What profile are any of you guys using for processing RAW in Lightroom, sticking with the adobe profile or one of the camera profiles?
Still trying to get to grips with how to process the RAW files from the D750
I'd deffo have the 58mm if I had the cash.28/58 1.4's ftw!
Mainly camera standard, but I do occasionally use adobe standard as it can look nicer for certain things.What profile are any of you guys using for processing RAW in Lightroom, sticking with the adobe profile or one of the camera profiles?
Still trying to get to grips with how to process the RAW files from the D750
Eewwwi use vivid
One of my friends at the local camera club had a nice little feature on his d7000.
On the playback of the image it had the overlay of the focus area and a red square where the focus was at the time the picture was taken. I asked him how he did it but he wasn't sure and said it's always been there?
Anyone know how to enable this?
Camera isn't in front of me, but I think it's under playback options. You can tick it to show extra information and then use the up/down on the d-pad to scroll through information when viewing an image.
How're you getting on with the D750 Mark, are you preferring it to the m4/3?thank you, found it -> playback options > focus points
I like it.How're you getting on with the D750 Mark, are you preferring it to the m4/3?
50mm f1.8g arrived today, Sigma 85mm f1.4 EX DG coming tomorrow, just need a wider prime now and I'm all set,......... until the next bout of GAS
Go for the new 28mm then you can get your "white coat" on...50mm f1.8g arrived today, Sigma 85mm f1.4 EX DG coming tomorrow, just need a wider prime now and I'm all set,......... until the next bout of GAS
50mm f1.8g arrived today, Sigma 85mm f1.4 EX DG coming tomorrow, just need a wider prime now and I'm all set,......... until the next bout of GAS
Way too expensiveGo for the new 28mm then you can get your "white coat" on...
If only money grew on trees ehYou know you want a 58mm...
But it does, unless you use the new plastic 5ivers lolIf only money grew on trees eh
Way too expensive
If only money grew on trees eh
Not really sure about this one, missing the eye contact. But making a conscious choice to shoot more 'headshots' and landscape orientation with the 85mm.
Amelia summer II by Tim G, on Flickr
I personally don't feel every shot must have eye contact... I made a conscious decision to step away from head shots and longer focal lengths... It's nice to have a few of them but I think it's nicer to have shots where people/kids are doing something.
When someone looks back at the image they may think to themselves oh that looked fun, i remember that day rather than oh another photo of my head with no context. I try force myself to remember this every time I pick up my camera and vary things as much as possible.
I guess if you don't have many head shots you use the opposite strategy.
I do wonder how I'll view the images of my daughter several years from now. Taking a fair few, you miss the connection most of the time and like most of your own photography, you don't seem to appreciate much. Or am I the minority?
I do wonder how I'll view the images of my daughter several years from now. Taking a fair few, you miss the connection most of the time and like most of your own photography, you don't seem to appreciate much. Or am I the minority?
And the next thing I'm going to do is leave the 85mm at home and take the 35 or 50 and (maybe ...) try not to shoot wide open. All my portraits are 85 @ 1.8.
You are banned from entering this from the AVF photo comp.Another Macro of a teeny spider in my garden. The body was no more than 10mm, I guess the head was less than 1mm No idea what type of spider it is?
DSC_4145-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
No idea what type of spider it is
Haha, thanks very much. I still can't decide whether to clone out the leaf on the right. I've still not taken 'the' shot yet though, but got another week or soYou are banned from entering this from the AVF photo comp.
Fantastic image.
Make me realise what the 105mm is capable of as a macro lens (i know you used a different lens to the 28-105mm i have). I always though i needed a 200mm+ for this type of shots - absolutely not. Thanks for sharing.
I didn't even dare google that to see if it's right I think I've found it though, I think it's a spotted wolf spiderIt's a hairybity
I don't mind the leaf. Although it is a bit of a distraction it does cover part of the leg.Haha, thanks very much. I still can't decide whether to clone out the leaf on the right. I've still not taken 'the' shot yet though, but got another week or so
I didn't even dare google that to see if it's right I think I've found it though, I think it's a spotted wolf spider