1. stevelmx5

    stevelmx5

    Messages:
    9,086
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    No
    SD > Lighting adaptor

    https://www.apple.com/uk/shop/product/MJYT2ZM/A/lightning-to-sd-card-camera-reader
     
  2. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
  3. stevelmx5

    stevelmx5

    Messages:
    9,086
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    No
    No, you can only copy images directly from it to the iPad. You can't stream from a directly connected storage media. Alternatively, if you want to stream video, you can use a wifi drive.

    Same site (Apple)

    https://www.apple.com/uk/shop/product/MD826ZM/A/lightning-digital-av-adapter
     
  4. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Cool ok I do have a wd WiFi hdd I can use for that.also the review for the HDMI adapter is not great so maybe there are 3rd party ones I could use.
     
  5. ChrisHeathcote

    ChrisHeathcote

    Messages:
    3,626
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  6. footman

    footman

    Messages:
    3,404
    Name:
    Laurence
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    That's a really weird coincidence , I've just spent the last 2 hours comparing different systems and I've decided on the Ipad Pro 12.9 inch. I'm going to go to the nearest Apple store to try out the Lightroom Mobile capability although I've probably seen enough on Youtube to convince me. I shall then probably get one from Apple Refurb.
     
  7. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I've just spent a happy half an hour testing my Nikon pre ai 50mm f2 :D

    The scene. I might try a brick wall but wanted something with a bit of depth because real pictures normally have a bit :D

    DSC00563.jpg

    It's ok across the screen at f2 but with some vignetting and softness at the very edges and in the very corners which are also way out of the dof. Things improve at f2.8 and it's sharp across the frame at f4. The sweet spot seems to be f11. One day when I have time I'd like to compare all of my decades old lenses with the same subject and lighting conditions but that wont be today. They're all useable though and that's what matters.

    Whole picture and then a 100% centre crop at f5.6.

    DSC00538.jpg

    DSC00538-C.jpg

    I really like these old Nikon's. They're very well made, they feel lovely and they're useable wide open and even if the bokeh is a little wild with the wrong subject it soon settles when stopping down.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2018
  8. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I may do that tomorrow and pop down the apple store and get the 512gb 10inch one
     
  9. F/1.4

    F/1.4

    Messages:
    1,846
    Name:
    Anthony
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just bought the meike grip from Amazon. Anyone here use it ?
     
  10. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I'm just watching Trump and Kim on the TV news and the machine gunning DSLR's caught my attention... It's time these guys went mirrorless if only so they can shoot silently at moments like this. Maybe in a few years time not hearing the machine gunning of DSLR's in news reports will be the norm, and it'll be for the better IMO.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2018
    GyRob likes this.
  11. stevelmx5

    stevelmx5

    Messages:
    9,086
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Seems a bit extreme for a 50/2 to have a sweet spot of F11? I wouldn't expect it to be at its' best wide open but maybe F2.8-4 but obviously you won't get sharpness across the frame at that aperture (as you wouldn't with any lens).
     
  12. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Dunno what you mean Steve.

    By sweet spot I meant sharpness across the frame which is often a couple of stops down from wide open with modern lenses. With these mass market older lenses it's common for them to be at their sharpest across the frame when stopped down a little more than a more modern lens, maybe, probably etc...

    I'd expect a lens like this to be at it's best for across the frame performance at anything between f5.6 to f11 with maybe f2.8-4 being more modern lens territory? Maybe? But I don't know what you mean by having a sweet spot at f2.8-4 and not being sharp across the frame. Something like the Sony 55mm f1.8 is sharp across the frame very quickly but I can't remember at what aperture. These older lenses are nowhere near that level and I'm sure I have some that perform very well indeed across the frame at f5.6-8, relatively very well that is until you compare them to something like the 55mm f1.8.

    I'd agree that f11 is maybe a little far and f5.6 to 8 might have been better but it is what it is and I'm pretty sure it's not the only old lens like this.

