Autopano, Panoweaver, Panorama Factory..? Which one and why.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 9479
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 9479

Guest
Hi All.

Just got back from a shoot in the Peaks and got a great panoramic across Monsal Head. Did the do in Canon Photostich and is ok, but not bril. Went online and downloaded what appears to be the 3 best demos for panos and all appear to work, kinda, but with slightly different results and processing times, methods, file sizes etc..

I would apprechatee some feedback from anyone on these 3 programmes and why you do (or don't) use the one you do.

I have to admit, even wth just running the 'auto stich' parts of these demos I can now see why having a dedicated pano programme is much better than a freebie or bolt-on. 10 times better.. but which one..?
 
:bonk: ..ah.. just seen this months competition. Please don't think this is a lead in for best advice for this :)

I might enter but thats not the reason for the original question.
 
TBH, I would put the series of pics through each of the programmes, get the results printed at whatever size you're likely to want them then look at the results from a normal viewing distance. The software I use is called Panorama Maker and is from ArcSoft. Pretty sure it came bundled with a Canon Scanner a few years ago.
 
Any reason why you're not considering PTGUI Pro?

This is a very highly regarded app. (If you've already narrowed your decision down to those 3 apps, I don't want to confuse the situation though!)
 
ahh.. because I've never heard of it.. until now. Just downloaded the trial so I'll see what this has to offer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top