1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  1. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    14,592
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Play nice :D
     
  2. Mr Perceptive

    Mr Perceptive

    Messages:
    2,705
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Well we will have to disagree then!! No legacy manual lens has come close to sharpness against the native Fuji XF lenses I have, not they aren't capable of producing a decent image.
     
  3. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    3,973
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Haha Yea
     
  4. Nuzik

    Nuzik

    Messages:
    1,063
    Name:
    Neil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Anyone shot a wedding with the A7RII?
     
    Riz_Guru likes this.
  5. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    14,592
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    How legacy lenses compare to modern lenses wasn't what I was replying to. What I was replying to was this...

    And although I'm repeating myself :D I have to say that I think you're wrong. Yes with a crop camera you only see the better central section of the image but what you see has been magnified more and will suffer for it. All IMHO of course but others seem to agree :D If you find otherwise then good luck to you and I'm happy for you but the exact opposite has been my experience and my legacy lenses have a new lease of life on my FF A7 :D

    "Decent" is I suppose open to debate. Whilst I'm certain that my old lenses perform better on FF than on my MFT camera I'll also say that they can't compete with my Sony primes for technical excellence across the frame especially at wide apertures. For example I tested my legacy 50mm lenses against my Sony 55mm and it simply crushes them. The look is a different matter and my 50mm f1.2 Rokkor (for example) give a look that I like, from wide open to stopped down.

    Have you used old lenses on a FF camera?
     
  6. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Will do my first in few weeks. That's if stick with this system
     
    Nuzik and Riz_Guru like this.
  7. Riz_Guru

    Riz_Guru

    Messages:
    2,912
    Name:
    Riz
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Back to Fuji?
    Still got some of my epic Fujinon lenses for sale, bulk deal ;) lol
     
    addicknchips likes this.
  8. Riz_Guru

    Riz_Guru

    Messages:
    2,912
    Name:
    Riz
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Hi,

    Yes shot a couple of weddings with the A7RII's and some charity events.

    Cheers,

    Riz
     
  9. Nuzik

    Nuzik

    Messages:
    1,063
    Name:
    Neil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Surely you wouldn't go back to Fuji? I mean a 5DmkIV or a D750+ I get but not that s***ty xt2!!!
     
    jonneymendoza likes this.
  10. Nuzik

    Nuzik

    Messages:
    1,063
    Name:
    Neil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    How did it go?
     
    Riz_Guru likes this.
  11. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Best alrounder I've ever used
     
    Riz_Guru likes this.
  12. Riz_Guru

    Riz_Guru

    Messages:
    2,912
    Name:
    Riz
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Just about to pop out but when I'm back I'll type up a quick review. :)
     
    Nuzik likes this.
  13. Nuzik

    Nuzik

    Messages:
    1,063
    Name:
    Neil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    All-round what? Rubbish. Hated the bloody thing.
     
  14. chrism_scotland

    chrism_scotland

    Messages:
    7,031
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    That's your opinion. Plenty of people are more than happy with the XT2. Aside from the A9 it has better AF than most of the Sony bodies.
     
    Riz_Guru likes this.
  15. Riz_Guru

    Riz_Guru

    Messages:
    2,912
    Name:
    Riz
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I'm afraid I have to agree, the Fuji XT-2's AF system is better than most of the Sony bodies and one of the reasons I shifted from the A7RII, there are other reasons when I moved to Fuji too but the Fuji also has negatives so you need to understand these and decide what's right for you.
    Both are great systems imo and you can't go wrong with them.
     
    chrism_scotland likes this.
  16. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    532
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'm afraid I'd have to disagree. While XT2 is definitely a huge improvement over XT1 (which was terribad even after their 400 firmware updates :p ) its still not as good as A6300/A6500. Its about as good as A7RII which is not a good thing since it has a APS-C sensor. Also doesn't provide AF with adapted lenses.
     
    Nuzik likes this.
  17. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Quick &a reliable af and focus tracking, ergonomically superb, decent mp sensor and lots of decent glass, two cards slots..

    Was lacking 3rd hss support, but that had now been sorted. Personally I just found it a joy to use.

    What didn't you like about it?
     
    Nuzik likes this.
  18. Nuzik

    Nuzik

    Messages:
    1,063
    Name:
    Neil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    We fell apart like a bad marriage couldn't get on with it at all.
     
  19. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Sorry - in my experience one thing the xt2 smokes the A7rii at is focus tracking.
     
    Riz_Guru likes this.
  20. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    But why? Must have been something for you to hate it.
     
  21. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    10,390
    Edit My Images:
    No
    What about continuous single point af?
     
  22. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    532
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I wouldn't say it smokes anything apart from may be XT1 :p
    Its still rather unreliable, and no more reliable than A7RII. Not mention some lenses are also slow to focus on fuji.

