- Messages
- 2,529
- Name
- Mike
- Edit My Images
- Yes
A distant shot but a first for me so am chuffed with this
Yellowhammer (male) by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Yellowhammer (male) by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Oh yes - I hadn't noticed that to be honest!Look at them rear claws on that pipit.
Sounds like the lowepro mini is perfect so maybe that is your answer. I just use an ancient cheapo bag for mine.Hi , I just brought a Panasonic FZ1000 , not used it yet , seems most upgraded to the longer lens Sony here . Anyway I am looking for a small camera bag for it to go in . The Lowepro Mini I have is perfect , but my other bridge camera is in that . Any suggestions please ?
Yes I was chuffed when I saw thatI like the coal tit has a halo, very religious Mike.
Another couple in the rain this time. Both with the RX10 iv at iso1600 and cropped.
Willow Tit.
Willow Tit by Ajophotog, on Flickr
Chaffinch.
Chaffinch by Ajophotog, on Flickr
That’s some good fish knowledge Alby! Cheersspiky 3 spine stickleback, hope it goes down the right way. nice catch Mike.
I’d appreciate some advice/views from anyone who uses a Sony RX10iv.
My main photographic interests are landscapes and to a lesser extent wildlife.
On a recent visit to NW Scotland I chatted to a bloke and was impressed by the photos of a number of birds, particularly black throated divers, taken at a distance with his RX10iv, though I only saw them on his phone.
I have also seen the wildlife shots on here with the same camera which are excellent and read the very positive online reviews.
Although landscape will always be my main interest I’d like to have more reach(longest lens I have is a 55-300mm zoom) so, I’m thinking of changing my present system and moving to a RX10iv.
One review of the RX10iv said those mainly interested in landscape might prefer something different so I’d be grateful for any comments about the RX10iv in general and landscape photography in particular.
If you have moved from a DSLR to the RX10iv how did you find it? Was having everything in one camera/lens rather than a camera body and multiple bodies all positive?
Thanks
Dave