    I've just Googled for review of this lens but I haven't spotted any that help much, one said it's at it's best f5.6-11. I'd say that mine is good across the frame at f5.6, better at f8 and at its best at f11. At f16 it's lost a bit which isn't too surprising. I might check it against my other 50's sometime. With this one anything between f5.6-11 is fine except when pixel peeping at 100%. IMO.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2018
  13. Raymond Lin

    Raymond Lin

    Messages:
    6,330
    Name:
    Raymond
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I shot silent in an engagement shoot for a bit and they wondered if I was taking any photos, I explained and carried on, then after a while they told me to turn it back on, they prefer the noise of the shutter.

    I can see an advantage if a silent shutter but in instances where people expects that noise, sometimes they end up wanting the noise.

    At least in my limited real world experience.

    So when a couple of politicians posing for photos, if it’s complete silence, they might not know at all (at least without flash) any shots are taken.
     
  14. stevelmx5

    stevelmx5

    Messages:
    9,086
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    No
    When I say that a lens wouldn't be sharp across the frame at 2.8 I mean because of shallow depth of field in real world use. That is, a 50mm lens is more commonly used as a portrait focal length (although yes, any lens can be used for landscape of course!) so would generally be shot at wider apertures. If you shoot a portrait, for example, at F2.8-4, you're going to get sharpness falloff at the edges with even modern lenses due to physics, not necessarily due to the lens quality.
     
  15. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I can see your point but with mirrorless you can have a bleep and maybe set the volume? At the Trump/Kim interview / photo op they were talking and I thought the shutter sound was a bit too loud and distracting. You'll see it on the news if you haven't already.

    I can shoot silently with MFT and no one has ever asked me to turn the sound up. Maybe some are more used to silent or at least quieter cameras than your lot at the enguagement.
     
  16. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Ah sort of see what you mean and in that case older lenses are IMO very often good enough at f2.8-4 in the main subject sort of area as is this one. Looking across the frame to stopped down is still valid as these areas will obviously still be a part of the image and I have to remember what works :D and with the way out of the dof bits you will still be able to form an opinion based on how the detail falls away and aberrations and general lens design weirdness take over :D That's something that's completely different when looking at something like the 55mm f1.8, that is simply excellent.

    I just wanted to do a quick test and although not a brick wall that shot gave me a chance to check performance across much of the frame not just in the central main subject areas. I'll take some picture of Mrs WW from wide open to min aperture and see what looks best and decide if wide open where lenses like this are most unique is a definite no no except in emergencies :D

    These small old lenses and indeed similarly designed modern lenses like the Voigtlander 35mm f1.4 aren't going to give the buttery bokeh a large modern lens like an art or GM will give at the widest apertures and with an unfriendly scene they can give a look that's rather characterful :D but that's part of the appeal and is to an extent tamed as you stop down. I do tend to see these old lenses as dual personality lenses as at their widest apertures you often get the funkiness you might expect and love or hate but stopped down they are very often just nice lenses :D I can't imagine anyone other than an extreme nerd (er, ok that's us :D) complaining about most of the old lenses I have once they're stopped down a bit.
     
    stevelmx5 likes this.
  17. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2018
  18. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    14,396
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Second shooter over the weekend just passed, never done weddings before, really enjoyed it. Sony A7iii and 85FE 1.8 worked together beautifully and used silent shutter along with eye AF and spot, not once did I have AF issues and some of the shots it nailed were incredibly tough, sensor performance top notch and I shot in EXTREME backlight in some cases. Also flicked between APSC crop at times to get some more reach which was nice.

    What a superb camera.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2018
  19. mike_6480

    mike_6480

    Messages:
    2,348
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes have had one for around a week. No issues from my perspective so far. Haven't had a Sony official one before so haven't got any comparison to the official one.

    Have had meike ones before on Canon DSLRs though and never had any issues with them previously either
     
  20. F/1.4

    F/1.4

    Messages:
    1,846
    Name:
    Anthony
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Can the remote be used to trigger the camera without having the grip attached
     
  21. mike_6480

    mike_6480

    Messages:
    2,348
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I haven't actually tried. Have only tried out the remote with the grip attached
     
    F/1.4 likes this.
  22. F/1.4

    F/1.4

    Messages:
    1,846
    Name:
    Anthony
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Can you use it to shoot exposures longer than 30 seconds ?
     
  23. Raymond Lin

    Raymond Lin

    Messages:
    6,330
    Name:
    Raymond
    Edit My Images:
    No
    How many batteries did you go through?
     
