Fuji X-T1/X-T2/X-T3/X-T10 Owners Thread
- Thread starter mart77
- Start date
- Messages
- 682
- Edit My Images
- No
Took this in Sitges whilst I was there over the weekend. I have a full story on him, we had a chat for a good ten minutes. Processed on my phone, I'll put up a better one in a few days
2018-12-02 17.27.31 by Nick Brennan, on Flickr
- Messages
- 5,218
- Name
- Trevor
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Just a simple candid street style Fujigraph taken at London UK of a guy with his Hurdy Gurdy doing a bit of street playing.
X-T2, 55-200mm Lens, 1/350th @ F5.6, ISO-200, Handheld.
The Hurdy Gurdy Man (M)-03232M by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr
for looking., 
George.
X-T2, 55-200mm Lens, 1/350th @ F5.6, ISO-200, Handheld.
for looking., George.
- Messages
- 1,023
- Name
- Pete
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Just a simple candid street style Fujigraph taken at London UK of a guy with his Hurdy Gurdy doing a bit of street playing.
X-T2, 55-200mm Lens, 1/350th @ F5.6, ISO-200, Handheld.
The Hurdy Gurdy Man (M)-03232M by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr
for looking.,
George.
X-T2, 55-200mm Lens, 1/350th @ F5.6, ISO-200, Handheld.
for looking., George.
Superb George, I bet Fujifilm hate you, you're living proof you don't need an XT-3 and 50-140 to get fantastic shots
Thank you fellow snapper, I sure do appreciated your reply.
“Ssh!!, Don’t tell anyone but I have actually got both of those items, the lens I very seldom use and the camera the jury’s still out on”
George.
Just a simple candid street style Fujigraph taken at London UK of a guy with his Hurdy Gurdy doing a bit of street playing.
X-T2, 55-200mm Lens, 1/350th @ F5.6, ISO-200, Handheld.
The Hurdy Gurdy Man (M)-03232M by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr
for looking.,
George.
X-T2, 55-200mm Lens, 1/350th @ F5.6, ISO-200, Handheld.
for looking., George.
- Messages
- 1,154
- Edit My Images
- Yes
A few from a recent trip to salisbury cathedral. Lived down the road for most of my life, but never been in. More in the album, but these are my favourites -
Salisbury Cathedral 3 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 6 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 9 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 2 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
- Messages
- 1,023
- Name
- Pete
- Edit My Images
- Yes
A few from a recent trip to salisbury cathedral. Lived down the road for most of my life, but never been in. More in the album, but these are my favourites -
Salisbury Cathedral 3 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 6 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 9 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 2 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
A few from a recent trip to salisbury cathedral. Lived down the road for most of my life, but never been in. More in the album, but these are my favourites -
Salisbury Cathedral 3 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 6 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 9 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Salisbury Cathedral 2 by jimmyjamjoejoe, on Flickr
Very nice set of Fujigraphs, liking all of these very much.
George.
There are a couple of things bugging me on my X-T3 which I havent figured out how to change. Can anyone help? Are these changable settings?
1. The live view dimms after 10-15 seconds without pressing any buttons. I am assuming this is a battery saving thing. But its annoying when shooting landscapes in live mode when the screen dimms whilst setting up a composition. Havent worked out how to set the screen to be on continuously.
2. The live view doesnt display a real representation of exposure. The final image is often more exposed than was shown on the live view. This is then shown on the image review in camera which is brighter than the live view showed. I cant work out what setting is used to ensure the live view accurately shows the exposure.
Thanks
Ben
1. The live view dimms after 10-15 seconds without pressing any buttons. I am assuming this is a battery saving thing. But its annoying when shooting landscapes in live mode when the screen dimms whilst setting up a composition. Havent worked out how to set the screen to be on continuously.
2. The live view doesnt display a real representation of exposure. The final image is often more exposed than was shown on the live view. This is then shown on the image review in camera which is brighter than the live view showed. I cant work out what setting is used to ensure the live view accurately shows the exposure.
Thanks
Ben
My little girl and mum in Lapland, just a quick snap with the XT-3 plus i40 flash, It was pitch black, and as you can see, it was snowing too.
Natiya reindeer copy by rick phillips, on Flickr
DSCF1445 by rick phillips, on Flickr
Last edited:
I've saved a fortune, what with Black Friday, coupons, etc. I've ignored them all and not spent a penny!
- Messages
- 1,251
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Bit of a mystery here: any ideas?
I've recently acquired a Viselex Rhinocam at a very bargain price and stuck a Pentax 645 75mm 2.8 on it, to see whether I like it or not.
If you don't know how the Rhinocam works, you can Google it, but the only thing you really need to know here is that there's no way the lens can be responsible for my problems. It's not talking to the camera, and its aperture is fixed with a ring.
What's troubling me is that I have my X-T10 completely in manual mode. Fixed exposure of 1 s, fixed ISO of 200, fixed WB even though I'm shooting RAW+JPG. I'm in S mode, so no bracketing. The shots are taken a second or two apart under constant illumination.
And yet, consecutive shots appear to have quite different exposures. I've composited two of them together in PS so you can see how different they are. These are RAWs SOOC and into PS via LR, but much the same is seen with JPGs.
Any ideas? Is my camera simply on the fritz?! Of course, the exposure difference can be adjusted for, but I'd love to know where it's arising.
I've recently acquired a Viselex Rhinocam at a very bargain price and stuck a Pentax 645 75mm 2.8 on it, to see whether I like it or not.
If you don't know how the Rhinocam works, you can Google it, but the only thing you really need to know here is that there's no way the lens can be responsible for my problems. It's not talking to the camera, and its aperture is fixed with a ring.
What's troubling me is that I have my X-T10 completely in manual mode. Fixed exposure of 1 s, fixed ISO of 200, fixed WB even though I'm shooting RAW+JPG. I'm in S mode, so no bracketing. The shots are taken a second or two apart under constant illumination.
And yet, consecutive shots appear to have quite different exposures. I've composited two of them together in PS so you can see how different they are. These are RAWs SOOC and into PS via LR, but much the same is seen with JPGs.
Any ideas? Is my camera simply on the fritz?! Of course, the exposure difference can be adjusted for, but I'd love to know where it's arising.