Detail in that is spot on.
P2200948-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
No NR applied. Light was pretty poor tbh so am happy that I salvaged some. I was shooting some at 6400 ISO with the shutter of 1/200
You'll just have to get yourself the EM1X, you know you want to
No NR applied. Light was pretty poor tbh so am happy that I salvaged some. I was shooting some at 6400 ISO with the shutter of 1/200
P2201914-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
Aye, we've been discussing it
ooh that looks interesting!
I also have a foot in both camps and am watching the Canon mirrorless developments with interest.Wow... When I heard about this, I had a triple dilemma... EM1X or 300mm or that. I expect it will be beyond budget. I wonder how much it will weigh - that's a deal breaker and I can't imagine it wouldn't need a tri/mono-pod- [very slow recovering shoulder]. Interesting though, what's happening, isn't it? My other system is Canon and I am hoping for the next FF after the RP emerges to be a flagship that overtakes the 1DX2. All good.
I use Expert Shield protectors on all my cameras now. Once applied they stay there and the touch screen still works. They make them to custom fit the model and I've applied them to the Em5ii, Em1ii and Pen F in the past. The instructions are hilarious too
I use Expert Shield protectors on all my cameras now. Once applied they stay there and the touch screen still works. They make them to custom fit the model and I've applied them to the Em5ii, Em1ii and Pen F in the past. The instructions are hilarious too
Put it this way I point blank refused to use C-AF with the EM5-II but am happy with the results on the EM1-II
Thanks. Not sure what you mean with the question? Obviously DOF is greater than the 300mm f4 that I tried out and so it’s more difficult to get a clean background. I did blur the background out a touch more in post.
yeah, thats what im concerned about too .
Me too, but it doesn't worry me none.
Bit of global NR, then brush in a lot of NR to the background then applied sharpening to the bird in PS.
I've just closely inspected and can't detect them sticking out at all. In fact you'd be hard pushed to spot there was a protector on them at all.
Who says you can't get detail at high ISO on m4/3? OK, took quite a bit of PP but with a bit of care I was able to get this. Clearly not the best bird photos you'll ever see, but thought they were OK for 6400 ISO (best viewed on flickr)
P2201118-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
P2201220-Edit-2 by TDG-77, on Flickr
P2201277-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
This is a crop on a straight out of camera jpeg, in the lovely morning light.
The first one is impressive, great shot with loads of feather detail. The other two look good two but if I zoom right in I can see an edge around the birds, still plenty of feather detail again.Who says you can't get detail at high ISO on m4/3? OK, took quite a bit of PP but with a bit of care I was able to get this. Clearly not the best bird photos you'll ever see, but thought they were OK for 6400 ISO (best viewed on flickr)
P2201118-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
P2201220-Edit-2 by TDG-77, on Flickr
P2201277-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
Thanks, yeah I saw that but I'm not sure what's caused it as it's there before PP
Nice! I was surprised that when I did a 2:1 crop, mine still looked of reasonable quality - image wise that is, not composition! It certainly is an impressive lens.This is a massive (more than 100% crop) from the EM1 MK II using the 300mm F4. In fact the resultant crop is just 1658x1105 (so just 1.83mp !)
Not too bad considering the crop- not brilliant but I've had worse
I've joined with an EM10 Mark one!
It is a great lens. I always find it difficult finding subjects when you’re looking through a long tele lens, the 100-400mm’s even more difficult. I might think about getting the red dot sight too
It is a great lens. I always find it difficult finding subjects when you’re looking through a long tele lens, the 100-400mm’s even more difficult. I might think about getting the red dot sight too
Moorhen.