1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  1. manda

    manda

    Messages:
    772
    Name:
    Amanda Herbert
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Hi all,

    Just wanted to share some recent portraits as I've not been active for a while. Happy for CC on my photography (but not the model).

    Thanks Mandy

    #1

    [​IMG]

    #2
    [​IMG]

    #3
    [​IMG]

    #4
    [​IMG]

    #5
    I've used a different skin processing approach here - I don't know if it looks too perfect?
    [​IMG]
     
    sunnyside_up and Swissy like this.
  2. manda

    manda

    Messages:
    772
    Name:
    Amanda Herbert
    Edit My Images:
    No
  3. Kodiak Qc

    Kodiak Qc

    Messages:
    16,919
    Name:
    French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
    Edit My Images:
    Yes



    Hi Amanda,

    The lighting, all around, is very pleasing but there are, IMO, issues
    when it comes to renditions.

    #1 insufficient DR and yellow overtones
    #2 insufficient DR and magenta overtones
    #3 adequate DR and no overtones. :)
    #4 like #3 but could use separation from BG
    #5 insufficient DR and skin work… she could be so perfect!
    #6 insufficient DR but cool tonal conversion.

    …hope that helps…. :cool:
     
    manda likes this.
  4. cargo

    cargo

    Messages:
    4,939
    Name:
    Gary
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Not competent enough to comment greatly. That said I can offer a lay persons feeling when viewing. They are great looking images. The ones where you say you did the skin smoothing different are the weakest for me i'm not saying that is because of the skin smoothing as that is something I don't do. I think it's because the skin colour is so different from the others. I get what Daniel is saying but I am pretty sure you processed them this way for effect/mood/feel.

    Gaz
     
    manda likes this.
  5. Michael Batten

    Michael Batten

    Messages:
    489
    Name:
    Michael
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Number 3 is gorgeous
     
    manda likes this.
  6. Swissy

    Swissy

    Messages:
    1,691
    Name:
    Giovanni
    Edit My Images:
    No
    3,4 and 6 for me :)
     
    manda likes this.
  7. Terrywoodenpic

    Terrywoodenpic

    Messages:
    5,028
    Name:
    Terry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    my only complaint would be the inconsistent skin colour, when presented as a set.
    seen Individually they are all excellent (I like the restricted tonal range)

    4 is the strongest image
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2018 at 2:58 PM
  8. stryvya

    stryvya

    Messages:
    897
    Name:
    Lennard
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Personal opinion, I think she looks better with her mouth shut!!!
     
  9. sk66

    sk66

    Messages:
    5,472
    Name:
    Steven
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    #4 is outstanding and #3 is very close.
    The first two have a bit of that washed out color cast thing that's kind of popular, and I imagine it was intentional. But the color cast doesn't work for me, particularly the greenish tint in the first.
    #5 is also very nice natural portraits.

    I would say the biggest thing you need to watch for is the fly-away stray hair, it's affecting most of the images adversely... there's one that's cutting across cheek, nose, mouth in #3 which is a real shame. I wouldn't say it needs eliminated for natural portraits, just tamed down. In 1&2 the pose & lighting is causing her to loose her chin somewhat (more-so 1). And I suspect they were taken from a closer perspective w/ a wider FL as she almost doesn't look like the same person to me.
     
  10. AHILL

    AHILL

    Messages:
    872
    Edit My Images:
    No
    What a lovely set. well done.
    I'll never purport to be a portrait photographer but I know what I like and number 6 stands out for me.
     
  11. holty

    holty

    Messages:
    3,913
    Edit My Images:
    No
  12. Kodiak Qc

    Kodiak Qc

    Messages:
    16,919
    Name:
    French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    Really, Lennard?
     
  13. wambam

    wambam

    Messages:
    533
    Name:
    Ray
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Really nice set...like the first two best ,
    Not to keen on what PP you have done on her arms in #1 they don't look a natural shape to me ,
    and also you can see where you have used the liquify tool on her arm on #6.
     
  14. manda

    manda

    Messages:
    772
    Name:
    Amanda Herbert
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Thanks everyone for their comments.