  24. mike_6480

    mike_6480

    Messages:
    2,348
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Just tried it and no it doesn't. Only works when the grip is attached
     
    F/1.4 likes this.
  25. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    14,396
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Still had remaining life on the first (Took about 400 shots). I couldn't stay the whole day, I did some location stuff and to exchange of vows where main tog did his thing as I wanted to stay out the way, then did confetti, drinks outside and finally back in for speeches and dinner. Then I made a move home.

    It was a taster for me as Ive always been nervous about weddings for some reason.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2018
    stevelmx5 and jonneymendoza like this.
  26. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
    So your not gunna sell it?
     
  27. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    14,396
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Nope. Never really considered that.
     
  28. mike_6480

    mike_6480

    Messages:
    2,348
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes if you put the camera into bulb mode (ie manual and then make it longer than 30" so says bulb).

    Then you hold down the remote button for approx 3 seconds and can then let go. The remote will then show long long the exposure has been going for. You then press the remote again to stop the exposure
     
    F/1.4 likes this.
  29. T_J_G

    T_J_G

    Messages:
    3,667
    Name:
    Tim
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    :eek::eek:
     
  30. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    14,396
    Edit My Images:
    No
    :eek: I know! You should get one.
     
    T_J_G likes this.
  31. T_J_G

    T_J_G

    Messages:
    3,667
    Name:
    Tim
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I will do at some point
     
  32. chrism_scotland

    chrism_scotland

    Messages:
    8,081
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Just wanted to quote all of this and try and reply to bits of it as I've been using as 12.9" iPad Pro since January as basically my main editing device and went through a lot of pain with some of this!!

    I wouldn’t rely too much on being able to connect other devices directly, for SD cards the Apple SD Card reader works well, you need to import the RAWs into Apple Photo’s and then import into Lightroom Mobile though (I then delete of “photos”), fairly quick to import though but something to consider when looking at which capacity you want to buy.

    I also have the USB adapter however I’ve found that few of my USB peripherals actually work, most seem to require additional power (or a powered USB hub) to work, I tend to use it to plug in an Ethernet cable when uploading to the Adobe CC Cloud.

    The HDMI adapter is pretty dire - I ended up buying an Apple TV for screen mirroring (and a whole lot more!) instead!!

    File Management is a lot better than it used to be, I bought an app called FileBrowser for Business (£10 I think) which is just amazing, lets me share almost anything into various different apps / cloud, etc - it also works very nicely with my Western Digital Wireless Drive - this means I can open and stream movies straight from the Hard-Drive without relying on connecting it via USB/Lightening, etc - its also possible to import RAW files using a wireless drive, but again you need to go through the same process (import into a Photo’s album then into Lightroom).

    I’ll maybe write up a guide to help folk as its been a lot of trial and error for me over the last few months.

    Also along with Lightroom, spend the £20 on Affinity (or keep an eye out for an offer) - more than worth the money, its brilliant being able to do a but more involved editing on the move!!!
     
    footman, Riz_Guru and jonneymendoza like this.
  33. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
  34. chrism_scotland

    chrism_scotland

    Messages:
    8,081
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  35. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Maybe not now, it may be rather empty now :D

    Maybe he makes a lot from his ghost hunting (or whatever they are) things.
     
  36. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
  37. simonbarker

    simonbarker

    Messages:
    1,869
    Edit My Images:
    No
    What are you talking about? He only mentions Nikon 22 times in the review.
     
    woof woof likes this.
  38. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Gave up on the iPad.price Vs amount of use Is what swayed me. Definitely been money pinching this year
     
  39. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Small mercies.
     
  40. decigallen

    decigallen

    Messages:
    989
    Edit My Images:
    No
    He's not as objective as he could be. He clearly loves Nikon and goes into his reviews with that mindset. Reviews shouldn't be about cheap and snide sniping at both the camera, it's manufacturers and other reviewers.

    I've noticed how when it's an area where the Nikon does have the edge he talks about them, but at other times when tearing into the Sonys on things like, focus peaking, evf, card slots, burst shooting and buffer, he often doesn't mention Nikon - the D750, for example, has two UHS-1 slots, fewer fps and an atrocious buffer, no EVF, terrible LV focusing and no focus peaking.
     
    F/1.4 likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice