- Messages
- 1,677
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi All,
I've got a slight bit of a quandary that I'd appreciate some 'outside' thoughts on....
I do fair bit of both wildlife and plane photography and as a result of that, I've recently reaquired a 100-400 having tried to make use of a 70-200 2.8 and a 2x teleconverter and finding that combo just doesn't work for me.
However, I've very recently been given the option of acquiring a 200-400 and now can't decide whether to stick or twist with the gear.
Has anyone got the 200-400 or had use of one, any particular thoughts on it's use? Is it any good? Better/worse than the 100-400?
I don't want to change for sake of changing, however if there are benefits to be had, I don't want to miss the opportunity!
All thoughts appreciated!
Cheers,
Matt
I've got a slight bit of a quandary that I'd appreciate some 'outside' thoughts on....
I do fair bit of both wildlife and plane photography and as a result of that, I've recently reaquired a 100-400 having tried to make use of a 70-200 2.8 and a 2x teleconverter and finding that combo just doesn't work for me.
However, I've very recently been given the option of acquiring a 200-400 and now can't decide whether to stick or twist with the gear.
Has anyone got the 200-400 or had use of one, any particular thoughts on it's use? Is it any good? Better/worse than the 100-400?
I don't want to change for sake of changing, however if there are benefits to be had, I don't want to miss the opportunity!
All thoughts appreciated!
Cheers,
Matt
Last edited: