- Messages
- 25,363
- Name
- Phil
- Edit My Images
- No
Neither of those are me? :bang:You may well be a lecturer or a technical writer in your other life, you haven't said which you are but here you're just another member who when you haven't been insulting or patronising (and you do continue to do both in post after post) has stated your opinion. You say it's fact, I disagree.
Play the ball - not the man; You might see me as an easy target - but it doesn't alter the fact that some things in photography are based on maths and physics. At which point, my opinion, your opinion or anyone else's opinion ceases to be relevant. There are real rules that govern maths and physics.
And at the point when opinion ceases to be relevant, people who get paid for their professional knowledge become the people you'd want to listen to.
Arguing with me might be fun, personally insulting me might be your bag too - I really don't care. But refuting the laws of physics is a bit daft:bonk:
I love the way that the people who are wrong in this thread are clinging to the word 'opinion' as if it makes a difference - You're entitled to believe what you want, but science requires a measurement of evidence, and the measurement of evidence is what people who are right are calling facts, they're different to opinions.
And still, at the end of the day, it's only a rule of thumb, and some people have really steady hands and some people need a tripod to get a sharp picture at any speed.