    @Kodiak Qc I always respect your opinion. Thanks

    Everyone's comments about the colour processing is spot on, I'd reinstalled Alien Skin and was having a play.
    I also appreciate your observations about skin colour - always the holy grail.

    @wambam @sk66 You spotted the details accurately too. The brown backdrop was taken with a 23mm and I've made my peace with the distortion. I'm working in a small room with no alternative. Only #6 has been liquified and I'm a bit gunho with it. As I'm playing with processing I didn't bother with the errors!!

    Cheers, Mandy
     
  15. ryanyboy

    ryanyboy

    Messages:
    5,312
    Name:
    Ryan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Quite an erratic set. I like three & four.

    I've said on many occasions that a wide angle lens is unflattering for head and should portraits. Number one demonstrates this perfectly.

    The pp in the last one isn't great imho.
     
  16. manda

    manda

    Messages:
    772
    Name:
    Amanda Herbert
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Why not - looking to improve? Thanks, Mandy
     
  17. ryanyboy

    ryanyboy

    Messages:
    5,312
    Name:
    Ryan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Distortion. Big forehead, eyes wider apart, large nose. None of these are particularly flattering. And in the case of your first picture you've shot from a slightly higher angle and/or she's leaning toward camera which has made her head look massive.

    But then you knew all that, as per your comment in post #14.
     
  18. Kodiak Qc

    Kodiak Qc

    Messages:
    16,919
    Name:
    French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    I hope you got that my observations had nothing to do
    with artistic intent which is, as it should be when expe-
    rimenting, all over the place.

    I really like your quest and devotion in it! Keep rocking :)
     
    manda likes this.
  19. manda

    manda

    Messages:
    772
    Name:
    Amanda Herbert
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Lol - sorry - I meant the post processing. I know wide angles distort faces. You've always been helpful , so thanks for sharing! Mandy
     
  20. ryanyboy

    ryanyboy

    Messages:
    5,312
    Name:
    Ryan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    No worries. In terms of PP I didn't mind any of them except the last one. For me the eyes are over done in particular. I think it's the the b&w conversion which emphasises it.
     
    manda likes this.
  21. stryvya

    stryvya

    Messages:
    897
    Name:
    Lennard
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    manda likes this.
  22. juggler

    juggler

    Messages:
    3,963
    Name:
    Simon
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I'd second most of the minor comments above - but they generally are minor. The pictures are lovely.
     
    manda and AHILL like this.
  23. gazmorton2000

    gazmorton2000

    Messages:
    3,859
    Name:
    Gareth (Not Gary!)
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Seriously? Come on now. So we should never use anything wider than 85mm according to that article? I particularly liked how he opened with...."Portraiture is more than you think it is", then basically moved on to say how it's basically just head and shoulders photography (for him anyway). Portrait photography is so much more than that article or what most people consider it to be. I don't mind the first one here at all, Mandy. In fact, I thought it were very striking. Presented alone I feel it would draw less comparison with regard to focal length than when presented with the rest of the set...the same goes for the processing.

    You definitely have a lovely style and I really like these, particularly the look in #3.



    Quoted this as it does feel somewhat contradictory when you add in your comments about artistic intent. Surely that's why we make photos like this? The word 'insufficient' suggests that it's wrong and we are shooting/viewing with lab coats on and we should adjust the PP according to the histogram. Hope you take my comments as intended. What I mean is, if we all shot to a formula...same focal length, same PP, same presentation, we would just be looking at the same image with different faces.
     
  24. Kodiak Qc

    Kodiak Qc

    Messages:
    16,919
    Name:
    French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Let me try to put it another way…
    Architects will design all kinds of structures that will have
    to pass the physical, mechanical, functional tests and be
    accepted, ultimately, as tasteful by the client. In this, there
    are the technical and the artistic aspects; one may not work
    against the other.

    Cooks have other considerations to work with but it all boils
    down to good taste… and it is the same in all crafts and arts.

    In these approaches, Amanda is obviously eager to experi-
    ment, being very bold at it and this I appreciate greatly. So-
    me treatments are valuable, IMO, for different reasons and
    some points —in these treatments— are not so well achie-
    ved making the final result insufficient in some regards as,
    in the same portrait, other decisions may be tasteful.
     

Share This Page