    Anyway when its subjective opinion, we'll just have to agree to disagree :D
    If focus tracking was really of particular concern and I wanted something reliable most of the time, I'd probably go with D750 not Fuji or Sony.
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2017
  23. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It's not bad - but with a subject such as a small child running toward camera my hit rate was considerable higher with the x-t2. Possibly my poor technique and skill level.
     
  24. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    10,390
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Interesting, thanks.
     
  25. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  26. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    3,973
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Frame rate helps a bit. Plus it's a crop sensor so less data to move for af?
     
  27. Nuzik

    Nuzik

    Messages:
    1,063
    Name:
    Neil
    Edit My Images:
    No
    The most interesting thing about this is I don't use focus tracking I never have it's too unreliable. And I seem to get more in focus on the A7R2 than the XT2 of my kids.
     
    addicknchips and jonneymendoza like this.
  28. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    3,973
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Then it must be as good as the a9 for af?
     
  29. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    10,390
    Edit My Images:
    No
    How do you get that from what he said?
     
  30. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    3,973
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Because the a9 smokes the af. And apparently so does the Xt2 yet loads of people who have been used and compared it seem to think it's barely any better than the a7r2

    The a9 is the first true af that goes toe to toe with the very best dslr.

    So I guess the Xt2 can focus as good as a d500?
     
  31. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    The x-t2 is very fast at af. I think the general opinion has been that it holds its own. I don't think it is as good as the d500 though but I haven't used a d500. Have you?

    I've never compared it to the a9 and would not expect it to be up there with the a9. You can buy 3 x-t2's for the price of an a9 so I certainly would expect the a9 to outperform it in every department.

    I've never considered the A7rii to be a speed demon though, so am very surprised to hear that loads of people have compared the two (A7rii and xt2) and found that they perform similarly. Obviously the right glass needs to be used as well.
     
  32. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    3,973
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I'm also surprised that some Say that the a7r2 is slow for af tracking.

    I've said a lot times here that the af is as good as my canon 5d3 using native lenses anything better you are looking at d5/1dx2 territory imo.

    The only thing slow about the camera is its buffer rate. Af speed is very fast and accurate
     
  33. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    10,390
    Edit My Images:
    No
    He never said anything about the A9 in that post.
     
  34. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'd say about 70% of weddings I've been to over the last 4 years the togs have been using a 5d3. Always thought it was an excellent choice for weddings.

    Pretty much all the feedback I've had about the A7rii is that it just doesn't focus fast enough for weddings. So it's encouraging to hear that it matches the 5d3.
     
    Nuzik likes this.
  35. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    3,973
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Some here do weddings on an a7r2 and said it af fine on the job and I've heard it myself on other places too. I've done a reception wedding as a second shooter and it was fine again.
     
  36. addicknchips

    addicknchips

    Messages:
    3,536
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I know @Riz_Guru and @david357 have done. Thoughts chaps?

    The shoot I did last night was a big party in a function room similar to a wedding reception. Very challenging conditions, disco lasers all over the place. Camera did pretty well. Used the 28f2 for most of the night. If that lens had a Fuji badge on it I'm sure it would be regarded as a "must own". It really is a good performer. Had the 55 1.8 on for part of the night which also did well. Tried the 85 for a few longer shots but just constantly hunted.
     
  37. Riz_Guru

    Riz_Guru

    Messages:
    2,912
    Name:
    Riz
    Edit My Images:
    No
  38. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    14,592
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I suppose that'll interest a lot of people but I doubt I'll ever be interested as I like compact kit. I'll probably just stick to my 55mm f1.8 and 35mm f2.8.

    It'll be nice to see more options though :D
     
    Nuzik likes this.
  39. stevelmx5

    stevelmx5

    Messages:
    7,004
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Riz_Guru likes this.
  40. Riz_Guru

    Riz_Guru

    Messages:
    2,912
    Name:
    Riz
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Right where do a start, I believe the problem is that what each one of expects in AF performance/AF-C tracking differs so much that we'll never be able agree which body is the best etc, you have to remember technique also plays a big part too so having the fastest AF tracking body ever made won't help if you are blind as a bat. lol :D

    I have said this before and will say it again, any decent mirrorless body from probably the Sony A7 II, A7RII, Fuji XT-2 can shoot weddings if you work around their short comings and traits, you can find many photographers using these bodies without too much difficulty.

    The weddings I shot with the A7RII's were mainly shot using the FE 24-70mm G Master for 90% of the time and it performed wonderfully, a real work horse of a lens.
    The Fuji XT-2 and the Fuji system in general is great, smaller and cheaper than the Sony offerings but you have to understand its limitations in terms of DR/ISO etc.

    For my requirements I preferred the AF-C tracking of the Fuji XT-2 vs the Sony A7RII but it cannot compete in key area's like DR/ISO, Eye-AF etc, its still a very hard choice though as the Sony system is not cheap, Fuji is a good all-rounder as its already been mentioned. :)
     
    Nuzik, jonneymendoza and stevelmx5 like this.

Share This Page