12 free hasselblads to the first to pick them up!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ditchdigger
  • Start date Start date
D

ditchdigger

Guest
its a 500,000 mile round trip though. they where left behind on the moon to save weight on return. :cool:

see digital SLR photography this month,some great moon photos and equipment lists.

eat your heart out canon, nikon f3,f4,f5 and now d2x have been used by NASA

its a great magazine and i found this article really inspiring :love:

ps if anyone goes can you pick one up for me thanks :lol:
 
I was planning a weekend away there actually for the end of the month... but apparently there isn't much atmosphere :shrug: :coat:
 
But, what if they are "virtual" Hassleblads.....As some claim the moon landings were an invention.
 
The reason they use Nikon up there is becsuse they don't want to leave a good lens behind ;)
 
I wonder if any aliens told them they weren't allowed to take pictures there with 'big cameras' :shrug:
 
who left a D2X on the moon - no one been there for years lol

ditchdigger said:
its a 500,000 mile round trip though. they where left behind on the moon to save weight on return. :cool:

see digital SLR photography this month,some great moon photos and equipment lists.

eat your heart out canon, nikon f3,f4,f5 and now d2x have been used by NASA

its a great magazine and i found this article really inspiring :love:

ps if anyone goes can you pick one up for me thanks :lol:
Click to expand...
 
Old news,but if you spot the Gold plated anniversary one up there :naughty: Then I got first shout on it :D
 
as far as i know its just the hasselblads on the moon
unless there has been some secret landings.
its all news to me
 
"I hollered "DON'T LOOK, ETHEL" But it's too late, she'd already been MOONED"

Ray Stevens - The Streak

oops, wrong sort of moon.
 
Chaz Photos said:
If the moon landing was true can anyone photograph the landing site so we can see the flag left along with all the other junk.
Click to expand...
In a word, no.

You're suggesting that somebody should photograph an object that's about 4m across (the lunar lander) from a distance of 400,000km. That's equivalent to photographing a postage stamp in Rome from a vantage point in Edinburgh.
 
Chaz Photos said:
If the moon landing was true can anyone photograph the landing site so we can see the flag left along with all the other junk.
Click to expand...

Even hubble can't do it sadly. Best indicator of authenticity, if anyone needs one, is the Russians and there constant tracking of the event as it happened.
 
StewartR said:
In a word, no.

You're suggesting that somebody should photograph an object that's about 4m across (the lunar lander) from a distance of 400,000km. That's equivalent to photographing a postage stamp in Rome from a vantage point in Edinburgh.
Click to expand...

Yeah..... I think we could do it... all we need are some memory chips with the plastic cut off a couple of tele converters and one of these top quality hand made lenses.....lens:):)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top