- Messages
- 8,301
- Name
- Ian
- Edit My Images
- No
Other than proving I can't manual focus handheld, this was quite an interesting experiment. Rated at 100, the Ektachrome is quite a slow film (for where I live!!) and so I decided to use it for portraits where I could control the light.
Problem is that I think my 135 f2.8 is a bit hazy. Or I can't focus for toffee without a tripod and lots of telling the subject to "be still damn you!" (1/60 sync on the AE-1)
The scan is neutral and I've done nothing with the colour. Tones have been balanced in LR, but colour is as per the slide. And it's got quite a heavy colour caste. That background is grey in real life and whilst my wife looks very "tanned", it's not as significant as the hues I get with Velvia 50. I'm looking forward to seeing this in 120 if it ever comes to pass...
Canon AE-1 w/ 135mm f2.8 at around f8 & 1/60sec, Kodak Ektachrome.
Ektachrome Portrait I by Ian, on Flickr
Ektachrome Portrait II by Ian, on Flickr
Ektachrome Portrait III by Ian, on Flickr
Problem is that I think my 135 f2.8 is a bit hazy. Or I can't focus for toffee without a tripod and lots of telling the subject to "be still damn you!" (1/60 sync on the AE-1)
The scan is neutral and I've done nothing with the colour. Tones have been balanced in LR, but colour is as per the slide. And it's got quite a heavy colour caste. That background is grey in real life and whilst my wife looks very "tanned", it's not as significant as the hues I get with Velvia 50. I'm looking forward to seeing this in 120 if it ever comes to pass...
Canon AE-1 w/ 135mm f2.8 at around f8 & 1/60sec, Kodak Ektachrome.
Ektachrome Portrait I by Ian, on Flickr
Ektachrome Portrait II by Ian, on Flickr
Ektachrome Portrait III by Ian, on Flickr
Last edited: