages:
    3,014
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Thanks Trevor. I try a lot of different poses and have several with the face more towards. I just really like this one despite its faults.
     
    trevorbray likes this.
  28. trevorbray

    trevorbray

    Messages:
    4,685
    Name:
    Trevor
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Steve. I’ve got unashamed GAS for X-H1 (no funds though)
    Wondering what’s attracting you.
     
  29. architectfadi

    architectfadi

    Messages:
    3,408
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  30. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    5,064
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I just think the H1 will be a better fit for my wildlife work attached to the 100-400 & 1.4TC. As much as I love my Fuji gear, my compromise has been birds in flight; I just can't seem to tail them on the T2/100-400 combo. It may well be me, as I was never brilliant at it with my Canon gear but I did get regular keepers. Last month I was struggling to get Herons & Kites. They are both big birds that aren't particularly fast.

    Also, when I'm out & about, I tend to put the camera in the boot without putting back in a bag, just in case I need to grab it quickly. The T2 hasn't shown any signs of wear, but I'm sure the higher spec finish of the H1 will be better suited to my manhandling!
     
    Logicearl and trevorbray like this.
  31. trevorbray

    trevorbray

    Messages:
    4,685
    Name:
    Trevor
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Gotcha. Makes sense. Kinda figured it’d be related to your wildlife shooting.
     
  32. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    12,179
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just a simple candid street style Fujigraph taken at London UK of a youngster taking a snap with a cell phone. I just love the look of concentration on the child's face.

    X-T2, 55-200mm Lens, 1/1000th @ F6.4, ISO-200, Handheld.
    [​IMG]Togger (13)-03233 by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

    :ty: for looking., (y):fuji:

    George.
     
    Phiggys, dave.hallett and NickTB like this.
  33. AdamNZ

    AdamNZ

    Messages:
    398
    Name:
    Adam
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Winter in Auckland - XT2 with the 18-55

    AADW4194_web.jpg
     
    G.K.Jnr., Phiggys, Dave70D and 6 others like this.
  34. trevorbray

    trevorbray

    Messages:
    4,685
    Name:
    Trevor
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    AdamNZ likes this.
  35. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    5,064
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I have to say that I'm not impressed with Fuji's customer service.

    I have an order with them to the value of £1200 and they don't have the ability to track the order via my account on their website. In this day & age, when even the Post Office can give you those sort of details, it's pretty poor...
     
    trevorbray likes this.
  36. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    12,179
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No

    "Excellent" Fujigraph, well composed, great light, and a very effective virtual silhouette.(y)

    George.
     
    AdamNZ likes this.
  37. trevorbray

    trevorbray

    Messages:
    4,685
    Name:
    Trevor
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Not often that Fuji customer service is poor.
    Hope it turns up Steve.
     
  38. Jelster

    Jelster

    Messages:
    5,064
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    As expected, I went out for 30 minutes & missed the damn thing..... Have to wait until tomorrow now.
     
    dibbly dobbler likes this.
  39. dibbly dobbler

    dibbly dobbler

    Messages:
    1,572
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Ditto here - missed the 80mm but will pick it up tomorrow afternoon:)
     
  40. G.K.Jnr.

    G.K.Jnr.

    Messages:
    12,179
    Name:
    George.
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just a simple candid street style Fujigraph taken at Canterbury Kent UK of a guy with his Guitar doing a bit of street playing. I just love the expression on this guy's face.

    X-T2, 55-200mm Lens, 1/50th @ F5.6, ISO-200, Handheld.
    [​IMG]Muso (31)-03219 by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr

    :ty: for looking., (y):fuji:

    George.
     
    feek, Phiggys and dave.hallett like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice