Or as we say at work: what's the difference between God & a doctor? God knows he's not a doctor.Overwhelming sense of elitist entitlement.
Although it seems certain the lockdown will be officially extended, I just wonder what ideas anyone is going to suggest for an exit stratergy. With no cure, no vaccine and presumably thousands still infected in the community how we get out of this I don't know
Or as we say at work: what's the difference between God & a doctor? God knows he's not a doctor.
Question was asked today about exit strategy, think it was BBC news, virologist pretty sure one of the gov advisers, said it was probably the most important questions ATM and a lot of work going to to find the correct strategy- hopes to have the answer in a week or so.
Hey..Jason..We don't do God in this thread anymore..it's verbotten
Hey..Jason..We don't do God in this thread anymore..it's verbotten
It is not for you to police this thread. Like violating freedom of speech and imposing your views a bit too much?
None of the gods has been any use so far. Except to help the virus. Sorry, that wasn't a god, just some of their followers...
It is not for you to police this thread
Wouldn’t like to be the one making that decision but it will need to happen sometime as we can’t be on lockdown indefinitely.
Hope they come to the right conclusion. We might learn from what other countries do - hopefully. Journalist asked if it could be confirmed if they would relax the lockdown for certain parts of country initially, by age group and/or for those who have recovered from CV. Virologist would not confirm just said lots of people working on it.
He had been working 15 - 16 hours per day.
Not true.....There does need to be an exit strategy but the problem is that the Government havent managed expectations as everyone is expecting something to happen at the end of a 3 week period from the initiation of the lockdown, however that 3 weeks started a week into a one month plan initially. Instead of clearly stating the lockdown will be reevaluated in 3 weeks theyve fudged it letting people believe lockdowns only for the 3
You never did have a sense of humour from what I've read .
How about you start a thread on the subject in Hot Topics but be sure to take your tin hat
Not true.....
It was quite clear it was for 3 weeks, and would be re-evaluated continuously and also at the end of the 3 weeks.
Boris Johnson said that these measures will be in place for three weeks, and that they will be reviewed at the end of this period.
I'd say it is likely to be a few more weeks yet. I dare say there is a lot of number crunching going on when trying to balance the risk which the lockdown is mitigating, against the cost of the job retention scheme and other government support packages. I think that one of the big unknowns is how the government will decide on how and when these packages are withdrawn. I think that is when the real hardship for many will begin, there will be many businesses that will be unable to start up again at the drop of a hat, and many more who will have to phase in the re-staffing of posts. I seriously doubt the JRS will allow for that, and even if it tried it would be a nightmare to manage.Yep, he was clear that the 3 weeks could be extended. And I imagine it will be.
It's about the only thing he's been clear on though.
Not true.....
It was quite clear it was for 3 weeks, and would be re-evaluated continuously and also at the end of the 3 weeks.
Boris Johnson said that these measures will be in place for three weeks, and that they will be reviewed at the end of this period.
I'm not sure how anyone could make that claim on the current information. The basic rules for the progress of the infection (as I understand them) are:Hopefully we are now approaching the peak on infections now, and therefore probably a week or two away from the worst number of deaths,
I disagree. Assuming she was the right person for the job, the new person has to lake over in the middle of a crisis. Her offence (agree she was wrong) was nothing to do with her performance, if it was she should be sacked — which BTW would mean Johnson & most of the cabinet + Cummings should be sacked.So why are so many on both normal and social media continually talking about the 3 weeks as being a deadline rather than a step in the process of re-evaluation?
So why are so many on both normal and social media continually talking about the 3 weeks as being a deadline rather than a step in the process of re-evaluation?
This is very possibly a very nasty turn in events. If it can pass to animals from humans we might not see the end of this for years.View: https://BANNED/ABC7NY/status/1246904056536276993
Probably for the same reason that so many people struggle to understand what they can and can't do, during the lockdown.So why are so many on both normal and social media continually talking about the 3 weeks as being a deadline rather than a step in the process of re-evaluation?
Now I don't think Nicola Sturgeon should have accepted the resignation; the CMO should have been sacked - she was taking the p***.
No, no! How are you going to get good people to do these, or any, sort of jobs? If you were suggesting it for Johnson & his crew of cronies whose inaction made this problem worse, I could agree with you. It’s just scapegoating by the media like their howling for the blood of the fire chief over Grenfell.Yup, should have been dismissed with no pension etc.. Might seem harsh but what she did was stupid, irresponsible, stupid and ignoring her own advice.
GOOD person? "Do as I say while I do the opposite." Certainly should not have been given the option of resigning. At least she can now go back to work in a hospital, doing the job she's trained for since she's no longer in an important area - she might be of use there.
So why are so many on both normal and social media continually talking about the 3 weeks as being a deadline rather than a step in the process of re-evaluation?
Agree. Earlier in this thread I suggested after the apology I thought she could continue in her role.
However, it seems she visited the holiday home twice - so much for the earlier comment that she was only visiting to check it as she would not be able visit it until after the current crisis was over.
Now I don't think Nicola Sturgeon should have accepted the resignation; the CMO should have been sacked - she was taking the p***.
Dave
So why are so many on both normal and social media continually talking about the 3 weeks as being a deadline rather than a step in the process of re-evaluation?