Hawk Conservancy Portraits

Messages
5,184
Name
Fi
Edit My Images
Yes
The stationary ones are much easier to photograph than the flapping ones - so here's some portraits from the Hawk Conservancy.
C&C welcome - all taken with my Nikon D7000 and 70-300 lens.

1. Crested Cara Cara
Mark_20180610_104806 by Daysleeper40, on Flickr

2. Delores - Cinereous Vulture
Mark_20180610_112109 by Daysleeper40, on Flickr

3. Hooded Vulture
Mark_20180610_142616 by Daysleeper40, on Flickr

4. Dr No - Secretary Bird
Mark_20180610_115830 by Daysleeper40, on Flickr

5. African Fishing Eagle
Mark_20180610_125948 by Daysleeper40, on Flickr

6. Kestral?
Mark_20180610_130036 by Daysleeper40, on Flickr

7. Brahminy Kite
Mark_20180610_132128 by Daysleeper40, on Flickr

8. Peregrine Falcon
Mark_20180610_152238 by Daysleeper40, on Flickr

Thanks for looking :)
 
Last edited:



Nice collection where my pick is the secretary for both
its beauty and rendition. Other renditions are not opti-
mised and / or equally well performed

May I suggest…


African%20Fishing%20Eagle.jpg
 
Thanks all - the edit looks really grainy to me Daniel
 
Lovely set Fi, 3&4 Particularly (y)
& Thats ( #6 ) a Merlin :)


Bad edit, it has more noise than a kindergarten class :(

30 second edit

Fi's-edit.jpg
 
Last edited:
Got to agree with hiss ,Daniel first off it’s a fish eagle not a secretary bird ,next the re.work looks like it was taken on ilford hp 800 film there’s that much grain in it . I don’t stick to the rule book with bird photography but hey dude if your gonna change someone’s work do it properly
 
Hissss… your own venom is affecting your reading capabilities. :dummy:
Oh I see what you meant now ,but putting that aside your rendering of the sea eagle is blown enough on the whites to render it unviewable and the noise has become so pronounced it’s what I would expect from someone that doesn’t have a clue ,if you must insist on doing birds and altering other folks pics at least get it right
 
Last edited:
Back
Top