Well FWIW, and as usual making no comment about your processing, ref the above eight shots ...
#1 Given that you have an "upright" subject framed between two upright mirrors, it's not obvious to me why you shot it landscape.
#2 is cropped too loose for my taste, but next time you do this shot, which relies on the eye contact, try to make certain there's no reflection in the subject's glasses. And I do know that's not easy. If I'd had my way, nobody would be allowed to wear glasses to a wedding unless they had a decent anti-reflection coating on the lenses
#3 would have worked far better if you'd moved to your right and waited a few seconds until the bride looked your way (perhaps because you said something to her) then shot it from a slightly higher viewpoint. That way, you'd have avoided the pitfall of shooting a big girl with a big arm in profile (as well as that line of light bulbs in the background) and it looks to me like the light on them would have been better.
#4 nice for what it is but it'd be much better without the bottom of those distracting wall lights in the background
#5 nice
#6 nice try but you needed to be closer on a wider angle lens for best effect
#7 nice enough but wouldn't it have worked better shot portrait? Having said that, though, if you crop it square on them it would look grand in a frame.
#8 obviously I see what you were aiming for, but the bride's expression kills it for me. Either you just missed the moment or it hadn't happened yet.
Ref the accompanying blog post, there are some cracking good pictures in there, ranging right from the pack shots to the couple shots. I'm guessing you shot this gig on primes, which limited your ability to nail some of the shots you tried for during the ceremony, but why the aversion to portrait format - even when a picture's crying out for it?
Ref that second "signing" shot though, I freely admit to having a Big Thing about faked "signing" shots (so much so that after our second year, I refused flat out to shoot any) but even so - a picture of a hand which is not identifiable as the bride's holding a pen as if she's going to fill in the registration district name in the register? WTF? If the miserable sod of a registrar won't let you snap the real thing for some reason or other, at least shoot your picture so it's not so obvious?
Whatever, there's one area in which I reckon that for a modest amount of effort you could make a big improvement and that's avoiding background distractions, or failing which, removing them later if by so doing you'd usefully clean the picture up. To see what I mean, compare the two small pictures on your blog of the bride and maids sat on that sofa, one with and one without the intrusive sconces, and check out that bridesmaid's head in the recession shots, the dude in the black shirt in that one of the bride shaking hands with the female guest, the wossname on the wall behind the bridesmaid doing the speech, and so on.
But hey, ATEOTD you got a good coverage of their day and some naturals for a decent-sized print in a nice frame.
And you're getting better
HTH a bit.
