3 comments from 100????????
Well if anyone is coming to cornwall anytime and fancy going to some locations i`d be happy to meet up, only to happy to help.
They are good photos, but not without problems (minor to be fair). I will reply shortly with my take.
For future reference, rather than get upset at the lack of comments, which can happen for a lot of reasons, simply use this thread to get it back on track:
http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=138929
Gary.
3 comments from 100????????
Thanks to those who did comment, seems poor you dont get more comments here, perhaps we shouldn`t bother sharing anymore?
I did say *minor* I can't remember the last time I looked at a landscape photo posted on the forum that had absolutely ZERO room for improvement
1:
My favourite of the set, no real issues. Some of the rock details are lost in shadow, but it really is no biggy at all.
2: My 2nd fave, but its just a portrait version of the first. The landscape version is better balanced. The left hand side here needs more of the rocks imo.
3: I like it but I feel the bottom right rocky area feels awkward. It also feels like it has a really squint horizon.
4: Nothing wrong with it, just not as inspiring as the others. It's a lot of rocky foreground.
5: Again I'm not sure of the lump of foreground rocks work or not.
I'm no expert, and my comments are minor at the very worst. Easy to overlook things like that with the quality of the photos. I am just a fussy bugger, I think it's important to be extremely critical if you are striving to improve.
Gary.
Hi Phil
Well for what its worth photos like these asre what re-kindled my interest in photography.
Any chance of some data apertures shutter spped, filters etc or are they photoshopped?
Mark
Cheers Gary for the comments and i take on board what you say, thank you mate.
Generally shooting with a sigma 10-20mm, Aperture f16, ISO 100, Shooting in aperture mode with the shutter speed selected by camera, generally anything from 1sec to 15sec exposures, while using exposure compensation and reading the histogram, filters i mostly use the hitech 85mm using a 0.9 full nd and a 0.9 grad hard nd.
Using that setup for me works best and the results out of camera are pretty good, some photos i like to use a gentle tweak of curves, dodge and burn and some photos i run through photomatix using a pseudo hdr method.
Hope that helps you out.
i use the hard grad most of the time because i am shooting seascapes and the strong horizion, only time i would use the soft set would be if there is a tree or mountain etc etc in the shot that was rising past the horizion, for instance if i was taking pictures of some cityscapes then a hard grad would put a hard line across a building where as a soft would be a softer blend. Do you get me?
What filters are you using? i`m using the Hitech set and i bought 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 in the soft and hard and it cost £73. although 9 times out of 10 i`ll be using the 0.9 or 0.6.
Also note, in the shots above, although there is some cliffs above the horizon i still chose to use the hard set because it was pretty bright and i didnt mind darkening the tops of the cliffs off.
Great photos...did you use any filters?
Brilliant images! The sort I would buy if I saw them being sold as prints/posters!
well done and good set. I like all of them. Slightly bigger examples would be nice though.
Wow. Absolutely amazing.
I've never been to Cornwall, but these make me want to go right now ^^;