Taken yesterday in some local woods
77D 100m macro f2.8 1/30 ISO100.
Image reduced to 25%, no cropping, no editing
My thoughts are:
I went for the big space look, the point of interest in the 1/3rd
I under exposed by 1/3rd just to add a little darkness, it looked to bright on my LCD
The focus on the toadstool was right, it looks sharp enough to me.
There was a little sunlight coming through the trees that i used as it gave the toadstool the orange glow, if i had moved position i would have cast a shadow on it blocking the sunlight.
The depth of field has done a great job bluring the background but sadly its taken out to much of the foreground apart from a thin line from side to side where everything is in focus and to me doesnt look right.
So where have I gone wrong? I'm quite new to this so any point no matter how small will be helpfull.
77D 100m macro f2.8 1/30 ISO100.
Image reduced to 25%, no cropping, no editing
My thoughts are:
I went for the big space look, the point of interest in the 1/3rd
I under exposed by 1/3rd just to add a little darkness, it looked to bright on my LCD
The focus on the toadstool was right, it looks sharp enough to me.
There was a little sunlight coming through the trees that i used as it gave the toadstool the orange glow, if i had moved position i would have cast a shadow on it blocking the sunlight.
The depth of field has done a great job bluring the background but sadly its taken out to much of the foreground apart from a thin line from side to side where everything is in focus and to me doesnt look right.
So where have I gone wrong? I'm quite new to this so any point no matter how small will be helpfull.